<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-10 08:34

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          Milan Bacevic, Serbian ambassador to China, experiences TCM diagnosis at "TCM Health Day For Ambassadors" in Beijing, Dec 12, 2016. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

          A diplomat, as once defined by US writer Caskie Stinnett, "is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip". Stinnett was writing in the mid-20th century, when exchanges between governments still relied on cadres of professionals based in each other's capitals and communicating with home via telegram, or dispatches hand-carried by couriers and consigned to diplomatic bags.

          His definition of the diplomat's role encapsulates its essential requirements-sycophancy and duplicity.

          These days, world leaders can communicate instantly with both their constituents and each other with no more effort-and frequently no more thought-than it takes to type 140 characters on their Twitter feed.

          US President Donald Trump is a master of the new art and appears to follow a rule adopted from his business career that, even in diplomacy, you should aim to cut out the middleman. But the problem with instant messaging is that it offers speed at the cost of reflection, and brevity at the cost of precision. It also dispenses with that essential diplomatic tool-procrastination.

          The diplomat of a previous era, called on to defuse some looming crisis engendered by an intemperate remark or gesture from one of his or her political masters, would invariably assure the host government that the embassy was "urgently seeking clarification". (Translation: "We're going to delay and obfuscate until you've forgotten all about it.")

          These days, by contrast, social media gives political leaders a virtual "hot line" to abuse each other directly and very publicly without recourse to diplomatic intermediaries. Many may welcome the more direct approach spearheaded by Trump as a breath of fresh air. Like a man who has fired the White House chauffeur and grabbed the steering wheel himself, Trump careers along the information superhighway, shoving aside enemies both foreign and domestic. It must be invigorating, as long as you don't crash.

          You might also argue that the direct approach to diplomacy is more honest.

          In the past, the blazing confrontation between the United States and Germany over the future of the Western alliance would have been described in diplomat-speak as "full and frank exchanges". With social media at his disposal, Trump can cut through the hypocrisy by tweeting: "We have a massive trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay far less than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for US. This will change".

          But despite the superficial attractions of this "tell it like it is" approach, there is still much to be said for old-style diplomacy. The niceties of diplomatic protocol can help to defuse tensions, rather than enflame them.

          In its guide Protocol for the Modern Diplomat, the US State Department cautions new recruits that the informal US approach does not always go down well with other cultures. According to the guide: "Tremendous differences exist in how close people stand to socialize, how loudly they speak, and how much eye contact they maintain." And, it might have added, don't push fellow heads of state aside to get to the front of the line.

          For all the stuffiness and insincerity of the diplomatic circuit, traditional diplomats probably do continue to play an essential role, even in an era of instant communications and presidential tweeting.

          Diplomats alone cannot prevent conflicts, as history shows. But a temperate diplomatic approach can help calm the waters. "A soft answer turns away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger", as it says in the Christian Bible.

          The essence of the profession is not, of course, to be gratuitously generous to the other side, but rather to gain advantage for one's own, if necessary by lying for one's country.

          In the words of the great Chinese strategist Sun Tzu: "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."

          The author is a senior media consultant for China Daily, Europe.

          editor@mail.chinadailyuk.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: av天堂精品久久久久| 国产精品人成视频免费国产| 26uuu另类亚洲欧美日本| 老鸭窝在线视频| 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站| 亚洲精品天堂在线观看| 日韩不卡免费视频| 人妻精品动漫H无码中字| 亚洲国产精品VA在线看黑人| 亚洲乱理伦片在线观看中字| 99视频九九精品视频在线观看| 国产91精品一区二区麻豆| 婷婷六月色| 亚洲码国产精品高潮在线| 在线 国产 欧美 专区| (原创)露脸自拍[62p]| 国产精品中文字幕免费| 成人无码区在线观看| 亚洲AVAV天堂AV在线网阿V| 少妇乳大丰满在线播放| 日韩精品中文字幕有码 | 欧美人与动牲交A免费观看| 日本免费人成视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合精品成人导航| 久久国产乱子精品免费女| 色伦专区97中文字幕| 麻豆蜜桃AV蜜臀AV色欲AV| 特级欧美AAAAAAA免费观看| A毛片毛片看免费| 国产360激情盗摄全集| 少妇精品视频一码二码三| 国产成人综合在线女婷五月99播放 | 中文无码熟妇人妻av在线| 丰满人妻熟妇乱又精品视| 亚洲精品麻豆一二三区| 国产一级特黄高清大片一| 熟妇的奶头又大又长奶水视频| 天堂资源在线| 亚洲高清国产拍精品熟女| 国产精品成| 国产精品乱码人妻一区二区三区|