<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Flaws in democratic system exposed by triumphalism

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-02-04 08:41

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, this is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development, but it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          The widespread sentiment within Western electorates that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the United States and United Kingdom and may play a role in future outcomes in 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in the UK and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system-people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit, on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" but only after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures demonstrate the values and benefits of different choices.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 波多结野衣一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品日韩香蕉网| 91精品免费久久久| 午夜福利片1000无码免费| 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天 | 特黄三级一区二区三区| 亚洲最大天堂在线看视频| av无码小缝喷白浆在线观看| 亚洲男人电影天堂无码| 国产偷国产偷亚洲清高| 国产第一区二区三区精品| 亚洲色大成网站WWW永久麻豆| 欧美一区二区自偷自拍视频| 日韩精品亚洲专在线电影| 欧美色欧美亚洲国产熟妇| 国产自拍一区二区三区在线| 最近中文字幕完整版2019| 国产精品一区二区久久精品| 免费夜色污私人影院在线观看| 国产a网站| 国产福利高颜值在线观看| 国产99视频精品免费专区| 亚洲国产成人综合精品| 91色老久久精品偷偷蜜臀| 深夜福利资源在线观看| 欧美~日韩~国产~中文字幕| 久久九九99这里有视频| 丁香婷婷综合激情五月色| 国产极品粉嫩学生一线天| 精品熟女少妇免费久久| 国产精品一二三区久久狼| 视频二区国产精品职场同事| 在线观看热码亚洲av每日更新| 中文字幕无码人妻aaa片| 撕开奶罩疯狂揉吮奶头| 亚洲欧美日韩综合一区在线 | 性色在线视频精品| 亚洲丶国产丶欧美一区二区三区 | 亚洲成人av在线系列| 在线精品一区二区三区视频| 精品国产精品中文字幕|