<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / From the Readers

          Not the right move to curb pollution

          (China Daily) Updated: 2014-04-22 08:39

          Comment on "Pollution discharge fees to rise dramatically" (China Daily, April 16)

          I don't agree with the method of collecting pollution discharge fee to deal with the environmental problem. Why should the money collected be called "fee" rather than "fine"? Is the fee a penalty that factories polluting and endangering our environment have to pay? Or, is it an amount polluters need to pay to continue polluting our air, water and soil as they wish, without any punishment?

          It's also ridiculous to hear that it's a "commercial way" of checking pollution - the simplistic assumption being that enterprises may stop polluting when they can't afford to pay the discharge fee. If so, why have the environmental authorities set a maximum ceiling for the discharge fee?

          Does it mean that if the enterprises are rich enough to pay the maximum fee, they can pollute our air, water and soil as much as possible and nobody can stop them? It seems more like a measure to allow local environmental authorities to collect money than a move to curb pollution.

          I also don't like the idea of managing the environment after allowing enterprises (and other entities) to pollute it. It's understandable that local authorities are under great pressure to maintain or increase local economies' GDP growth and create more jobs, which they cannot do if they immediately shut down the polluting plants and factories.

          But we shouldn't focus on short-term interests at the cost of long-term social well-being. How much will it cost in the future to clean the environment that we pollute today? I'm sure it will cost much, much more than the money that environmental protection authorities collect today.

          That is why I suggest the authorities change their mind and method to reduce pollution as soon as possible.

          MARIE, via e-mail

          Readers' comments are welcome. Please send your e-mail to opinion@chinadaily.com.cn or letters@chinadaily.com.cn or to the individual columnists. China Daily reserves the right to edit all letters. Thank you.

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品精品自在现拍国产2021| 国产精品久久久久久无毒不卡 | 欧美做受视频播放| 国产亚洲精品成人aa片新蒲金| 老司机午夜精品视频资源| 中文字幕国产精品一二区| 男女激情一区二区三区| 成人国产在线看不卡| 涩涩爱狼人亚洲一区在线| 久久精品av国产一区二区| 国产毛片精品av一区二区| 在线看片免费不卡人成视频| 18av千部影片| 国产成人无码免费视频麻豆| 国精品午夜福利视频| 野外做受三级视频| 麻豆精品久久久久久久99蜜桃| www久久只有这里有精品| 欧美zozo另类人禽交| 国产激情一区二区三区在线 | 国产成人最新三级在线视频| 亚洲综合激情五月色一区| 国产在线精品一区二区中文| 国产精品人成在线播放蜜臀| 国产成人a在线观看视频| 四虎女优在线视频免费看| 亚洲成在人线AⅤ中文字幕| 亚洲线精品一区二区三八戒| 亚洲成a人片在线视频| 成人欧美一区二区三区在线观看| 亚洲AV无码久久精品成人| 无码人妻一区二区三区AV| 成人自拍短视频午夜福利| 色综合天天综合| 亚洲 自拍 另类 欧美 综合| 我被公睡做舒服爽中文字幕| 欧美福利电影A在线播放| 玩弄漂亮少妇高潮白浆| 二区中文字幕在线观看| 久久久久久久久无码精品亚洲日韩| 国产一区二区三区导航|