<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          China
          Home / China / View

          Democracy or humility? Why not both?

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily Europe | Updated: 2017-01-28 08:25

          Recent shock polling results have opened the world's eyes to the fact that no form of government is totally flawless

          Democracy, as Britain's wartime prime minister Winston Churchill is often quoted as saying, is the worst form of government except for all the others.

          Even if he did not say precisely that, it is how his pithy aphorism is best remembered. It is a handy phrase for democrats to fall back on when democracy appears to be under pressure.

          China's People's Daily reflected recently that Western-style democracy used to be recognized as a historical driver of social development. But now, it has reached its limits. In an analysis that will find an echo among many disgruntled voters in the West, it suggested democracy had been hijacked as a weapon for capitalists to boost their profits.

          A widespread sentiment within Western electorates, that they have been ignored and left behind by self-perpetuating elites, is seen as a key factor in recent election and referendum results in the US and Britain and may play a role in future outcomes of 2017.

          On the face of it, the Brexit referendum vote in Britain and Donald Trump's victory in the US should be regarded as a vindication of the democratic system - the people were given a choice and they have made their decision.

          Both results, however, have spurred soul-searching about what these outcomes mean for the future of a political system that is intended to safeguard the interests of all its citizens, not just those who picked the winner.

          A worrying trend that has emerged is a "winner-takes-all" attitude among the victors.

          Among some who voted for Brexit on the ostensible grounds that it would allow the UK to regain its democratic rights from an undemocratic European Union, a discomfiting tendency has emerged to delegitimize the views of those who continue to warn about the negative consequences of that decision.

          For example, the UK's pro-Brexit Daily Mail newspaper described a legal challenge to launching Brexit without the assent of Parliament as an unpatriotic attempt to subvert the will of the people. It is an attitude of "We won, you lost, shut up".

          Similarly, in the US, there are fears that the new administration has little tolerance for the kind of dissent displayed by demonstrators on the streets of Washington the day after President Donald Trump's inauguration.

          Those fears may be misplaced and, to be fair to Trump, he conceded that "peaceful protests are a hallmark of our democracy" after earlier castigating the demonstrators for overlooking the results of the election.

          A prevailing view among liberal analysts, however, and more than a few conservative commentators, is that Trump's brand of populism poses a threat to American democratic values.

          A Washington Post article by veteran conservative commentator George Will referred to Trump's "feral cunning in manipulating the masses and the media" and implicitly criticized the hostile tone the new president has adopted toward China and others.

          Others have decried the authoritarian tendencies Trump displayed during his campaign and his alleged anti-democratic behavior since the election. "Donald J. Trump's election has raised a question that few Americans ever imagined asking: Is our democracy in danger?" academics Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt told readers of the New York Times back in December.

          Little over a quarter-century ago, the American political scientist Francis Fukuyama was arguing that the spread of liberal democracy and free market capitalism might be the endpoint of humanity's social evolution.

          It has been something of a rocky road since then. But it is perhaps a little premature to write off democracy as a system that has brought no positive benefits to those societies where it has evolved.

          Recent events should, however, generate some humility within the democratic camp and a recognition that other societies with other histories and cultures have taken a different road.

          Within the international context, what is important is to reinforce the partnerships that have evolved since World War II among societies at various stages of social, political and economic development to tackle the daunting challenges that we all face.

          The author is a senior media consultant to China Daily. To contact the writer at harvey.morris@gmail.com

          Editor's picks
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国内在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲av综合色区无码专区| 最近最好的2019中文| 成人福利一区二区视频在线 | 日韩中文字幕v亚洲中文字幕| 国内精品久久久久影院网站| 亚洲一区二区三区在线播放无码 | 亚洲VA久久久噜噜噜久久无码| 国产精品一区自拍视频 | 亚洲精品天堂成人片AV在线播放| 日韩精品一区二区亚洲av| 日韩高清亚洲日韩精品一区二区| 性欧美vr高清极品| 在线日韩日本国产亚洲| 国产97人人超碰CAO蜜芽PROM| 欧日韩无套内射变态| 久久精品人人做人人爽97| 少妇高潮太爽了在线观看| 国色天香中文字幕在线视频| 一区二区三区在线 | 欧洲| 亚洲成av人片在www鸭子| A毛片毛片看免费| 国产免费一区二区三区在线观看| 美女内射中出草草视频| 一区二区三区精品自拍视频| 午夜不卡欧美AAAAAA在线观看| 91久久国产成人免费观看| 国产精品一在线观看| 人妻系列中文字幕精品| 亚洲一区二区三区在线观看精品中文 | 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码606| 日本一区二区三区在线 |观看| 人人爽人人模人人人爽人人爱| 裸体女人亚洲精品一区| 国产69精品久久久久乱码免费| 国产精品一区免费在线看| 亚洲性线免费观看视频成熟| 亚洲男人天堂2021| 日韩一区二区一卡二卡av| 91精品91久久久久久| 精品一日韩美女性夜视频|