<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Public increases tax pressure on govt

          By Wu Yixue (China Daily) Updated: 2011-05-20 08:01

          The public has expressed a high degree of concern since a draft amendment to the Personal Income Tax Law was submitted to the National People's Congress.

          The amendment proposes the tax threshold be raised to 3,000 yuan a month ($460) from the current 2,000 yuan and the current nine brackets of the rating system be reduced to seven. On the first day of publication, the top legislature received more than 100,000 responses and had collected nearly 200,000 by May 8, which is the total number of responses it received for all the 20 law drafts made public since 2009.

          Related readings:
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Some suggestions for tax reform
          Public increases tax pressure on govt No consensus in debate over income-tax threshold
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Experts input on tax threshold changes
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Current tax rate is too high, Chinese say

          Many have complained that the tax threshold's 1,000-yuan rise is not enough and there are those who have been critical of the whole tax system. Some urban dwellers, especially those in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other large cities, published their living costs online on a variety of websites and forums, and these were much higher than the minimum living expenses calculated by relevant government departments.

          The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) recently offered some confusing statistics on the country's per capita housing expenses, an important part of people's living costs, and that has further undermined the NBS's long-controversial credibility and also increased people's doubts about how reasonable a tax threshold of 3,000 yuan is.

          Hua Sheng, a Beijing-based economist, is staunchly opposed to government moves to raise the minimum tax threshold by a large margin, citing this does no good to low-income earners, especially those with a monthly income below 2,000 yuan. He argues that the government should prioritize raising the incomes of this group rather than reducing taxes for higher-income people.

          Such a viewpoint has no solid foundation because it ignores the fact that any government moves to raise the incomes of low-income people do not contradict its efforts to reduce tax for middle-income residents. It is by no means an "either this or that" choice.

          However, to further raise the minimum tax threshold to 5,000 yuan or more, as some netizens have suggested, would cause a large loss of government fiscal revenue. Even increasing the tax threshold to 3,000 yuan will directly result in a decline of 90 billion yuan in government revenues, according to estimates by the taxation authorities.

          But the Chinese government is financially powerful enough to take steps toward reducing income tax. The central fiscal revenues have maintained a 20-30 percent growth year-on-year in recent years, much faster than the growth of people's per capita incomes. Reducing people's tax burdens appears particularly important and urgent when domestic demand has long remained too weak to drive national economic growth.

          In its 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015), the government is in a very good position to maintain a considerable growth in people's incomes and boost domestic demand. Together with the high CPI, these are enough to raise people's expectations of further tax relief.

          In an online chat on the Xinhuanet.com with netizens in February, Premier Wen Jiabao promised to raise the minimum threshold of personal income tax this year when responding to a taxi driver's complaint that the current 2,000-yuan tax threshold is too low.

          In fact, it is not a difficult decision if the government has hammered home the knowledge that its fiscal revenues are meant to serve the people and improve their livelihoods and welfare, rather than to pursue a growth in the State coffers. Public money should be used for the public. Reducing tax serves as the most direct way to achieve this.

          Public opinions on the disclosed draft to the Personal Income Tax Law continue to pour into the NPC. They are a crucial means for it to interact with the public and should be taken into consideration by the country's supreme power organ on the issue of tax reductions.

          The author is a writer with China Daily.

          (China Daily 05/20/2011 page8)

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          New type of urbanization is in the details
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品偷伦费观看一次 | 日韩丝袜亚洲国产欧美一区| 精品国产成人a在线观看| 丁香五月婷激情综合第九色| 亚洲AV无码不卡一区二区三区| 国产午夜三级一区二区三| 国产精品亚洲五月天高清| 国产无遮挡性视频免费看| 鲁丝一区鲁丝二区鲁丝三区| 国产尤物AV尤物在线看| 成人免费A级毛片无码片2022| 亚洲中文精品人人永久免费| 97欧美精品系列一区二区| 综合午夜福利中文字幕人妻 | 久久综合噜噜激激的五月天| 激情五月开心综合亚洲| 日本人又色又爽的视频| 精品国产一区二区三区av性色| 国产精品尤物在线| 精品国产亚洲午夜精品a| 国产成人精品无码片区在线观看| 国产精品老熟女乱一区二区| 久久亚洲av成人无码软件| 五月丁香激激情亚洲综合| 看全黄大色黄大片视频| 亚洲成a人片在线观看中| 国产亚洲av人片在线播放| 成人午夜电影福利免费| 少妇厨房愉情理9仑片视频| 国产女人水多毛片18| 国产午夜福利视频合集| 国产精品久久中文字幕第一页 | 无码人妻一区二区三区精品视频| 日韩激情成人| 真实单亲乱l仑对白视频| 国产偷国产偷亚洲清高| av无码精品一区二区乱子| 国产一精品一av一免费| 2021国产精品一区二区在线| 99RE6在线视频精品免费下载| 国产91视频免费观看|