<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Will Durban end the fight against climate change?

          Updated: 2011-11-26 08:00

          By OP Rana (China Daily)

            Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

          Will Durban end the fight against climate change?

          Greenpeace International released a report on Nov 22, saying a handful of multinational corporations are "exerting undue influence" on the political process in the United States and Canada and other pivotal countries to delay global action on climate change.

          The report, "Who's holding us back? How carbon intensive industry is preventing effective climate legislation", says that major corporations and industry associations representing oil and gas companies and other high-polluting sectors in the US, Canada and Europe are leading the lobbying and marketing efforts. Corporations and industry associations even in South Africa, which will host the UN climate change conference from Nov 28 to Dec 9, are part of the lobbying efforts.

          In the US alone, industry stakeholders spend about $3.5 billion a year to lobby the government and finance American politicians "who deny" scientific evidence linking human activities to global warming, the Greenpeace report says.

          But the Greenpeace report was drowned in the wave generated by "Climategate 2.0", that is, a fresh batch of hacked e-mails on climate change written by scientists of the University of East Anglia in Britain. The leak made climate change skeptics jump to the conclusion that climate scientists were involved in a conspiracy to give a misleading assessment of global warming and reverse the wheels of their countries' economies.

          Since University of East Anglia scientists are on the board of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), climate change contrarians have renewed their attack on the IPCC. Agreed, a couple of IPCC's assessments, such as the rate of melting of Himalayan glaciers, were wrong. But an independent review by leading scientists proved that thousands of its other findings were correct. So is the leak of climate scientists' e-mails aimed at disrupting the Durban climate change conference, just as the first leak did in Copenhagen two years ago?

          The answer is obvious, especially when we consider the Greenpeace report. In fact, Canada has indicated that it plans to walk away from the Kyoto Protocol, which set targets for developed nations to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 2012 as the first step in the fight against global warming. Japan and Russia, too, have indicated they would do likewise.

          Canadian Environment Minister Peter Kent told the House of Commons on Tuesday: "Canada goes to Durban with a number of countries sharing the same objectives and that is to put Kyoto behind us and to encourage all nations and all major emitting countries to embrace a new agreement to reduce GHG in a material way."

          Appeals to get policies that cap and tax carbon emissions cancelled have been submitted to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the European Union and other government bodies.

          In the US, James Inhofe, chairman of Senate committee on environment and public works, said IPCC findings should not be trusted and "Climategate 2.0 e-mails are just one more reason to halt the (Barack) Obama-EPA's job-killing global warming agenda".

          Lending Inhofe support was Myron Ebell, director of Washington-based think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute. Ebell said: " the UN (IPCC) is an organized conspiracy dedicated to tricking the world into believing that global warming is a crisis that requires a drastic response."

          Lost in the din created by climate change skeptics and their lobbyists is what the University of East Anglia said about the leaked e-mails. The university said: "While we have had only a limited opportunity to look at this latest post of 5,000 e-mails, we have no evidence of a recent breach of our systems. As in 2009, extracts from e-mails have been taken completely out of context Following the previous release of e-mails scientists highlighted by the controversy have been vindicated by independent review, and claims that their science cannot or should not be trusted are entirely unsupported."

          That Durban would go the Copenhagen way was already feared. Now the fear is that the developed countries will "veto" any attempt to extend or expand the Kyoto Protocol, which expires next year and which is biding upon developed countries to reduce their GHG emissions. The world will be left without a multilateral agreement to fight climate change, for indications are that the developed countries will press for agreements that will make it compulsory for developing countries like China, India, Brazil, Indonesia and South Africa to cut their emissions.

          And since developing nations will insist on the measures set by the Kyoto Protocol, there will be no deal. No deal means business as usual for the multinationals. And that is exactly what the game plan of the lobbyists is. The challenge for developing nations in Durban is to prevent the lobbyists from succeeding.

          The author is a senior writer with China Daily. E-mail: oprana@hotmail.com.

          (China Daily 11/26/2011 page5)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 三级网站| 999福利激情视频| 2020精品自拍视频曝光| 国产精品美女久久久久久麻豆 | 国产精品麻豆成人av| 自拍偷拍视频一区二区三区 | 好吊妞| 69天堂人成无码免费视频| 日本高清一区二区在线观看| 北岛玲亚洲一区二区三区| 韩国午夜理伦三级| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品青草漫画| 五级黄高潮片90分钟视频| 2021国产成人精品久久| 久久精品免视看国产成人| 日本丰滿岳乱DVD| 国产亚洲精品黑人粗大精选| 亚洲中文字幕无码一久久区| 国产女人在线视频| 国产极品AV嫩模| 中文字幕AV伊人AV无码AV| 国产一区二区三区四区激情| 欧美人成精品网站播放| 国精产品自偷自偷ym使用方法| 国内极度色诱视频网站| av在线手机播放| 4399理论片午午伦夜理片| 国产亚洲精品久久久999蜜臀| 日韩一区二区三区一级片| 久久精品成人免费看| 国产成人高清精品免费软件| 亚洲欧洲日产国码AV天堂偷窥| 青草青草伊人精品视频| 国产无人区码一区二区| 国产精品三级av一区二区| 久久热这里只有精品66| 国产精品久久久一区二区三区| 亚洲成av人最新无码不卡短片| 喷潮出白浆视频在线观看| 欧美国产日本高清不卡| 欧美成本人视频免费播放|