<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          No absolute freedom of speech

          By Ku Ma (China Daily) Updated: 2013-10-29 07:18

          It's a big pity that the Western media rushed to join in the debate sparked by Chen Yongzhou, a Chinese tabloid journalist who was detained on charges of defaming a construction equipment maker, while only a few of them paid much attention to Jimmy Kimmel's "kill every one in China" comment, which should surely have been even more eye catching.

          No absolute freedom of speech

          Talk show host Jimmy Kimmel. [Photo / Xinhua]

          Chen has been portrayed by many Western media outlets as the latest "victim" in China's "new curbs on journalists, lawyers and Internet users". ABC talk show host Kimmel praised a boy's idea to deal with US debt crisis by "killing every one in China" as "interesting", which outraged Chinese people, but did not provoke much criticism from his fellow journalists.

          These two unrelated incidents raise a common question: speech freedom is a shared value, but what are the boundaries of this freedom?

          Freedom of speech should certainly be protected, however, there is no, and can be no, "absolute speech freedom", no matter whether it is in China or in the West.

          The tabloid reporter Chen's case is still under investigation. Over the weekend, Chen confessed on State broadcaster Central China Television that he received bribes to invent negative stories about Changsha-based Zoomlion Heavy Industry Science and Technology Co. Ltd. New Express, the Guangzhou tabloid that employed Chen, had published two bold front-page pleas for police to release him last week. But on Sunday it issued an apology for the false reports.

          CCTV's reports sparked controversy because its images of Chen in handcuffs may lead the public to believe he is a criminal. But before his confession many netizens had supported Chen, insisting he was wronged by Hunan police.

          The media should not intervene in justice. Chen should not be considered a criminal before he has been convicted in court, neither should he be portrayed as a victim before then. CCTV's reports, despite being controversial, were a sort of media rebalancing after the majority of online opinion favored Chen against the police.

          It' s a basic journalism principle that journalists should base their reports on the facts they discover rather than invent stories, and they should of course not take bribes. If the charges against Chen prove true, the case will be judged and he will be sentenced according to the law.

          Previous Page 1 2 Next Page

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          New type of urbanization is in the details
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 人人做人人妻人人精| 成人av一区二区三区| 精品一区二区不卡免费| 人妻在线中文字幕| 亚洲 成人 无码 在线观看| 东北女人毛多水多牲交视频| 日本系列亚洲系列精品| 亚洲精品二区在线播放| 欧美精品视频一区二区三区| 久久国内精品自在自线91| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 少妇人妻偷人精品免费| 自拍视频在线观看三级| 亚洲精品中文字幕无乱码| 少妇办公室好紧好爽再浪一点| 国产另类ts人妖一区二区| 国产一区二区不卡视频在线| 精品国产成人a在线观看| 大尺度国产一区二区视频| 亚洲精品国产av一区二区| 欧美福利在线| 国产真实伦在线观看视频| 国产高清无遮挡内容丰富| 婷婷久久综合九色综合88| 天堂√在线中文官网在线| 色悠悠国产精品免费观看| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久| 夜夜嗨久久人成在日日夜夜| 久久这里都是精品二| 国产精品国产亚洲区久久| 国产欧美在线观看一区| 国产亚洲999精品AA片在线爽| 色综合天天综合网天天看片| 永久免费无码av在线网站| 亚洲乱码中文字幕小综合| 无码国产精品免费看| 人妻少妇偷人无码视频| 国产在线午夜不卡精品影院| 亚洲欧洲精品日韩av| www.狠狠| 日韩av日韩av在线|