<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          More educational resources needed for less developed regions

          By Wang Yiqing (China Daily) Updated: 2016-05-26 07:33

          More educational resources needed for less developed regions

          A student goes through a metal detector in Lianyungang, Jiangsu province. [Photo/IC]

          As this year's gaokao, or national college entrance examination, approaches, the adjustments to the college enrollment policy in some regions have caused public concern.

          With some developed provinces and municipalities offering some of their existing quota of college places to students from the less-developed central and western regions, parents and students fear they will lose out as a result of the adjustments, and complain that it's unfair for their children to give way to students whose scores in the exam might be lower.

          Despite the education authorities' repeated promises that the original local recruitment quotas will not shrink, there have been growing calls in some populous provinces for unified exam papers and college recruitment policies nationwide, meaning all colleges should enroll students according to the same admission score no matter where the candidates are from. Currently different regions at the provincial level set their own exam papers and college recruitment quotas.

          Striving for fairness is reasonable and necessary in any society, but the question is how to achieve that goal in real life. This "absolutely fair" method believes exam scores can guarantee fairness and help select the best students under a unified standard, but it ignores the students' different situations and fails to realize the negative effects it may have.

          The strong resistance of students and parents to any adjustments in college enrollment policies is understandable as they may impact an individual's entire life. In any society education is the most accessible channel to achieve social mobility. And even though a college degree cannot guarantee a brilliant future as it used to, a higher education is still a necessity in the pursuit of "a better life" for most people in China. Especially for poorer families, it may be the only way children can change their fate.

          With the gap between the rich and the poor in the country growing ever wider, educational fairness is a highly sensitive issue.

          Compared with students from rich families and the more developed regions, students from poor families and the less developed regions are in a disadvantaged position in front of the same examination paper. If all the colleges admit students according to the same admission score, it is imaginable that they will enroll more students from well-off families and the developed regions, as these families can afford to pay more for their children's education. In addition, if the admission score becomes the only criterion for college enrollment, basic education will be more exam-oriented, and the best educational resources will be further concentrated in the developed regions. This would not only reduce the chance for students from undeveloped regions and poor families to have higher education, but would also undermine the cultivation of the country's best talents.

          As college enrollment is a competition for limited educational resources, there seems no win-win result that can satisfy everyone.

          But the real question is: What do we really talk about when we talk about fairness?

          And the answer to that is we're talking about interests.

          China's college enrollment dilemma is the same as the hukou (household registration) problem. Because of limited resources and the actual situations in different areas, people in an inferior position have less access to resources, and those in more advantageous positions are reluctant to give them more access, fearing they will lose some of the advantages they enjoy.

          Instead of debating the "legitimacy" of this situation, people should realize that limited and unbalanced educational resources among different regions are the root of the problem.

          To promote relative fairness, the education authorities are providing favorable college enrollment policies to candidates from the central and western regions. But this should only be a short-term measure, in the long run, what is needed is more educational resources for the less developed regions, as this is what will really benefit students there.

          The author is a writer with China Daily. wangyiqing@chinadaily.com.cn

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久抢| 亚洲精品成人久久久| 57pao国产成视频免费播放| 久久大香萑太香蕉av黄软件| 51午夜精品免费视频| 久久频这里精品99香蕉久网址| 国产日韩av二区三区| 亚洲av无码成人网站www| 久视频久免费视频久免费| 18禁黄无遮挡网站免费| 亚洲精品久荜中文字幕| 欧美成人精品手机在线| 精品亚洲精品日韩精品| 久章草在线毛片视频播放| 亚洲人交乣女bbw| 国产午夜影视大全免费观看| 国产情侣激情在线对白| 99国产午夜福利在线观看| 97人妻免费碰视频碰免| 西西444www高清大胆| 国产成人欧美日韩在线电影| 欧美人牲交a欧美精区日韩| 中国熟妇毛多多裸交视频| 少妇夜夜春夜夜爽试看视频| 内射无套内射国产精品视频| 亚洲欧美在线综合一区二区三区| 色综合天天综合| 欧美不卡无线在线一二三区观| 亚洲中文色欧另类欧美| 国产亚洲亚洲国产一二区| 樱花草在线播放免费高清观看| 色国产视频| 国内精品视频一区二区三区八戒| 狠狠综合av一区二区| 综合偷自拍亚洲乱中文字幕| 中文字幕无码日韩专区免费| 国产av黄色一区二区三区| 日韩伦人妻无码| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区在线| 久久亚洲色WWW成人男男| 国产高清精品自在线看|