<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Chinese Perspectives

          Judicial reform critical for modernizing governance

          By Xiong Qiuhong | CHINA DAILY | Updated: 2025-12-24 06:59
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          [Photo/VCG]

          Comprehensively deepening judicial reform is one of the major policy decisions of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in the new era. It is both the cornerstone of all-round reform and the central pillar of advancing the rule of law. Reform is critical for improving the socialist judicial system with Chinese characteristics and modernizing China's governance system.

          In the new era, China's judicial reform has focused sharply on enhancing judicial credibility. With the goal of establishing a fair, efficient and authoritative socialist judicial system, reform has rolled out comprehensive supporting measures while ensuring that the people feel fairness and justice in every judicial case.

          Philosophy guides China's judicial reform in the new era. It begins with a people-centered approach, with fairness, transparency, efficiency, and authority as its core principles.

          Justice is essential in judicial work. As Xi Jinping, general secretary of the CPC Central Committee, emphasized at a session of the Political Bureau of the CPC Central Committee in February 2013, it is imperative to uphold justice to comprehensively advance the rule of law. Impartial justice is society's last line of defense. It ensures that infringed rights are protected, unlawful conduct is sanctioned and criminal activities are punished. If people cannot secure their legitimate rights through judicial procedures, the judicial system will lose credibility.

          The law is meant to resolve disputes and clarify rights and obligations, while judicial rulings are intended to provide finality. If justice is compromised and public trust erodes, these functions cannot be fulfilled.

          Judicial justice encompasses both substantive and procedural justice, as well as justice at the collective and individual levels. Judicial justice is regarded as an objective form of justice. Xi emphasized that efforts have been made to ensure that the people feel fairness and justice in each and every judicial case. His remark embodies the philosophy that emphasizes both objective and subjective justice, as well as collective and individual justice, thereby enriching the concept of judicial fairness with new dimensions.

          Transparency plays a vital role in judicial justice. Judicial transparency is not only a requirement of judicial democracy but also an inherent demand of the judicial system itself. It enables public oversight of the judiciary, encourages fair handling of cases and helps prevent malpractices that may arise in opaque operations.

          Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, efforts to enhance judicial transparency have accelerated significantly. The scope of information disclosed has continued to expand, methods of disclosure have been innovated and relevant mechanisms have been improved.

          Judicial efficiency concerns not only the rational allocation of judicial resources but also the timely realization of fairness and justice. With the political, economic and social development in China, the volume of cases has increased, making the increase in judicial efficiency a major challenge for the authorities.

          To enhance efficiency, it is essential to refine mechanisms for differentiating and streamlining case procedures while also improving the diversified dispute resolution system for social conflicts. As traditional case-handling approaches reach their limits, it is crucial to leverage technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence to empower the judiciary. This technological integration will help ensure that justice is not delayed.

          Judicial credibility underpins judicial authority, and judicial authority reflects judicial credibility in action. Only when judicial organs exercise their powers independently and impartially in accordance with the law and judicial officers demonstrate competence and integrity, will judicial decisions carry persuasive force and earn the trust of the public.

          Upholding judicial authority requires respecting the finality and binding effect of judicial adjudication and ensuring that legally effective judgments serve their fundamental purpose of resolving disputes and bringing closure to conflicts.

          China's judicial system reform has prioritized four foundational initiatives: improving the classified management of judicial personnel, refining the judicial responsibility system, strengthening professional safeguards for judicial officers, and promoting the unified management of human, financial and material resources for local courts and procuratorates below the provincial level.

          These reforms are critical for safeguarding the independent and impartial exercise of judicial authority in accordance with the law.

          Refining the judicial responsibility system — including the responsibility mechanisms for presiding judges, collegial panels and prosecutors — clarifies the powers and duties of judges and prosecutors in case adjudication. With lifelong accountability for the cases they handle and strict scrutiny of wrongful judgments, this contributes to a well-defined, balanced and orderly operation of judicial authority.

          Strengthening professional safeguards for judicial personnel involves special provisions — distinct from those for ordinary civil servants — regarding salaries, tenure, immunity, discipline and removal from office. These safeguards reflect the social dignity, professional nature and risks associated with judicial roles, and symbolize the elevated social status of judges and prosecutors among public servants.

          Through persistent efforts, the judicial reform outlined by the CPC Central Committee has been effectively implemented, giving shape to a fair, efficient and authoritative socialist judicial system with Chinese characteristics. The public's sense of fulfillment and satisfaction with the judiciary has significantly increased, and the journey toward judicial modernization has grown more robust and steadfast.

          The author is the dean of the Procedural Law Research Institute at China University of Political Science and Law.

          The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.

          If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧洲日韩国内高清| 永久免费无码国产| 17岁高清完整版在线观看| 天堂av色综合久久天堂| 微拍福利一区二区三区| 人妻无码AⅤ中文字幕视频| 久久精品丝袜高跟鞋| 亚洲综合在线一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲二区在线看| 久久月本道色综合久久| 国产亚洲精品久久yy50| 国产播放91色在线观看| 中文字幕无字幕加勒比| 国产精品分类视频分类一区| 日韩中av免费在线观看| 亚洲一区二区三区18禁| 亚洲精品成人一二三专区| 中文字幕 欧美日韩| 五月天中文字幕mv在线| 国产黄色大片网站| 欧美日韩午夜| 国产成熟妇女性视频电影| 日韩激情无码av一区二区| 日韩有码av中文字幕| 亚洲国产日韩在线成人蜜芽| 宅男噜噜噜66在线观看| 一本之道高清无码视频| 亚洲国产永久精品成人麻豆| 九九九久久国产精品| 亚洲一区二区啊射精日韩| 亚洲av久久精品狠狠爱av| 国产成人无码A区在线观看视频| 色婷婷婷丁香亚洲综合| 成av人电影在线观看| 欧美不卡无线在线一二三区观| 亚洲情综合五月天| 毛片无遮挡高清免费| 秋霞在线观看片无码免费不卡| 亚洲精品综合网二三区| 我们高清观看免费中国片| 国产精品不卡一二三区 |