<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Little problem in levying real estate tax

          By Jia Kang | China Daily | Updated: 2018-01-12 08:44
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          Real estate tax is a popular topic of discussion these days, with some people saying it is difficult to levy real estate tax in China because land property rights in the countries that have imposed such a tax belong to individuals, not to the State as in China.

          But not all land in foreign countries belongs to individuals. In the United Kingdom for example, both private land and public land exist, and public land there belongs to various levels of government or public bodies. According to the England land law that covers England and Wales, there are two types of housing and land relationship. The first is freehold-a freeholder with property right over land can be either a single person or a group of people. The second is leasehold, in which the property right to housing is limited to just using the land, not owning it. Scotland and Northern Ireland have similar laws, the real estate tax in the UK, called Council tax, is imposed on both freehold and leasehold properties.

          Some people in China also argue that the real estate tax is actually a "double tax", because the housing price includes the land price. But land price is rental and should not be confused with real estate tax. In today's multiple tax system, whether or not a real estate tax should be levied depends on whether an economy can strike the right balance between land rental and real estate tax.

          Moreover, levying of real estate tax may help prevent housing prices from shooting through the roof owing to sky-high land prices, as seen in the past.

          Another group of people argue that it is not feasible to impose real estate tax. For instance, a scholar said at a recent forum that it may take China up to 150 years to levy real estate tax nationwide because it has to first solve the tax base assessment problem, which is very complicated.

          But China launched a pilot program for collecting property tax more than one decade ago. Aimed at untying the knots in the tax base assessment mechanism, the pilot program was launched in six cities, and has now been extended to 10 more cities.

          My research shows it is possible to access all the basic immovable property data, upload them on the computer system, and use software to assess property tax.

          There are also people who ask how can the limited property housing problem be solved if real estate tax is levied. I tried to deal with the limited property housing problem through real estate tax reform. In fact, a pilot project has been launched in Shenzhen, Guangdong province, to solve the problem.

          To reform the real estate tax system, first we need to expedite legislation, as statutory taxation is vital to tax reform-and legislation is expected to be completed within the five years of the next National People's Congress, China's top legislature.

          Second, real estate tax should be levied in accordance with China's actual conditions and stage of development. Besides, opinions from different walks of society should be solicited before finalizing the real estate tax law, as it would enable people from different strata of society to voice their demands and give their suggestions. This means the tax reform should be in accordance with the "greatest common divisor" of the legal framework.

          Third, related tax reforms should also be considered, because real estate tax or immovable property tax is a general concept that includes different types of taxes related to the real estate sector. The central government's decision to accelerate legislation of real estate tax and promote tax reform mainly refers to the narrowly defined immovable property tax in the holding process. As such, the most important job for this year is to establish a foolproof immovable property registration system.

          And fourth, we should be fully prepared to deal with the difficulties that may arise in the legislation process, and actively promote consensus among various parties.

          The author is director of the China Academy of New Supply-side Economics, and former director of the Institute for Fiscal Science Research under the Ministry of Finance.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 福利视频在线播放| 国产一区二区三区在线看| 国产精品理论片| 精品videossexfreeohdbbw| 日本55丰满熟妇厨房伦| 欧美精品一产区二产区| 色窝窝免费播放视频在线| 中国熟妇毛多多裸交视频| 国产成人亚洲综合A∨在线播放| 99久久99视频只有精品| 亚洲最大av一区二区| 久久午夜色播影院| 人妻另类 专区 欧美 制服| 亚洲免费日韩一区二区| 日韩精品18禁一区二区| 国产在线播放专区av| 国产做爰xxxⅹ久久久| 久久麻豆成人精品| 国语精品国内自产视频| 日韩高清视频 一区二区| 国产激情精品一区二区三区| 亚洲精品人成网线在播放VA| 中文字幕久久久久人妻中出| 亚洲国产欧美在线看片一国产| 小泽玛利亚一区二区在线观看| 婷婷六月天在线| 亚洲一区二区三区水蜜桃| 综合激情亚洲丁香社区| 亚洲午夜香蕉久久精品| 国产香蕉精品视频一区二区三区| 国产一级黄色片在线播放| 欧洲精品色在线观看| 中文无码vr最新无码av专区| 日本一区二区三区福利视频| 久久综合色之久久综合| 国产精品人成在线播放蜜臀| 5D肉蒲团之性战奶水欧美| 免费人成网上在线观看网址| 国产精品自线在线播放| 毛片一区二区在线看| 亚洲一区在线观看青青蜜臀 |