<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Make me your Homepage
          left corner left corner
          China Daily Website

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Updated: 2013-11-30 09:36
          By Cao Yin ( China Daily)

          Court hears Nongfu Spring defamation suit

          Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, is interrupted by a Beijing Times reporter as the two argue about water standards during a news conference in Beijing on Monday. [Zou Hong / China Daily]


          A high-profile case in which a bottled-water producer accused a Beijing newspaper of defamation was heard at Beijing Chaoyang District People's Court on Friday.

          Nongfu Spring, one of China's bottled-water giants, argued with the Beijing Times for more than half a year, claiming the newspaper intentionally and systematically ran 76 "fake" stories from April 10 to May 7 in order to tarnish its image.

          On April 28, the company, based in Hangzhou, capital of Zhejiang province, filed suit against the paper in the capital's No 2 Intermediate People's Court, saying the media had imposed "propagandistic violence" against it and asking for 60 million yuan ($9.7 million) as compensation.

          Later, in Chaoyang District People's Court, the newspaper countercharged the company with damaging its reputation while claiming that the enterprise was following standards laxer than those for tap water when manufacturing its bottled-water products.

          The producer then increased its compensation demand to 200 million yuan.

          On May 6, Zhong Shanshan, chairman of Nongfu Spring, said the company had adopted both national standards and provincial requirements in Zhejiang, and that the national standards are mandatory for every bottled-water company, which is why they were not printed on its labels.

          Zhong added that in case there is a discrepancy between the two standards, his company follows the stricter one.

          The giant also announced it was closing its branch in the capital, and its dispute with the newspaper became white-hot in a news conference on the same day.

          Chaoyang court finally merged the two cases to try to resolve the conflict.

          At Friday's hearing, the newspaper's representatives provided more than 20 bottles of water, saying all of them followed the national standard except Nongfu, which followed the provincial standard.

          The newspaper's lawyers, Zhang Bin and Xie Guanbin, said during the hearing that before publishing the stories, the paper contacted more than 10 water specialists to ensure that the reports were accurate.

          Apart from Beijing Times, other media, including People's Daily, China Central Television and Xinhua News Agency, had published or broadcast similar stories about Nongfu, the lawyers said.

          "What we question is why the company followed the local water standard, not its product's quality. In other words, what we doubted is the disordered water standard in our country," Zhang said. "The company confused the public and defamed the paper with ugly words.

          "Our client did not fabricate the facts that Nongfu products were off the shelves in supermarkets, because that was provided by a Beijing-based bottled-water association," she said, adding that the media sent an interview outline to the giant.

          The newspaper asked the company to pay 1 yuan as a symbolic compensation, as it was simply aiming to improve the truth of its reports, the lawyers added.

          But Ye Zhijian and Zhang Zhaohua, attorneys for the enterprise, said the stories were not rigorous or scientific, and that the newspaper interpreted out of context the facts in a bid to deliberately smear Nongfu.

          "Take one report's headline, for example. It said Nongfu Spring was not as good as tap water, which obviously damages our client's reputation," Ye said.

          In addition, the company decided to sue the water association because it did not give comments based on the facts and provided information to the media without confirmation, Zhang added.

          The court asked the two parties to continue organizing evidence and did not hand down a verdict after the almost three-hour hearing.

          Earlier in November, the company filed complaints with the top media regulator, made amid a nationwide campaign by the government and news organizations to crack down on false reports and journalistic corruption.

          The move was launched after police in Hunan province detained Chen Yongzhou, a journalist with the Guangdong-based New Express who was suspected of taking bribes and denigrating a Hunan enterprise with fabricated information.

           
           
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人精品无码专区| 狠狠久久五月综合色和啪| 亚洲国产精品热久久一区| 国产精品一二三区蜜臀av| 亚洲一区二区三区丝袜| 国产一区二区三区导航| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉av| 黄瓜一区二区三区自拍视频| 国产精品一区二区三区日韩| 日韩伦人妻无码| 日本少妇自慰免费完整版| 久久亚洲国产最新网站| 国产不卡精品视频男人的天堂| 欧洲免费一区二区三区视频| 国产精品午夜福利不卡120| 国产精品中文字幕二区| 少妇顶级牲交免费在线| 四川丰满少妇无套内谢| 国产亚洲精品自在久久vr| 国产av仑乱内谢| 国产初高中生视频在线观看| av永久免费网站在线观看| 老熟妇仑乱换频一区二区| 国产在线线精品宅男网址| 视频一区二区三区中文字幕狠狠| 老子午夜精品无码| 免费av大片在线观看入口| 99久久er热在这里只有精品99| 青青草一区二区免费精品| 欧美老熟妇乱子伦牲交视频| 国产高清视频在线播放www色| 中国女人内谢69xxxx| 欧美福利电影A在线播放| 四虎永久在线精品免费视频观看| 日本精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲AV无码国产永久播放蜜芽| 国产免费久久精品44| 亚洲中文在线精品国产| 97精品尹人久久大香线蕉| 人妻蜜臀久久av不卡| 黄色三级视频中文字幕|