<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          WORLD> America
          AIG bonuses: Some repaid, Congress to vote on tax
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2009-03-19 08:23

          AIG Chairmen Edward Liddy testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, March 18, 2009, before the House Capital Markets, Insurance and Government Sponsored Enterprises subcommittee. [Agencies] 

          "The fact is that the bill the president signed, which protected the AIG bonuses and others, was written behind closed doors by Democratic leaders of the House and Senate. There was no transparency," said Sen. Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, the senior Republican on the Senate Finance Committee.

          On Wednesday, Sen. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, acknowledged that his staff agreed to dilute an executive compensation provision that would have applied retroactively to recipients of federal aid. Dodd told CNN the request came from officials at the Treasury Department whom he did not identify.

          While the House and Senate reconciled their stimulus bills last month, the Treasury Department expressed concern with a Senate restriction on bonuses, noting that if it applied to existing compensation contracts it could face a legal challenge.

          Related readings:
           Geithner tells AIG: It's payback time
           AIG chairman inherits retention bonus mess
           Livid Democrats demand AIG return bailout bonuses
           Obama berates AIG, vows to block bonuses

          "The alternative was losing, in my view, the entire section on executive excessive compensation," Dodd told CNN. "Given a choice — this is not an uncommon occurrence here — I agreed to a modification in the legislation, reluctantly."

          The legislation does include a provision that allows the Treasury Department to examine past compensation payments to determine whether they were "contrary to the public interest." Geithner on Tuesday said he was using that provision to review AIG's bonuses.

          Liddy's presence in a congressional hearing room was evidence of a bipartisan opposition to the bonuses, although his status as a $1-a-year CEO called out of retirement last year to try and untangle AIG's financial mess made him a less-than-easy target for expressions of outrage.

          "No one knows better than I that AIG has been the recipient of generous amounts of government financial aid," he said. "We have been the beneficiary of the American people's forbearance and patience," he added, acknowledging the patience was wearing thin.

          Asked by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., whether he would turn over the names of individuals who received the bonuses, as well as the amounts, Liddy said he would do so only if assured the information not be made public.

          When Frank said he might seek a subpoena, Liddy said he was concerned about the safety of the employees and their families, and read aloud from a death threat received by one of them.

          Frank said he would be guided in part by security considerations, but Ackerman later noted that Andrew Cuomo, the New York attorney general, was already seeking the names with a subpoena.

          Liddy said he had not yet complied, sidestepped several times when asked whether he would, and finally said "it would be our intent" to do so.

          Cuomo swiftly issued a statement saying Liddy's pledge was "simply too little, too late. ... Rather than take half-measures, AIG should immediately turn over the list, which we have subpoenaed, of who got what and when."

          Separately, a New York state judge ordered Bank of America Corp. to disclose information about bonuses given to employees at Merrill Lynch & Co. just before the bank bought the brokerage company. Cuomo, who has been sparring with the bank over release of the information, said the decision "will now lift the shroud of secrecy surrounding the $3.6 billion in premature bonuses Merrill Lynch rushed out in early December."

          "AIG should take heed and immediately turn over the list of bonus recipients we have subpoenaed," he said. "The deadline for responding to our subpoena is tomorrow. "

          AIG spokesman Mark Herr said he could not say how many executives had turned back the money. "Bear in mind, these bonuses were only just paid," he said.

          In Wilton, Conn., headquarters of AIG Financial Products Corp., police chief Edward Kulhawik said his department had not received any reports from the company of threats to employees but was in contact with the company and keeping "a special eye on that whole office complex."

          Liddy said the Federal Reserve knew long in advance of the bonus payments and acquiesced in them, noting that officials from the independent agency attend key company meetings. But he said the same was not true of Geithner, adding, "We do our work with the Federal Reserve."

          Liddy gave skeptical committee members what amounted to a tutorial in the practice of paying retention bonuses — he did not call them that — to executives.

          He said the money was offered to executives in AIG's financial products section, where risky investments finally became the entire company's undoing. He said each executive was offered money to dispose of his "business book," meaning the transactions he had been in charge of handling, and thus far, the company's financial derivatives had been reduced from $2.7 trillion to $1.6 trillion.

          He had decided it was worth paying the money to retain the services of executives who knew the business best, he said. And he had received legal advice that there were valid contracts requiring the payments.

          "I know 165 million is a very large number. It's a very large number. In the context of 1.6 trillion ... we thought it was a good trade," he said.

          Liddy added there was still a risk of financial catastrophe if the remaining $1.6 trillion in financial instruments were not disposed of properly.

          But Rep. Stephen Lynch, D-Mass., angrily told the witness the contract read like "the captain and the crew of the ship reserving the lifeboats."

          Liddy replied that he was not at the firm when the contracts were negotiated, and said, as he has before, that he would not have approved them.

          Lynch said the terms had been put in place in December, after Liddy arrived at AIG.

          But Liddy disputed that. "I take offense, Sir," he said.

          "Well you take it rightly. Offense was intended," shot back Lynch.

             Previous page 1 2 Next Page  

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕日韩有码av| 蜜桃视频在线观看网站免费| 精品熟女少妇av免费观看| 亚洲区综合区小说区激情区| 五月婷网站| 亚洲精品三区二区一区一| 亚洲aⅴ综合av国产八av| 亚洲一区二区三区影院| 国产成人精品一区二区无| 国产系列丝袜熟女精品视频 | 国产成人AV无码精品天堂| 国产一区二区午夜福利久久| 精品免费看国产一区二区| 国产精品午夜福利视频| 久久一级精品久熟女人妻| 国产男人的天堂在线视频| 久久精品超碰AV无码| 日本一区三区高清视频| 国产成人亚洲综合app网站| 麻豆a级片| 日韩高清国产中文字幕| 1769国产在线观看免费视频 | 亚洲天堂领先自拍视频网| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合5g| 国产精品店无码一区二区三区| 国产毛片子一区二区三区| 永久免费无码网站在线观看个| 夜夜偷天天爽夜夜爱| 亚洲春色在线视频| 亚洲AV无码久久精品日韩| 一区二区和激情视频| 中国xxxx真实偷拍| 久久碰国产一区二区三区| 亚洲免费视频一区二区三区| 欧美日产国产精品日产| 久久精品国产蜜臀av| 欧美va亚洲va香蕉在线| 亚洲精品中文字幕一二三| 国产亚洲tv在线观看| 日本阿v片在线播放免费| 无套后入极品美女少妇|