<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Chris Peterson

          A for entertainment, F for accuracy

          By Chris Peterson (China Daily Europe) Updated: 2015-09-09 16:38

          A for entertainment, F for accuracy

          The screenshot shows students's bad behavior at class in the BBC documentary,Are Our Kids Tough Enough? Chinese School.

          BBC documentary series on China-UK education project is fun but flawed

          It ran for three weeks, and triggered an avalanche of comments both in China and the UK. Debate rages about the merits of British education versus the Chinese system. Most of my friends and colleagues have watched it, and I have been glued to the screen.

          The series, Are Our Kids Tough Enough? Chinese School, has been described by critics and viewers variously as car-crash television, reality TV gone mad, an insult to both Chinese and UK teachers, and a superficial attempt to tackle an interesting question.

          Me, I tend toward the car-crash television theory - you watch because you are waiting for the next bit of high drama.

          One thing that did surprise me was that the three-part series was made in conjunction with Britain's Open University, which provides distance learning and off-campus study for tens of thousands of people in Britain, either those in work, or those who missed out on a traditional bricks and mortar educational career path. In other words, a serious educational establishment.

          I should confess here and declare an interest - I am studying for a BA honours degree in History at the OU. But that's given me access to the members-only online debate that's been set off by this series.

          And what a debate - over 30 pages of comments, averaging at least 10 comments per page, from OU students past and present, of all ages and from all backgrounds. I don't think I've seen such a reaction to a subject since I started my studies two years ago.

          There are common themes running through the debate thread - outrage at the behavior of the students, harsh criticism for the apparent aloofness and remote attitudes of the Bohunt School staff members, disbelief at the disruptiveness of some students, disagreement over the accuracy of the Chinese and British systems as portrayed, and sympathy for the five Chinese teachers involved in the month-long project.

          Sample comments:

          "I watched with dismay this tosh (rubbish) on television."

          "A dreadful, smug head."

          "Uninspiring Chinese teachers."

          "Merely lame 'edutainment' - the cameraman zoomed in on the pretty girls in the class."

          "It does look as if the Chinese teachers were set up to fail, and reinforce the prejudices of the rather smug English teachers that our system is better."

          "Chinese school students need more creativity and vitality, and British students need more perseverance and responsibility."

          "I am appalled by this documentary. It is utterly unfair to put Chinese teachers into a British school to teach Year 9s."

          "In Britain we seem to have turned education into a form of entertainment, a game that everybody wins."

          "The Chinese teachers must have known to some extent what they were letting themselves in for."

          "Students I teach from China can also be lazy and disrespectful, but express it in different ways - evasiveness, plagiarism and being uncooperative in class."

          And the comments go on, and on, with a fair number of Chinese contributors as well as Britons.

          From my perspective, I feel it is wholly wrong to portray this as a serious experiment - it only lasted for a month, and there was no attempt to mention any caveats.

          We learn from the Chinese-language media that only two of the teachers were straight from the education system in China - the rest, it is said, have been living and teaching in the UK for several years. I can't vouch for the accuracy of that.

          If you looked closely, the various students who were misbehaving and disruptive were all wearing discreet microphones clipped onto their polo shirts - the others did not. That raises strong doubts in my mind about the spontaneity of the scenes in class.

          My wife, herself a product of a French education in her native Vietnam, came up with the word that summed up a lot of what the program was purporting to say. That word is "disconnect".

          Disconnect in as much as it was clear the students, Chinese teachers and English teachers, as well as parents, had little or no understanding of what was happening.

          If you take two totally separate societies and cultures and compare the two, of course there will be differences.

          Point a camera at most teenagers, and they will for the most part act up.

          I have been through a traditional English education, my daughters have done the same, and I am watching my two grandchildren navigate their way through the vagaries of the English primary system. Plus, my eldest daughter is a teacher, and she has never witnessed any scenes such as those depicted in these programs.

          I work with Chinese colleagues here in London, and all are adamant that China's system is changing, and has been for the past decade.

          Pause here for a smug, I-told-you-so moment. After the second episode aired, I firmly predicted to colleagues in the office that there would be a happy, Disney-like ending.

          There was. The badly-behaved members of the class miraculously got their acts together, the Chinese teachers relaxed slightly, and in the final test between the English system and the Chinese method, China edged it. Self-conscious high-fives all round, with pupils admitting they had enjoyed it after all.

          You couldn't have made it up. Well, if you were producing a three-part television series you could.

          And here's a final thought - if the British education system is so lacking, why do thousands of Chinese students come here to sample its sixth-form colleges and universities?

          I have the overwhelming feeling that what the producers were looking for was sensational tabloid-style television. Fine, but please don't present it as a serious study.

          A bit like comparing chalk and cheese, really.

          The author is managing editor of Europe for China Daily.

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          Poll shows need for Sino-US big picture
          Conflicting theories on car crash no surprise
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕av日韩有码| 人成午夜免费大片| 国产精品久久这里只有精品| 四虎成人精品在永久免费| 亚洲区1区3区4区中文字幕码| 国产强奷在线播放免费| 亚洲国产成人无码AV在线影院L| 亚洲av成人一区二区三区| 日韩a∨精品日韩在线观看| 91精品一区二区蜜桃| 国产一区二区精品高清在线观看| 中文字幕99国产精品| 另类国产ts人妖合集| 99久久精品国产一区二区| 亚洲青青草视频在线播放| 久久波多野结衣av| 成人无码潮喷在线观看| 天天爽天天爽天天爽| 在线播放深夜精品三级| 人人妻人人揉人人模人人模| 国产午夜精品一区二区三| 久久久成人毛片无码| 亚洲成av人影院无码不卡| 免费无码又爽又刺激高潮虎虎视频 | 成年女人片免费视频播放A| 亚洲熟妇夜夜一区二区三区| 精品一区二区中文字幕| 国产真人做爰免费视频| 亚洲大尺度视频在线播放| 久久永久免费人妻精品下载| 亚洲综合一区二区三区视频 | 日韩大片高清播放器| 人妻教师痴汉电车波多野结衣| 久久69国产精品久久69软件| 国产成人精选在线观看不卡| 成人福利国产午夜AV免费不卡在线| 超碰成人人人做人人爽| 国产一国产一级毛片aaa| 成人亚欧欧美激情在线观看| 年轻女教师hd中字| 国产午夜精品福利91|