<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Make me your Homepage
          left corner left corner
          China Daily Website

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Updated: 2013-11-30 09:36
          By Cao Yin ( China Daily)

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, is interrupted by a Beijing Times reporter as the two argue about water standards during a news conference in Beijing on Monday. [Zou Hong / China Daily]


          A high-profile case in which a bottled-water producer accused a Beijing newspaper of defamation was heard at Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court on Friday.

          Nongfu Spring, one of China's bottled-water giants, argued with the Beijing Times for more than half a year, claiming the newspaper intentionally and systematically ran 76 "fake" stories from April 10 to May 7 in order to tarnish its image.

          On April 28, the company, based in Hangzhou, capital of Zhejiang province, filed suit against the paper in the capital's No 2 Intermediate People's Court, saying the media had imposed "propagandistic violence" against it and asking for 60 million yuan ($9.7 million) as compensation.

          Later, in Chaoyang District People's Court, the newspaper countercharged the company with damaging its reputation while claiming that the enterprise was following standards laxer than those for tap water when manufacturing its bottled-water products.

          The producer then increased its compensation demand to 200 million yuan.

          On May 6, Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, said the company had adopted both national standards and provincial requirements in Zhejiang, and that the national standards are mandatory for every bottled-water company, which is why they were not printed on its labels.

          Zhong added that in case there is a discrepancy between the two standards, his company follows the stricter one.

          The giant also announced it was closing its branch in the capital, and its dispute with the newspaper became white-hot in a news conference on the same day.

          Chaoyang court finally merged the two cases to try to resolve the conflict.

          At Friday's hearing, the newspaper's representatives provided more than 20 bottles of water, saying all of them followed the national standard except Nongfu, which followed the provincial standard.

          The newspaper's lawyers, Zhang Bin and Xie Guanbin, said during the hearing that before publishing the stories, the paper contacted more than 10 water specialists to ensure that the reports were accurate.

          Apart from Beijing Times, other media, including People's Daily, China Central Television and Xinhua News Agency, had published or broadcast similar stories about Nongfu, the lawyers said.

          "What we question is why the company followed the local water standard, not its product's quality. In other words, what we doubted is the disordered water standard in our country," Zhang said. "The company confused the public and defamed the paper with ugly words.

          "Our client did not fabricate the facts that Nongfu products were off the shelves in supermarkets, because that was provided by a Beijing-based bottled-water association," she said, adding that the media sent an interview outline to the giant.

          The newspaper asked the company to pay 1 yuan as a symbolic compensation, as it was simply aiming to improve the truth of its reports, the lawyers added.

          But Ye Zhijian and Zhang Zhaohua, attorneys for the enterprise, said the stories were not rigorous or scientific, and that the newspaper interpreted out of context the facts in a bid to deliberately smear Nongfu.

          "Take one report's headline, for example. It said Nongfu Spring was not as good as tap water, which obviously damages our client's reputation," Ye said.

          In addition, the company decided to sue the water association because it did not give comments based on the facts and provided information to the media without confirmation, Zhang added.

          The court asked the two parties to continue organizing evidence and did not hand down a verdict after the almost three-hour hearing.

          Earlier in November, the company filed complaints with the top media regulator, made amid a nationwide campaign by the government and news organizations to crack down on false reports and journalistic corruption.

          The move was launched after police in Hunan province detained Chen Yongzhou, a journalist with the Guangdong-based New Express who was suspected of taking bribes and denigrating a Hunan enterprise with fabricated information.

           
           
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品一二三伦理中文| 91久久精品国产性色也| 亚洲欧美成人一区二区三区| 99热国产成人最新精品| 最新国产精品亚洲| 国产成人免费手机在线观看视频| 我要看亚洲黄色太黄一级黄 | 日韩国产精品区一区二区| 久久aaaa片一区二区| 欧美亚洲精品中文字幕乱码 | 人人做人人妻人人精| 欧美黑人XXXX性高清版| 日本在线视频www色影响网站| 国产精品福利自产拍久久 | 老妇女性较大毛片| 国产精品国语对白一区二区| 四虎成人在线观看免费| 国产成人综合亚洲欧美日韩 | 免费人成视频网站在线18| 人成午夜免费大片| 国产亚洲精品A在线无码| 国产亚洲亚洲国产一二区| 一区二区三区国产在线网站视频| 成人国产亚洲精品天堂av| 国产一级片内射在线视频| 99视频在线精品国自产拍| 丝袜a∨在线一区二区三区不卡 | 亚洲日本高清一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久久影视| 亚洲伊人久久精品影院| 精品人妻中文字幕在线| 国产成人免费高清激情视频| 亚洲精品一区二区制服| 97人人模人人爽人人喊电影| 国产精品先锋资源在线看| 国产精品永久免费视频| 国产成人精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲一区二区经典在线播放| 真实单亲乱l仑对白视频| 国内自拍网红在线综合一区| 亚洲AV无码久久精品日韩|