<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             

          London bomb plotters get life in prison

          (AP)
          Updated: 2007-07-11 20:39

          LONDON - A judge on Wednesday sentenced four men to life in prison for attempting to bomb London's transit system in July 2005, just two weeks after suicide bombers killed 52 commuters in the city.


          This is a Metropolitan Police handout still from a video of Ramzi Mohammed at an alleged training camp in Cumbria northern England in this May 2004 image. Three men were found guilty Monday of plotting to bomb London's public transport system on July 21, 2005, two weeks after a coordinated suicide bombing attack on the network killed 52 commuters. Ramzi Mohammed, 25, Muktar Said Ibrahim, 29; and Yassin Omar, 26; were convicted of conspiracy to murder. The jury was still deliberating on three co-defendants.[AP]

          Judge Adrian Fulford said the men must spend at least 40 years in jail before becoming eligible for parole. A jury on Monday found Muktar Said Ibrahim, 29; Yassin Omar, 26; Ramzi Mohammed, 25; and Hussain Osman, 28, guilty of conspiracy to murder in an al-Qaida-inspired plot to detonate explosives-filled knapsacks on three subway trains and a bus.

          Two other suspects, Manfo Kwaku Asiedu, 34, and Adel Yahya, 24, will be retried after the jury failed to reach a verdict.

          Prosecutors said the July 21 attacks were a deliberate mirror image of the July 7 transit bombings, though the planning started long before. Fulford said he had considered the possible links between the two groups of bombers - which police suspect but could not prove - when he was deciding on the sentences.

          Also Wednesday, prosecution lawyer Nigel Sweeney told a London court that Asiedu and Yahya must be retried after a jury at their first trial failed to reach a verdict.

          Fulford had dismissed the jury on Tuesday after they said they could not agree on a verdict for Asiedu and Yahya.

          All six defendants denied the charges, saying the devices were duds and their actions a protest against the Iraq war. But police and prosecutors said scientific tests proved the bombs were all viable. They do not know why they did not work.

          Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, the Metropolitan Police anti-terrorism chief, said the four convicted plotters "set out to replicate the horrors that had been inflicted on Londoners on July 7, 2005."

          "The convictions show that the jury rejected the blatant, indeed ridiculous, lies told by these defendants in a futile attempt to escape justice," he said.

          During the six-month trial, prosecutors said Asiedu lost his nerve and abandoned his device in a London park. The device was shown to the jury as evidence during the trial.

          Yahya left Britain for Ethiopia several weeks before the attacks.

          During the trial, Asiedu turned on the others and claimed Ibrahim, the gang's self-proclaimed leader, had wanted the attacks "to be bigger and better" than the July 7 bombs.

          The four convicted men attempted to detonate explosives-laden backpacks on three subway trains and a bus, as in the July 7, 2005, attacks. The devices - made from a volatile mix of hydrogen peroxide and flour - failed to explode, and no one was injured.

          Unlike three of the four July 7 bombers, who were British-born, those in the July 21 plot had come to Britain as youths from places like Eritrea, Ethiopia and Somalia. Some had become British citizens, while others had refugee status.

          Police believe the planning for the attack started after Ibrahim returned to Britain from a trip to Pakistan in March 2005. He was in that country at the same time as two of the July 7 bombers - Shezhad Tanweer and Mohammed Sidique Khan - but officials do not know if they ever met.

          The judge said he would consider the potential links between the two sets of bombers while he was deciding on the sentences.

          They believe the transit system was not the group's original target, but was chosen following the successful attacks two weeks earlier. The original target is unknown.

          The failed attack sparked a huge police manhunt for the would-be suicide bombers. Much of the prosecution's case was based on eyewitness testimony and closed-circuit television footage from the targeted subway cars and bus.

          Following the men's arrests, police acknowledged they had video evidence of several of the suspects at a training camp in the northern English countryside taken a year before the attacks but had failed to identify them.

          Ibrahim also had been arrested and charged over a disturbance while he was distributing extremist Islamic pamphlets, but was nonetheless allowed to travel to Pakistan months before the failed attacks.



          Top World News  
          Today's Top News  
          Most Commented/Read Stories in 48 Hours
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 办公室强奷漂亮少妇视频| 97人妻精品一区二区三区| 国产第一页浮力影院入口| 日韩欧美卡一卡二卡新区| 国产精品一区二区三区蜜臀| 成人精品视频一区二区三区 | 欧美激烈精交gif动态图| 午夜精品极品粉嫩国产尤物| 亚洲国产精品高清久久久| 99精品人妻少妇一区| 免费人成视频在线视频电影| 亚洲一区日韩高清中文字幕亚洲| 亚洲国产欧美一区二区好看电影| 黑森林av导航| 亚洲av无码之国产精品网址蜜芽| 漂亮人妻被中出中文字幕久久 | 在线观看无码av五月花| 欧美熟妇xxxxx欧美老妇不卡| 国产欧美日韩视频怡春院| 国产午夜在线观看视频| 免费无码观看的AV在线播放| 熟妇人妻无乱码中文字幕真矢织江 | 久久婷婷国产精品香蕉| 亚洲AV无码乱码在线观看性色扶| 欧美亚洲日本国产综合在线美利坚 | 欧美老少配性行为| 亚洲日韩VA无码中文字幕| 亚洲伊人久久综合成人| 狠狠色狠狠色综合久久蜜芽| 国产精品无码av天天爽播放器 | 在线天堂中文新版www| 天堂资源在线| 精品午夜福利短视频一区| 国产360激情盗摄全集| 影音先锋AV成人资源站在线播放 | 九九热在线精品视频免费| 亚洲乱码日产精品m| 国产午夜精品久久一二区| 真人免费一级毛片一区二区| 亚洲国产精品成人综合久| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃 |