<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          WORLD> America
          FDA allows trace amounts of chemical in baby formula
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2008-11-29 15:33

          WASHINGTON -- US regulators set a safety threshold Friday for the industrial chemical melamine that is greater than the amount of contamination found so far in US-made infant formula.

          US Food and Drug Administration officials set a threshold of 1 part per million of melamine in formula, provided a related chemical isn't present. They insisted the formulas are safe.


          Chemist Michael Filigenzi demonstrates how vials of liquefied pet food are placed in trays for testing for the industrial chemical melamine at the California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory, at the University of California, Davis, campus in Davis, Calif., November 18, 2008. Traces of melamine have been detected in samples of top-selling U.S infant formula. [Agencies] 



          The setting of the standard comes days after it was reported that FDA tests had found traces of melamine in the infant formula of one major US manufacturer and cyanuric acid, a chemical relative, in the formula of a second major maker. The contaminated samples, which both measured at levels below the new standard, had been analyzed several weeks ago.

          The FDA had stated in early October that it was unable to set a safety contamination level for melamine in infant formula.

          Though Dr. Stephen Sundlof, FDA's director of food safety, said Friday that there had been no new scientific studies since October that would give regulators more safety data, he said the agency was confident in setting the 1 part per million level for either of the chemicals alone. The level is the same as public health officials have set in Canada and China.

          Sundlof emphasized that neither of the two tainted samples had both contaminants. He had no ready explanation for why the level wasn't set earlier.

          Sundlof said the lack of dual contamination was key because studies so far show dangerous health effects only when both chemicals are present.

          The agency still will not set a safety level for melamine if cyanuric acid is also present, he said.

          "The levels were so low ... that they do not cause a health risk to infants," Sundlof said. "Parents using infant formula should continue using US-manufactured infant formula. Switching away from one of these infant formulas to alternate diets or homemade formulas could result in infants not receiving the complete nutrition required for proper growth and development."

          Reacting to news of the contaminated formulas, members of Congress, a national consumer group and the Illinois attorney general have demanded a national recall, something the FDA said made no sense because it had no evidence suggesting that the formula would be dangerous for babies at the levels of contamination found.

          After saying it made an error in its data, the FDA on Wednesday produced these results: Nestle's Good Start Supreme Infant Formula with Iron had two positive tests for melamine on one sample; Mead Johnson's Infant Formula Powder, Enfamil LIPIL with Iron had three positive tests on one sample for cyanuric acid.

          Separately, a third major formula maker, Abbott Laboratories, said that in-house tests had detected trace levels of melamine in its infant formula.

          Those three formula makers manufacture more than 90 percent of all infant formula produced in the United States.

          The FDA said it had analyzed 74 samples and was continuing to examine 13 more.

          The agency had left the impression of a zero tolerance on Oct. 3 when it stated: "FDA is currently unable to establish any level of melamine and melamine-related compounds in infant formula that does not raise public health concerns."

          The FDA and other experts said the melamine contamination in US-made formula had occurred during the manufacturing process, rather than intentionally. The US government quietly began testing domestically produced infant formula in September, soon after problems with melamine-spiked formula surfaced in China.

          Melamine can legally be used in some food packaging, and can rub off into food from there. It's also part of a cleaning solution used on some food processing equipment.

          There is a gap between the concentration that the FDA detected in formula and the agency's estimate of how much melamine could contaminate food from the manufacturing process. The expected contamination from processing, 15 parts per billion, is about one-tenth the amount that the agency has detected in infant formula. FDA officials have not responded to questions this week about how that gap might be explained.

          The agency said it is continuing research on animals to see the effects of ingesting both melamine and cyanuric acid.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 挺进朋友人妻雪白的身体韩国电影| 四虎在线成人免费观看| 国产精品久久久久aaaa| 99e久热只有精品8在线直播| 久久国产精品无码网站| 国产精品黄色片在线观看| 无码AV无码免费一区二区| 国产福利2021最新在线观看| 亚洲精品综合网二三区| 日韩大片在线永久免费观看网站| 中文字幕在线观看国产双飞高清| 亚洲一区二区三区在线激情| 日韩内射美女人妻一区二区三区 | 大尺度国产一区二区视频| 成年午夜免费韩国做受视频| 欧美亚洲国产日韩电影在线| 久久精品色妇熟女丰满| 绯色蜜臀av一区二区不卡| 欧美性群另类交| 在线一区二区三区视频观看| 亚洲高清 一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇丰满xxxxx小品| 亚洲av本道一区二区| 麻豆最新国产AV原创精品| 老司机精品福利在线资源| 韩国无码AV片午夜福利| 亚洲久热无码av中文字幕| 久久国产成人av蜜臀| 国产区精品系列在线观看| 亚洲av中文乱码一区二| 国产又猛又爽又黄视频| 国产亚洲精品成人aa片新蒲金 | 午夜福利高清在线观看| 亚洲成AV人片在线观高清| 中文文字幕文字幕亚洲色| 亚洲天堂av在线免费看| 国产精品久久久天天影视香蕉 | 亚洲国产精品人人做人人爱| 午夜性色一区二区三区不卡视频 | 国产视频 视频一区二区| 国产精品久久久久久久9999|