Sowing seeds of agriculture education in young minds for rural vitalization

Cultivating a new generation of professionals who understand agriculture and are committed to serving it is a fundamental task of agricultural higher education in the new era. As the core source of professional support for rural vitalization and the building of an agricultural powerhouse, the cultivation of such talents has moved from isolated exploration to systematic advancement, with its quality directly affecting the effectiveness of strategies to strengthen and vitalize agriculture in the country.

Agricultural universities in China have made notable progress in recent years. Greater emphasis has been placed on reforming practical teaching, promoting the integration of education with scientific research and industry, and deepening cooperation with local enterprises. Diverse education models have been actively explored, extending learning from traditional classrooms to rural communities and the front lines of production.

As a result, students' practical capabilities have been strengthened, their commitment to agriculture has been further nurtured, and the alignment between talent training and the needs of the agricultural sector has steadily improved.

Despite the rapid development, the overall quality of talent cultivation still falls short of the real-world demands of strengthening agriculture. Deeper challenges have begun to emerge, including conceptual misunderstandings, institutional barriers and imbalances in resource allocation.

One major challenge is the lack of mechanisms for fostering a long-term commitment to agriculture. Emotional attachment to farming and rural areas is often built through short-term practical activities, without sustained and immersive rural experiences. This makes the educational process difficult to evaluate and results in weak professional identity among some students, who may have only a partial understanding of agriculture or a superficial emotional connection to it.

Another problem is the insufficient integration between education and industry. Practical teaching is often short-term and fragmented, failing to form a mutually reinforcing relationship with agricultural development. Traditional evaluation systems continue to focus heavily on classroom and laboratory performance, leaving students less prepared to solve real-world problems. Their professional expertise and practical competence in serving agriculture need strengthening.

In addition, collaborative education mechanisms remain underdeveloped. There is inadequate coordination among universities, governments, industries and rural communities, and there is no efficient linkage mechanism. The aggregation and utilization of resources are also limited, making it difficult to form a strong educational synergy.

Imbalances in resource allocation further constrain progress. Educational resources are concentrated mainly within campuses, while investment in rural practice platforms, interdisciplinary mentoring teams and safeguards for frontline practice remain inadequate. Regional disparities in educational resources and barriers to the flow of market factors also affect the overall quality of talent cultivation.

Addressing these challenges requires a holistic and systematic approach that moves beyond piecemeal adjustments and places practical education at the center of talent development.

Universities should build practice platforms with comprehensive coverage. For example, Shandong Agricultural University has organized large-scale research initiatives linking tens of thousands of students with rural villages and established rural revitalization service stations. These platforms integrate data collection, technology extension and hands-on training, supported by a system that provides several opportunities for students to engage at the grassroots level.

Meanwhile, a continuous and immersive system for cultivating commitment to agriculture should also be established. Agricultural universities should explore innovative practice-based courses that integrate values education with professional learning, transforming frontline practice platforms into broader classrooms for ideological and civic education.

By ensuring students' sustained participation in rural practice and volunteer services from enrollment through graduation, and by encouraging activities such as annual village-based research, rural development reports and reflections on rural engagement, emotional attachment to agriculture can become tangible, measurable and enduring, evolving from initial emotional resonance to rational identification and a sense of mission.

Innovation is also needed in building full-chain models for integrating industry and education. Practical teaching and academic evaluation systems should be comprehensively restructured around real-world scenarios across the entire agricultural industry chain. Interdisciplinary education teams should be formed, and tiered, integrated training pathways linking undergraduate, master's and doctoral education with industry practice should be explored. Greater emphasis should be placed on students' ability to solve practical problems and make concrete contributions, ensuring deep integration between teaching content and industrial needs, as well as between on-campus learning and frontline practice.

Moreover, diversified and collaborative education mechanisms should be strengthened. Clear co-construction goals should be established among universities, governments, industries and rural communities. A multi-tiered practice platform can be explored, encompassing broad rural cognition and integrated innovation through industrial research institutes. Through institutional innovation, extensive social resources can be systematically transformed into high-quality educational resources, promoting the organic integration of education, science and technology, talent and industry.

Finally, policy support systems should be optimized to better align with practical education needs. Resource allocation should be adjusted to increase investment in rural practice platforms, interdisciplinary teams and on-site participation. Talent evaluation mechanisms should be refined to raise the weight of indicators related to practical contributions and service to industry. High-level coordination mechanisms should be established to promote regional planning alignment, mutual recognition of standards and resource sharing, breaking down barriers to collaborative education and unleashing greater vitality.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.