<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Little problem in levying real estate tax

          By Jia Kang | China Daily | Updated: 2018-01-12 08:44
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          Real estate tax is a popular topic of discussion these days, with some people saying it is difficult to levy real estate tax in China because land property rights in the countries that have imposed such a tax belong to individuals, not to the State as in China.

          But not all land in foreign countries belongs to individuals. In the United Kingdom for example, both private land and public land exist, and public land there belongs to various levels of government or public bodies. According to the England land law that covers England and Wales, there are two types of housing and land relationship. The first is freehold-a freeholder with property right over land can be either a single person or a group of people. The second is leasehold, in which the property right to housing is limited to just using the land, not owning it. Scotland and Northern Ireland have similar laws, the real estate tax in the UK, called Council tax, is imposed on both freehold and leasehold properties.

          Some people in China also argue that the real estate tax is actually a "double tax", because the housing price includes the land price. But land price is rental and should not be confused with real estate tax. In today's multiple tax system, whether or not a real estate tax should be levied depends on whether an economy can strike the right balance between land rental and real estate tax.

          Moreover, levying of real estate tax may help prevent housing prices from shooting through the roof owing to sky-high land prices, as seen in the past.

          Another group of people argue that it is not feasible to impose real estate tax. For instance, a scholar said at a recent forum that it may take China up to 150 years to levy real estate tax nationwide because it has to first solve the tax base assessment problem, which is very complicated.

          But China launched a pilot program for collecting property tax more than one decade ago. Aimed at untying the knots in the tax base assessment mechanism, the pilot program was launched in six cities, and has now been extended to 10 more cities.

          My research shows it is possible to access all the basic immovable property data, upload them on the computer system, and use software to assess property tax.

          There are also people who ask how can the limited property housing problem be solved if real estate tax is levied. I tried to deal with the limited property housing problem through real estate tax reform. In fact, a pilot project has been launched in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to solve the problem.

          To reform the real estate tax system, first we need to expedite legislation, as statutory taxation is vital to tax reform-and legislation is expected to be completed within the five years of the next National People's Congress, China's top legislature.

          Second, real estate tax should be levied in accordance with China's actual conditions and stage of development. Besides, opinions from different walks of society should be solicited before finalizing the real estate tax law, as it would enable people from different strata of society to voice their demands and give their suggestions. This means the tax reform should be in accordance with the "greatest common divisor" of the legal framework.

          Third, related tax reforms should also be considered, because real estate tax or immovable property tax is a general concept that includes different types of taxes related to the real estate sector. The central government's decision to accelerate legislation of real estate tax and promote tax reform mainly refers to the narrowly defined immovable property tax in the holding process. As such, the most important job for this year is to establish a foolproof immovable property registration system.

          And fourth, we should be fully prepared to deal with the difficulties that may arise in the legislation process, and actively promote consensus among various parties.

          The author is director of the China Academy of New Supply-side Economics, and former director of the Institute for Fiscal Science Research under the Ministry of Finance.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品久久久久乳精品爆| 亚洲老熟女一区二区三区 | 日本一区二区三区黄色网| 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频 | 最新可播放男同志69gay| 久久久久亚洲av成人网址| 国产亚洲精品第一综合另类| 夜夜摸日日摸视频| 精品亚洲AⅤ无码午夜在线| A男人的天堂久久A毛片| 国语精品国内自产视频| 全免费A级毛片免费看无码| av日韩在线一区二区三区| 亚洲中少妇久久中文字幕| 亚洲av激情一区二区三区| 精品人妻日韩中文字幕| 玩弄丰满少妇人妻视频| 成人拍拍拍无遮挡免费视频| 亚洲中文字幕国产精品| 亚洲AV永久无码一区| 日本欧美一区二区免费视频| 激情国产一区二区三区四区| 国产成人高清亚洲综合| 成全电影大全在线观看| 色老头亚洲成人免费影院| 99久久亚洲综合精品成人网| 精品国产线拍大陆久久尤物| 欧美经典人人爽人人爽人人片 | 欧美黑人性暴力猛交在线视频| 亚洲一区二区三区中文字幕5566| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉综合图片| 五月丁香在线视频| 日韩国产av一区二区三区精品 | 亚洲精品无码AV人在线观看国产| 又爽又黄又无遮挡网站| 国产一区精品综亚洲av| 国产一区二区在线有码| 欧美激情内射喷水高潮| 久久18禁高潮出水呻吟娇| 亚洲精品va| 国产精品熟女乱色一区二区 |