<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語(yǔ)Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          By Harvey Morris | China Daily | Updated: 2017-06-10 08:34

          Niceties of old-style diplomacy still work

          Milan Bacevic, Serbian ambassador to China, experiences TCM diagnosis at "TCM Health Day For Ambassadors" in Beijing, Dec 12, 2016. [Zou Hong/China Daily]

          A diplomat, as once defined by US writer Caskie Stinnett, "is a person who can tell you to go to hell in such a way that you actually look forward to the trip". Stinnett was writing in the mid-20th century, when exchanges between governments still relied on cadres of professionals based in each other's capitals and communicating with home via telegram, or dispatches hand-carried by couriers and consigned to diplomatic bags.

          His definition of the diplomat's role encapsulates its essential requirements-sycophancy and duplicity.

          These days, world leaders can communicate instantly with both their constituents and each other with no more effort-and frequently no more thought-than it takes to type 140 characters on their Twitter feed.

          US President Donald Trump is a master of the new art and appears to follow a rule adopted from his business career that, even in diplomacy, you should aim to cut out the middleman. But the problem with instant messaging is that it offers speed at the cost of reflection, and brevity at the cost of precision. It also dispenses with that essential diplomatic tool-procrastination.

          The diplomat of a previous era, called on to defuse some looming crisis engendered by an intemperate remark or gesture from one of his or her political masters, would invariably assure the host government that the embassy was "urgently seeking clarification". (Translation: "We're going to delay and obfuscate until you've forgotten all about it.")

          These days, by contrast, social media gives political leaders a virtual "hot line" to abuse each other directly and very publicly without recourse to diplomatic intermediaries. Many may welcome the more direct approach spearheaded by Trump as a breath of fresh air. Like a man who has fired the White House chauffeur and grabbed the steering wheel himself, Trump careers along the information superhighway, shoving aside enemies both foreign and domestic. It must be invigorating, as long as you don't crash.

          You might also argue that the direct approach to diplomacy is more honest.

          In the past, the blazing confrontation between the United States and Germany over the future of the Western alliance would have been described in diplomat-speak as "full and frank exchanges". With social media at his disposal, Trump can cut through the hypocrisy by tweeting: "We have a massive trade deficit with Germany, plus they pay far less than they should on NATO & military. Very bad for US. This will change".

          But despite the superficial attractions of this "tell it like it is" approach, there is still much to be said for old-style diplomacy. The niceties of diplomatic protocol can help to defuse tensions, rather than enflame them.

          In its guide Protocol for the Modern Diplomat, the US State Department cautions new recruits that the informal US approach does not always go down well with other cultures. According to the guide: "Tremendous differences exist in how close people stand to socialize, how loudly they speak, and how much eye contact they maintain." And, it might have added, don't push fellow heads of state aside to get to the front of the line.

          For all the stuffiness and insincerity of the diplomatic circuit, traditional diplomats probably do continue to play an essential role, even in an era of instant communications and presidential tweeting.

          Diplomats alone cannot prevent conflicts, as history shows. But a temperate diplomatic approach can help calm the waters. "A soft answer turns away wrath; but grievous words stir up anger", as it says in the Christian Bible.

          The essence of the profession is not, of course, to be gratuitously generous to the other side, but rather to gain advantage for one's own, if necessary by lying for one's country.

          In the words of the great Chinese strategist Sun Tzu: "The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting."

          The author is a senior media consultant for China Daily, Europe.

          editor@mail.chinadailyuk.com

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美另类精品久久久 | 色欲综合久久中文字幕网| 成人一区二区不卡国产| 国产亚洲精品久久久999蜜臀| 国产一区二区午夜福利久久| 国产成人午夜在线视频极速观看| 丝袜国产一区av在线观看| 国产精品久久福利新婚之夜| 国产精品人人妻人人爽| 国产一区二区波多野结衣| 大JI巴好深好爽又大又粗视频| 色综合天天综合网天天看片| 国产精品久久久一区二区三区 | 国产极品美女高潮无套| 亚洲国产日韩精品久久| 99久热这里精品免费观看| 亚洲欧美人成网站在线观看看| 最大色网男人的av天堂| 免费无码肉片在线观看| 无码专区aaaaaa免费视频| 国产亚洲AV电影院之毛片| 久久99精品久久水蜜桃| 国产一区二区黄色在线观看| 日本中文字幕乱码免费| 国产乱码日产乱码精品精| 亚洲天堂伊人久久a成人| 亚洲欧美色综合影院| 国产老女人精品免费视频| 人妻系列无码专区无码中出| 最近中文字幕mv免费视频| 野花韩国高清电影| 中文字幕在线亚洲精品| yy6080免费毛片一级| 国产成人久久精品流白浆| 18禁超污无遮挡无码网址| 亚洲情A成黄在线观看动漫尤物| 青青青草国产熟女大香蕉| 国产精品剧情亚洲二区| 欧美国产综合视频| 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 色妞色视频一区二区三区四区|