<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             

          London bomb plotters get life in prison

          (AP)
          Updated: 2007-07-11 20:39

          LONDON - A judge on Wednesday sentenced four men to life in prison for attempting to bomb London's transit system in July 2005, just two weeks after suicide bombers killed 52 commuters in the city.


          This is a Metropolitan Police handout still from a video of Ramzi Mohammed at an alleged training camp in Cumbria northern England in this May 2004 image. Three men were found guilty Monday of plotting to bomb London's public transport system on July 21, 2005, two weeks after a coordinated suicide bombing attack on the network killed 52 commuters. Ramzi Mohammed, 25, Muktar Said Ibrahim, 29; and Yassin Omar, 26; were convicted of conspiracy to murder. The jury was still deliberating on three co-defendants.[AP]

          Judge Adrian Fulford said the men must spend at least 40 years in jail before becoming eligible for parole. A jury on Monday found Muktar Said Ibrahim, 29; Yassin Omar, 26; Ramzi Mohammed, 25; and Hussain Osman, 28, guilty of conspiracy to murder in an al-Qaida-inspired plot to detonate explosives-filled knapsacks on three subway trains and a bus.

          Two other suspects, Manfo Kwaku Asiedu, 34, and Adel Yahya, 24, will be retried after the jury failed to reach a verdict.

          Prosecutors said the July 21 attacks were a deliberate mirror image of the July 7 transit bombings, though the planning started long before. Fulford said he had considered the possible links between the two groups of bombers - which police suspect but could not prove - when he was deciding on the sentences.

          Also Wednesday, prosecution lawyer Nigel Sweeney told a London court that Asiedu and Yahya must be retried after a jury at their first trial failed to reach a verdict.

          Fulford had dismissed the jury on Tuesday after they said they could not agree on a verdict for Asiedu and Yahya.

          All six defendants denied the charges, saying the devices were duds and their actions a protest against the Iraq war. But police and prosecutors said scientific tests proved the bombs were all viable. They do not know why they did not work.

          Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, the Metropolitan Police anti-terrorism chief, said the four convicted plotters "set out to replicate the horrors that had been inflicted on Londoners on July 7, 2005."

          "The convictions show that the jury rejected the blatant, indeed ridiculous, lies told by these defendants in a futile attempt to escape justice," he said.

          During the six-month trial, prosecutors said Asiedu lost his nerve and abandoned his device in a London park. The device was shown to the jury as evidence during the trial.

          Yahya left Britain for Ethiopia several weeks before the attacks.

          During the trial, Asiedu turned on the others and claimed Ibrahim, the gang's self-proclaimed leader, had wanted the attacks "to be bigger and better" than the July 7 bombs.

          The four convicted men attempted to detonate explosives-laden backpacks on three subway trains and a bus, as in the July 7, 2005, attacks. The devices - made from a volatile mix of hydrogen peroxide and flour - failed to explode, and no one was injured.

          Unlike three of the four July 7 bombers, who were British-born, those in the July 21 plot had come to Britain as youths from places like Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia. Some had become British citizens, while others had refugee status.

          Police believe the planning for the attack started after Ibrahim returned to Britain from a trip to Pakistan in March 2005. He was in that country at the same time as two of the July 7 bombers - Shezhad Tanweer and Mohammed Sidique Khan - but officials do not know if they ever met.

          The judge said he would consider the potential links between the two sets of bombers while he was deciding on the sentences.

          They believe the transit system was not the group's original target, but was chosen following the successful attacks two weeks earlier. The original target is unknown.

          The failed attack sparked a huge police manhunt for the would-be suicide bombers. Much of the prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony and closed-circuit television footage from the targeted subway cars and bus.

          Following the men's arrests, police acknowledged they had video evidence of several of the suspects at a training camp in the northern English countryside taken a year before the attacks but had failed to identify them.

          Ibrahim also had been arrested and charged over a disturbance while he was distributing extremist Islamic pamphlets, but was nonetheless allowed to travel to Pakistan months before the failed attacks.



          Top World News  
          Today's Top News  
          Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产精品VA在线观看香蕉| 国产精品国产亚洲看不卡| chinese熟女老女人hd视频| 亚洲国产精品一区第二页| 久久精品国产只有精品96| 色九九视频| 亚洲av色在线观看国产| 日韩视频中文字幕精品偷拍| 视频一区视频二区卡通动漫| 日本深夜福利在线观看| 无码伊人久久大杳蕉中文无码| 成人国产精品日本在线观看| 免费爆乳精品一区二区| 亚洲欧美色αv在线影视| 国精产品自偷自偷ym使用方法| 男女一级国产片免费视频| 久青草国产在视频在线观看| 国产久9视频这里只有精品| 蜜桃av多人一区二区三区| 亚洲一区 日韩精品 中文字幕| 亚洲人成人网站色www| 99精品国产在热久久无| 熟女系列丰满熟妇AV| 国产日韩在线视看高清视频手机| 国产在视频线精品视频| 九九热视频在线观看视频| 极品无码人妻巨屁股系列| 无遮掩60分钟从头啪到尾| 国产日韩精品欧美一区灰| 福利在线视频一区二区| 777米奇色狠狠俺去啦| 狠狠躁日日躁夜夜躁欧美老妇 | 少妇办公室好紧好爽再浪一点| 国产老女人精品免费视频| 日本欧美午夜| 青草精品在线视频观看| 亚洲精品国产自在现线最新| 日本一区二区三区视频版| 亚洲国产成人精品福利无码| 亚洲国产精品综合久久网络| 亚洲精品国产字幕久久不卡|