<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Public increases tax pressure on govt

          By Wu Yixue (China Daily) Updated: 2011-05-20 08:01

          The public has expressed a high degree of concern since a draft amendment to the Personal Income Tax Law was submitted to the National People's Congress.

          The amendment proposes the tax threshold be raised to 3,000 yuan a month ($460) from the current 2,000 yuan and the current nine brackets of the rating system be reduced to seven. On the first day of publication, the top legislature received more than 100,000 responses and had collected nearly 200,000 by May 8, which is the total number of responses it received for all the 20 law drafts made public since 2009.

          Related readings:
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Some suggestions for tax reform
          Public increases tax pressure on govt No consensus in debate over income-tax threshold
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Experts input on tax threshold changes
          Public increases tax pressure on govt Current tax rate is too high, Chinese say

          Many have complained that the tax threshold's 1,000-yuan rise is not enough and there are those who have been critical of the whole tax system. Some urban dwellers, especially those in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other large cities, published their living costs online on a variety of websites and forums, and these were much higher than the minimum living expenses calculated by relevant government departments.

          The National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) recently offered some confusing statistics on the country's per capita housing expenses, an important part of people's living costs, and that has further undermined the NBS's long-controversial credibility and also increased people's doubts about how reasonable a tax threshold of 3,000 yuan is.

          Hua Sheng, a Beijing-based economist, is staunchly opposed to government moves to raise the minimum tax threshold by a large margin, citing this does no good to low-income earners, especially those with a monthly income below 2,000 yuan. He argues that the government should prioritize raising the incomes of this group rather than reducing taxes for higher-income people.

          Such a viewpoint has no solid foundation because it ignores the fact that any government moves to raise the incomes of low-income people do not contradict its efforts to reduce tax for middle-income residents. It is by no means an "either this or that" choice.

          However, to further raise the minimum tax threshold to 5,000 yuan or more, as some netizens have suggested, would cause a large loss of government fiscal revenue. Even increasing the tax threshold to 3,000 yuan will directly result in a decline of 90 billion yuan in government revenues, according to estimates by the taxation authorities.

          But the Chinese government is financially powerful enough to take steps toward reducing income tax. The central fiscal revenues have maintained a 20-30 percent growth year-on-year in recent years, much faster than the growth of people's per capita incomes. Reducing people's tax burdens appears particularly important and urgent when domestic demand has long remained too weak to drive national economic growth.

          In its 12th Five-Year Plan (2011-2015), the government is in a very good position to maintain a considerable growth in people's incomes and boost domestic demand. Together with the high CPI, these are enough to raise people's expectations of further tax relief.

          In an online chat on the Xinhuanet.com with netizens in February, Premier Wen Jiabao promised to raise the minimum threshold of personal income tax this year when responding to a taxi driver's complaint that the current 2,000-yuan tax threshold is too low.

          In fact, it is not a difficult decision if the government has hammered home the knowledge that its fiscal revenues are meant to serve the people and improve their livelihoods and welfare, rather than to pursue a growth in the State coffers. Public money should be used for the public. Reducing tax serves as the most direct way to achieve this.

          Public opinions on the disclosed draft to the Personal Income Tax Law continue to pour into the NPC. They are a crucial means for it to interact with the public and should be taken into consideration by the country's supreme power organ on the issue of tax reductions.

          The author is a writer with China Daily.

          (China Daily 05/20/2011 page8)

          Most Viewed Today's Top News
          New type of urbanization is in the details
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产va免费精品观看精品| 精品一区二区三区在线播放视频 | 日韩激情一区二区三区| 成人亚洲欧美一区二区三区| 又黄又刺激又黄又舒服| 搡老熟女老女人一区二区| 亚洲欧美综合中文| 波多野结衣中文字幕久久| 国产成AV人片久青草影院 | 少妇被日自拍黄色三级网络| 一个色综合亚洲热色综合| 久久精品亚洲国产成人av| 麻豆一区二区三区香蕉视频 | 真实国产老熟女无套内射| 宅男噜噜噜66在线观看| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 国产99青青成人A在线| 国产精品自在拍首页视频8| 亚洲午夜无码AV不卡| 国产一级二级三级毛片| 中文字幕日韩人妻高清在线| 久久www视频| 欧美性大战久久久久XXX| 日本丰满熟妇在线观看| 欧美黑人巨大xxxxx| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区高清视频 | 国内精品大秀视频日韩精品| 一区二区三区精品偷拍| 日韩成人一区二区三区在线观看| 国产精品国产主播在线观看| 国产精品综合av一区二区国产馆| 人成午夜大片免费视频77777| 精品国产中文字幕在线| 天堂视频一区二区免费在线观看| 日本3d黄动漫的在线观看| 91精品乱码一区二区三区| 国产福利微视频一区二区| 伊人久久大香线蕉AV网| 激情综合色区网激情五月| 成人亚洲一区二区三区在线| 各种少妇wbb撒尿|