<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          WORLD> Top News
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2009-09-02 04:52

          WASHINGTON: Google Inc's plan to digitize millions of books would violate German copyright law and the country's privacy protections for Internet users, the German government said in a US court filing.

          Germany opposes a proposed settlement, which Google reached with the Authors Guild and Association of American Publishers Inc among others in October 2008, because Google could digitize books by German authors without their consent, according to filing dated Monday.

          It was signed by Johannes Christian Wichard, deputy director general of the Directorate Commercial and Economic Law, in Germany's Justice Ministry.

          Wichard said the deal would allow Google to "flout German laws that have been established to protect German authors and publishers, including with respect to digital copying, publishing and the dissemination of their works."

          "The decision of this court with respect to this settlement will have the dramatic and long-range effect of creating a new worldwide copyright regime without any input from those who will be greatly impacted -- German authors, publishers and digital libraries and German citizens," he said, noting that German authors not published in the United States were not represented by the Authors Guild.

          Under the settlement, authors have until the end of this week to tell Google that they do not want their books digitized. A hearing on approval of the settlement is set for Oct 7 in Manhattan federal court.

          Critics have said the deal would allow Google -- and only Google -- to digitize so-called orphan works, which could pose an antitrust concern. Orphan works are books or other materials that are still covered by US copyright law, but it is not clear who owns the rights to them.

          Wichard also noted clashes between Google's plans and German requirements that Internet users' privacy be ensured.

          Related readings:
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google dials into Apple's territory
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google launches rare ad campaign to sell more apps
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google to smash Windows monopoly
          Germany: Google book deal violates copyright law Google trial in Italy: freedom v. responsibility

          "By failing to ensure similar or adequate privacy protections, the settlement violates well-established national and international privacy laws," Wichard wrote.

          The digitizing deal has divided the tech, publishing and antitrust worlds.

          Google's rivals Microsoft Corp and Yahoo Inc oppose the deal while the American Library Association and Association of Research Libraries asked for court oversight. They fear the deal gives Google the unimpeded ability to set prices for libraries, once they scan books and put them on the Internet. If the service becomes a necessity for libraries they would face monopoly pricing, Google's opponents say.

          The US Justice Department is investigating the deal while European Union antitrust enforcers, prompted by Germany, have said they would study it.

          In Brussels, the European Union's media commissioner, Viviane Reding, welcomed Google's initiative. "It is good to see that new business models are evolving which could allow bringing more content to an increasing number of consumers," Reding said in a statement last week.

          The proposed settlement would settle a lawsuit filed in 2005 by the Authors Guild. The Guild and a group of publishers had alleged copyright infringement.

          Google has agreed to pay $125 million to create a Book Rights Registry, where authors and publishers can register works and receive compensation.

          The case is Authors Guild et al v Google Inc 05-08136 in US District Court for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan).

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本一区二区三本视频在线观看| 欧美自拍另类欧美综合图片区| 国产在线午夜不卡精品影院| 日韩不卡在线观看视频不卡| 男人扒开添女人下部免费视频| 日韩亚洲欧美中文高清| 国产亚洲综合欧美视频| 强奷乱码欧妇女中文字幕熟女| 午夜三级成人在线观看| 亚洲一区二区中文av| 日本黄页网站免费观看| 一本色道婷婷久久欧美| 亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另类| 精品久久久久久无码专区不卡 | 97精品伊人久久久大香线蕉| 日韩秘 无码一区二区三区 | 天天澡夜夜澡狠狠久久| 国内揄拍国内精品少妇国语| 国产乱沈阳女人高潮乱叫老| 免费看婬乱a欧美大片| 亚洲精品天天影视综合网| 亚洲色图狠狠干| 97精品亚成在人线免视频| 国产SUV精品一区二区88L| 欧美牲交a欧美牲交aⅴ图片| mm1313亚洲国产精品无吗| 国产伦一区二区三区久久| 中文字幕日韩精品亚洲一区| 久久99精品久久久久久| 野花香电视剧免费观看全集高清播放| 久久久久久久久久久久中文字幕| 亚洲色大成网站WWW国产| 国产福利2021最新在线观看| 人妻系列无码专区免费| 亚洲av产在线精品亚洲第一站 | 两个人的视频高清在线观看免费 | 人妻在厨房被色诱中文字幕| 一区二区中文字幕久久| 国产91麻豆免费观看| 亚洲欧洲av一区二区久久| 国产成人精品久久一区二|