<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Time to break free of protectionist shackles

          By Mei Xinyu (China Daily) Updated: 2016-05-25 07:45

          Time to break free of protectionist shackles

          An employee welds the exterior of a vehicle along a production line at a factory in Qingdao, Shandong province. [Photo/Agencies]

          The overwhelming-majority vote in the European Parliament recently against granting China market economy status was not made on a reasonable basis and doing so will not bring benefits to the European Union.

          Whether or not to give China the market economy status treatment is not an issue concerning whether China has met market economic standards unilaterally set by the EU, but an issue concerning whether the EU honors its commitment or not.

          According to the accession articles China signed on entry to the World Trade Organization 15 years ago, China should be automatically granted market economy status in December this year. Such an article is unconditional and means that WTO members should abandon the surrogate country approach used in the past for anti-dumping investigations against China. Any investigation should instead be based on product prices or production costs in China itself.

          Aside from the long-term negative effects produced by the protectionist effort to avoid industrial competition, the European Parliament's refusal to grant China market economy treatment will not have favorable short-term effects on the bloc's industrial development. In a passed resolution, the European Parliament pointed out that 56 of the anti-dumping measures the EU is taking are targeted at imports from China, covering both traditional labor-intensive manufacturing and such capital and technology-intensive manufacturing as steel products. It is exactly such an announcement that has made protectionists in the EU lobby for not granting China market economy status so that they can say "no" to "made in China" brands as a means of job protection.

          Some in the EU should know that while exporting products to the rest of the world, China is also the world's leading market for imports and its growth in imports is among the fastest of world's major economies either in trade in goods or in trade in services. China's import volume denominated in the US dollar suffered a 14.1 percent decline year-on-year in 2015, bigger than the 13.4 percent decline in the import volume of the EU, but this was mainly a result of the drastic drop in prices of the primary commodities China heavily imports. China's imports of manufactured goods from the United States and European countries still enjoy huge potential for growth.

          Following the European Parliament's recommendation will do no good to the struggling EU economy, given that encouraging trade protectionism will do nothing but worsen the EU's industrial environment. There were some countries in the past that did succeed in realizing the development of some infant industries through protectionist industrial policies. However, what the European Parliament's resolution tried to protect is not high-tech pioneering sectors, but such traditional sectors as steel that have already experienced their golden period and now enjoy no development potential. Interest groups dominating these out-of-date and weakly-founded industries do not focus their attention on how to raise their efficiency, but instead think how to maintain previous protectionist measures to lengthen their survival. Such attempts offer no hope for the future of EU industry and on the contrary add to its cost burden. What the EU should do is to inject new vitality into its economy.

          The protectionism of interest groups has shackled the EU's economic vitality. It is exactly trade protectionism that has put the eurozone economy at a disadvantageous position in its competition with other developed economies, and caused the continuous decline of its economic proportion in the world's total GDP. Of the EU members, the countries advocating liberal trade such as the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Belgium, support granting China market economy status and they have also achieved a better economic performance than the eurozone as a whole. France, Italy and Spain who are opposed to granting China market economy status, however, have performed worse than the eurozone's average performance

          Europe should know that the development and buildup of interest groups, a byproduct of a country or region's economic prosperity, will suffocate the vigor of its innovation and continuous growth, and only by smashing the shackles imposed by these groups can it achieve sustainable development.

          The author is a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce's International Trade and Economic Cooperation Institute.

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一区二区三区精品综合| 国产精成人品日日拍夜夜免费| 亚洲乱色熟女一区二区蜜臀| 欧美成人h精品网站| 永久免费AV无码国产网站| 亚洲精品揄拍自拍首页一| 不卡视频在线一区二区三区| 国产一区二区三区韩国| 亚洲日本欧美日韩中文字幕| 少妇人妻偷人一区二区| 欧美性巨大╳╳╳╳╳高跟鞋| 精品国产中文字幕av| 乌克兰丰满女人a级毛片右手影院| 亚洲av产在线精品亚洲第一站| 亚洲AV无码乱码1区久久| 日韩精品中文字幕有码| 在线免费播放av观看| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 国产精品一区在线免费看| 青草成人在线视频观看| 亚洲一区二区三区| 国产99在线 | 免费| 国产精品igao视频| 日韩加勒比一本无码精品| 亚洲AV午夜成人无码电影| 成人无码一区二区三区网站| 亚洲精品久久婷婷丁香51| 综合色一色综合久久网| 国产综合色一区二区三区| 午夜福利在线观看成人| 老司机精品视频在线| 亚洲旡码欧美大片| 在线观看精品自拍视频| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交aⅴ图片| 亚洲国产综合自在线另类| 国产精品国产自产拍高清| 久久99精品国产麻豆婷婷| 激情国产一区二区三区四区| 国产在线中文字幕精品| 国产一区二区色婬影院| 欧美日韩亚洲国产|