Global General

Special

Newsmaker

Asia Pacific

America

Middle East

Europe

Africa

Gates endorses new US bomber project

(Agencies)
Updated: 2009-09-17 13:25

US Defense Secretary Robert Gates speaks to reporters at Lockheed Martin's production plant for the F-35 fighter aircraft in Fort Worth, Texas August 31, 2009. [Agencies]

NATIONAL HARBOR, Maryland: Defense Secretary Robert Gates threw his support on Wednesday behind an on-again, off-again plan to develop a new long-range US bomber.

"I am committed to seeing the United States has an airborne long-range strike capability," Gates said at an annual conference of the US Air Force Association, an advocacy group.

Related readings:  Gates: Afghan war 'not slipping through' Obama's fingers  Gates open to possible troop request in Afghanistan  Obama, Gates, policeman pledge to try and move on  Gates announces temporary increase in US Army

As recently as April, Gates pulled the plug on a potential $15 billion effort to build a new bomber to follow the radar-evading B-2, designed by Northrop Grumman Corp in the 1980s.

"We will not pursue a development program for a follow-on Air Force bomber until we have a better understanding of the need, the requirement, and the technology," Gates said on April 6 while outlining his priorities for the fiscal 2010 defense budget.

He said at the time the issue would be examined as part of the Quadrennial Defense Review, the Pentagon's blueprint for the next four years.

In endorsing a follow-on bomber on Wednesday, "a prospective B-3, if you will," Gates noted the congressionally mandated review was still under way.

But he said whatever system might be chosen to meet the requirement - whether manned, unmanned or some combination of the two - "it should be one that realistically can be produced in the numbers originally envisioned."

The B-2 ended up costing some $2 billion each, because less than one-sixth of a planned 132-bomber fleet were built.

The Air Force has been keen to develop a new long-range strike capability by 2018, an effort likely to cost at least $15 billion, according to Barry Watts, a defense expert at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, a research group in Washington DC.

The future bomber likely would need an unrefueled combat radius of 2,500 nautical miles, measured from the last mid-air refueling spot in "friendly" air space, Watts said in a telephone interview.

In January 2008, Boeing Co and Lockheed Martin Corp announced they would partner in pursuit of an anticipated US Air Force "next-generation" bomber program.

As the incumbent, Northrop Grumman looks forward to competing to bring its know-how to bear on the B-2's replacement, said Randy Belote, a company spokesman.