<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          What lies behind the new international financial crisis?

          Updated: 2011-08-09 17:49

          By John Ross (chinadaily.com.cn)

            Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

          Ideologically, right wing forces - the US Tea Party and forces in Europe sharing the views of the British Conservatives - advocate limiting the public debt build up by radically reducing government spending. This is linked to a theory that the state is ‘crowding out’ the private sector. The recession’s main cause is the fall in private investment and this theory argues that resources used to finance the budget deficit would be used to generate an economic expansion if released to the private sector – for example US financial analyst John Mauldin argues "increasing government debt crowds out the necessary savings for private investment."

          But reducing budget deficits by cutting public spending can't create an economic way out in present conditions. Reducing budget deficits cuts demand. But resources released to the private sector are used to pay down debt, so private spending will not increase sufficiently to compensate for the fall in public spending. Total demand will fall, increasing recessionary pressure.

          However, other than in the short term, increasing the deficit doesn't work either - and large budget deficits are financially unsustainable in the medium term.

          Running large budget deficits is often inaccurately described as a 'Keynesian' policy - inaccurately as Keynes own central concern was factors affecting investment and not budget deficits. For example US economist Paul Davidson claims in The Keynes Solution: "Anything that increases spending on goods and services increases the profitability of business firms and the hiring of workers." But this is false - for example, an increase in spending on goods and services accompanied by cost increases may lead profits to fall.

          However, even if profit did increase, companies may not reverse the cuts in investment that are the core of the recession. Keynes pointed out that to generate investment a price must be paid to overcome "liquidity preference" - the advantages of holding assets in cash and other liquid forms. In present circumstances of high uncertainty, the cost of overcoming liquidity preference may be prohibitive.

          Still more fundamentally, given excessive indebtedness, companies use resources to repay debt and not to invest even if demand increases. Therefore stimulating demand by budget deficits may prevent worse collapses in production but doesn’t produce significant output increases.

          Low interest rates are also insufficient to provide a way out. These are necessary to prevent interest payments becoming unsupportable. But they do not lead to investment when companies are intent on paying down debt and have no intention of borrowing for investment.

          There is a way out. It was used by China in its 2008 stimulus package and Keynes himself advised it. The state must overcome the threat or reality of a fall in investment by organizing investment itself. As Keynes noted: "It seems unlikely that the influence of banking policy on the rate of interest will be sufficient by itself to determine an optimum rate of investment. I conceive, therefore, that a somewhat comprehensive socialization of investment will prove the only means of securing an approximation to full employment."

          In the US and Europe the obstacles to Keynes', or China's, solutions lie in economic structure. After its 1978 economic reforms China no longer administers its economy, but it has a sufficiently large state sector to deliver investment programs. But in the US and Europe Keynes "somewhat comprehensive socialization of investment" does not exist and therefore, unlike China, they cannot deliver an investment-led stimulus.

          The economic perspectives flowing from the new financial crisis are therefore clear. The US and Europe at best face several years of very slow growth. China’s economy will continue to rapidly expand.

          John Ross is Visiting Professor at Antai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University. From 2000 to 2008, he was then London Mayor Ken Livingstone's Policy Director of Economic and Business Policy. The views expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the China Daily website.

             Previous Page 1 2 Next Page  

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本另类αv欧美另类aⅴ| 夜夜躁日日躁狠狠久久av| 丰满少妇69激情啪啪无| 婷婷四房播播| 高清国产亚洲精品自在久久| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 亚洲AV日韩AV激情亚洲| 精品日韩人妻中文字幕| 无码人妻视频一区二区三区| 国产精品美女一区二三区| 国产18禁一区二区三区| 色综合天天综合网国产人| 少妇特黄a一区二区三区| 亚洲AV日韩精品久久久久| 国产av一区二区不卡| 久久精品夜色噜噜亚洲aa| 韩国精品一区二区三区在线观看| 日韩亚洲精品中文字幕| 色婷婷综合视频在线观看视频一区| 久久人与动人物a级毛片| 一个人看的www在线视频| 日韩精品一区二区三区激情视频| 亚洲AV成人片不卡无码| 人妻大胸奶水2| 国产一区二区一卡二卡| 美女啪啪网站又黄又免费| 国产粉嫩区一区二区三区| free性开放小少妇| 久久精品国产亚洲αv忘忧草| 52熟女露脸国语对白视频| 中国明星xxxx性裸交| 国产99视频精品免费专区| 91人妻熟妇在线视频| 国产精品亚洲av三区色| 搡老熟女老女人一区二区| 久热这里有精品视频播放| 精品无码久久久久久久久久| 国产二区三区不卡免费| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠喷水| 天堂v亚洲国产v第一次| 爱情岛亚洲论坛成人网站|