<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             

          US OK'd troop terror hunts in Pakistan

          (AP)
          Updated: 2007-08-24 17:08

          Newly uncovered "rules of engagement" show the US military gave elite units broad authority more than three years ago to pursue suspected terrorists into Pakistan, with no mention of telling the Pakistanis in advance.

          The documents show what Army Rangers and other terrorist-hunting units were authorized to do earlier in the war on terror. Some of those same guidelines have remained in place, such as the right to "hot pursuit" across the border.

          Washington repeated assurances it would consult before any such incursions.

          But summaries of the rules of engagement on the Afghanistan-Pakistan border in April 2004 say chasing al-Qaida leaders across the frontier was fair game.

          One summary states that "Entry into PAK authorized for" the following reasons:

          -"Hot pursuit" of al-Qaida, Taliban and terrorist command-and-control targets "from AFG into Pakistan (must be continuous and uninterrupted)."

          -If the head of US Central Command, which oversees American forces in the Middle East and Central Asia, approved direct action "against The Big 3," listed as Osama bin Laden; his deputy, Ayman al-Zawahri; and Taliban supreme leader Mullah Omar. The three are still believed to be hiding in the border region.

          -If the Defense secretary approved such an incursion.

          Other grounds for incursions into Pakistan, according to this summary, were "personnel recovery," including rescuing troops after the downing of aircraft; and troops "in contact with" the enemy, meaning under fire.

          As for "geographic limits," the memo states: "General rule: penetrate no deeper than 10 km," or 6.2 miles.

          Told of the guidelines, Pakistani military spokesman Maj. Gen. Waheed Arshad said, "This is all nonsense. Pakistan never allowed the coalition forces to enter into our territory while chasing militants. There was no such agreement, there was no such understanding."

          Pentagon spokesman Lt. Col. Todd Vician said this week he could not comment. "As a policy we don't talk about rules of engagement, certainly not about current rules in place for any operations in Afghanistan, Iraq or any other operation," he said.

          The 2004 documents were included among 1,100 pages of investigative documents generated by the Army's probe into the death of NFL player-turned-Ranger Pat Tillman, whose platoon was operating in the region at the time.

          E-mail exchanges between Ranger officers in the documents make no mention of a requirement to inform Pakistan in advance of strikes into that country.

          However, one summary mentions a chain of required notifications, which resulted in Pakistan being apprised - apparently after the fact. One rule says "joint task force commander must inform CENTCOM immediately" and ensure the "Mil Liaison team" in Islamabad was notified.

          Operations officers had a hot line to that liaison office, which would in turn inform Pakistani officials, according to a US officer who served in the region and is knowledgable about operations within Afghanistan during that mid-2004 period. On some occasions, the officer said, Pakistanis would detect ground or air incursions and request explanations from the Americans, who would open inquiries.

          Interviews with officers in the field, and the public statements of top US commanders, indicate similar guidelines remain in place today.

          At a hearing of the Senate Armed Services Committee in March, Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., asked Army Lt. Gen. Douglas Lute, "Do we have to have the approval of the Pakistani government in hot pursuit across the border?"

          No, Lute replied. If US forces spot so much as a "hostile intent" against them and chase the threat toward the border, "then we have all the authorities we need to pursue, either with fires or on the ground, across the border," he said.

          Even a surveillance report of enemy fighters setting up a rocket and pointing it west into Afghanistan is enough to trigger a unilateral military response, said Lute, then the chief operations officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and now President Bush's deputy national security adviser - the "war czar" on Iraq and Afghanistan.

          Lt. Col. David Accetta, spokesman for US troops in Afghanistan, said last week he could not talk about rules of engagement along the Pakistan border. He did say, after an AP reporter informed him of Horrigan's comments, that the rules haven't changed since January, when Horrigan spoke.

          A high-ranking Ranger officer who has served in Afghanistan and is familiar with the current rules of engagement said that if he found himself "in contact" with the enemy at the border, he would feel authorized to chase them into Pakistan. He spoke on condition of anonymity because of the high sensitivity of the U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

          A tribal leader, Momin Khan, said the Americans took away five tribesmen. The Muslim cleric whose home was attacked was not there, but an explosion had killed eight people and wounded nine.

          The US military denied involvement, and Pakistan's chief Army spokesman said he couldn't confirm the raid.

          A week later, the CIA purportedly sent a Predator drone from Afghanistan into Pakistan, unsuccessfully firing missiles at al-Zawahri. The attack missed bin Laden's deputy but reportedly killed four other al-Qaida leaders - although that information was never verified - and 13 villagers. Pakistan officially condemned the attack and said it had no advance notice.

          In recent weeks, top Bush administration officials have staked out sometimes varying positions on the matter of penetrating Pakistani's borders.

          On August 5, Defense Secretary Robert Gates was cautious in describing how US officials would handle an incursion. "I think we would not act without telling (Pakistani President Gen. Pervez Musharraf) what we were planning to do," he said on NBC's "Meet the Press."

          That was far more tentative than what White House homeland security adviser Frances Townsend said last month when asked on Fox News why the US wasn't sending special operations forces and drones into Pakistan.

          "Well, just because we don't speak about things publicly doesn't mean we're not doing many of the things you're talking about," Townsend said. She didn't elaborate.

          On August 5 at Camp David with Afghan President Hamid Karzai, Bush wouldn't say whether he would consult with Pakistan before ordering US forces to act inside that country. "With real actionable intelligence, we will get the job done," Bush said, without elaborating.



          Top World News  
          Today's Top News  
          Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品国产免费av| 欧美偷窥清纯综合图区| 亚洲VA中文字幕无码久久不卡| 亚洲人交乣女bbw| 国产av一区二区久久蜜臀| 国内不卡的一区二区三区| 亚洲精品成人片在线观看| 天下第一社区在线观看| 一区二区三区放荡人妻| 亚洲精品三区四区成人少| 国内精品免费久久久久电影院97| 久热爱精品视频线路一| 久久精品国产最新地址| 亚洲老熟女乱女一区二区| 办公室强奷漂亮少妇视频| 国产小视频免费观看| 亚洲精品天堂成人片AV在线播放| 一本色道国产在线观看二区| 欧美国产日韩在线三区| 国产熟女精品一区二区三区| 无码福利写真片视频在线播放| 久久精品国产6699国产精| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区| 久久亚洲精品情侣| 熟女人妻视频| 亚洲中文字幕伊人久久无码| 一本色道久久东京热| 久久人人爽人人爽人人大片av| 午夜精品极品粉嫩国产尤物 | 国产美熟女乱又伦AV果冻传媒| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽超碰97| 精品国产一区av天美传媒| 国产乱精品一区二区三区| 日韩一区二区三区理伦片| 男人av无码天堂| 日韩大尺度一区二区三区| 日本不卡三区| 国产怡春院无码一区二区| 精品国产福利一区二区| 极品蜜臀黄色在线观看| 在线天堂最新版资源|