No moral ground for Pompeo’s media curbs

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo is a man on a roll, a negative roll. On March 2, he imposed, by fiat, arbitrary limits on Chinese journalists in the US.

Americans who don’t seem to mind it when their orange-tinted hero incites hate by calling journalists “the enemy of the people” generally cheered the announcement. Anti-China agitators mostly claimed vindication, but even a veteran human rights activist was moved to write: “Petty, short sighted, and hardly an assist for press freedom anywhere, especially in China.”

Simply put, the United States’ free-speech advocates were aghast.

Pompeo’s claims on free speech and fair play ring especially hollow given his trampling of the same. He abuses journalists, lacks accountability and looks the other way when his boss rouses crowds to shout “fake news” and “lock’em up” at those who dare to disagree.

Even more horrifying, given the novel coronavirus outbreak, is the way the US administration has been muzzling scientific experts, lying about statistics and seeking to control the flow of critical public health information. The US administration anointed the obsequious vice-president as coronavirus czar, not because Mike Pence has expertise, but because, in the US leader’s own cavalier words, “he doesn’t have anything else to do”.

Yet Pompeo crows on about the US as a nation that can do no wrong. Never has the cherished idea of “free press” rung so hollow as when emitted by the lips of so undemocratic a public servant.

On Thursday, Pompeo was at it again. “A free press helps expose corruption and protect the people from cover-ups,” he proclaimed. This is richly ironic in the wake of an impeachment trial brimming with evidence of corruption and cover-ups. Pompeo has no moral ground to be preaching anything to anyone. “We lie, we cheat, we steal,” was his mantra at the CIA and he’s continued to be underhanded in his obsessive zeal for hurting China and Iran. When it comes to his hard-core, unquestioning support of his boss, he acts like a crime consigliere.

Although coronavirus is the dominant story of the moment, US Twitter commentators were quick to chide Pompeo for hollering from his high horse about denying journalist visas to make Beijing “respect freedom of expression.”

The tweetstorm was swift and from the hip.

* We urge YOU to respect freedom of expression … and while you’re at it ... resign!

* We urge Beijing to respect freedom of expression even though the US administration does all it can not to. Give me a break.

* So capping a foreign media group is giving them freedom of expression? In what universe does that make any sense???

One commentator noted that Pompeo is destroying the law of the land in the US while demanding that “other countries obey the laws (he’s) decided they should respect”.

Another pundit referred to Pompeo’s groundless firing of upstanding State Department diplomats who got in the way of his corrupt shenanigans in Ukraine, and his subsequent attempt to cover-up the same by bullying NPR journalists who wanted to investigate the story.

* Have you had a chance to apologize to NPR’s Mary Louis Kelly yet for accusing her of lying? And have you made a public statement thanking Ambassadors (Bill) Taylor and (Marie) Yovonavitch (to Ukraine) for their service and integrity yet?

For a more nuanced discussion of the US-China tit-for-tat strictures being placed on journalists, one finds a calming plea for restraint and tolerance in the words of Anthony Kuhn, a long-time China reporter for NPR. He’s a front-line journalist at risk, but he finds no comfort in Pompeo’s rash actions.

“Remind me now, who is the ‘enemy of the people?’” Kuhn slyly asks in reaction to Pompeo’s cap on China journalists. He adds that weaponizing journalist visas is not a good way to champion press freedom, noting that such an action is unlikely to level the playing field.

Kuhn concludes his discussions on Twitter, arguing that tit-for-tat actions are counter-productive, for they “undermine our advocacy of press freedoms and empower those who violate them.”

Whether it be war, or a high-stakes tit-for-tat diplomatic spat, or more mundane human quarrels, human frailty typically leads both sides to justify their behavior by pointing to the other.

But there is another way. Upholding one’s beliefs and acting in accord with them is not inaction but action of a different dimension. Given the state of crisis the world is in today, and the not inconsiderable possibility of diplomatic collapse, taking the high road is not just a good option, it’s the best way.

The author is a media researcher covering Asian issues.

The views don't necessarily reflect those of China Daily.