<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Op-Ed Contributors

          Passing the buck for pollution

          By Zhang Monan (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-04-11 08:03
          Large Medium Small

          Developed countries should shoulder their own responsibilities instead of imposing a carbon tax on developing economies

          Developing countries should take active measures to head off the impact of developed countries' intensified attempts to shift the cost of their historical carbon emissions to developing countries.

          In a move designed to make developing nations pay the price for the treatment of their own carbon dioxide emissions, the Unites States, Japan and European nations have proposed a carbon tax on commodities coming into their territories.

          On Nov 19, 2008, the European Parliament and the European Commission adopted a bill, including international airlines into the EU Emissions Trading Scheme System (EU ETS) and announced that the bill would take effect on Jan 1, 2012. According to an estimate made by the International Air Transport Association, the European bill, if put in place, will result in an additional 2.4 billion-euro ($3.46 billion) cost for global airlines.

          Under the new system China would have to pay about 740 million yuan ($113 million).

          This carbon tax is a new form of economic hegemony. The costs and benefits brought by global carbon emissions have long been unevenly distributed between developed and developing nations.

          It is extremely unfair to use developed countries' carbon emission standards to measure the volumes of carbon emissions in developing nations and it ignores the large-volume of carbon emissions produced by the highly industrialized countries during their development.

          Statistics show that developed nations are responsible for 80 percent of global carbon emissions since 1950. After enjoying a high-polluting and high-energy consumption stage, developed countries are now in a cleaner and less-polluting post-industrialized stage. In comparison, emerging nations such as China, Russia and India are still in the early or middle stage of their industrialization and still rely on heavy industries for their economic growth.

          The formation of a global structure of labor division that favors developed nations has accelerated the transfer of global low-end industries, especially the high-polluting and high-emissions manufacturing sector, to developing nations and has enabled developed countries to shift some of their carbon emissions to developing countries. Statistics indicate that as a result of this shift, as much as 1.2 billion tons of carbon emissions are passed on to China every year, 20 percent of the its total volume of carbon emissions.

          By imposing carbon taxes on inflowing commodities, developed countries have their own ulterior motives. Because of their light industry-dominant industrial structure, developed countries have a lower carbon emission intensity than their developing counterparts.

          The carbon tax, which is in essence a new-type of trade barrier, will protect their own homegrown enterprises and raise the export costs for developing countries, compromising their competitiveness.

          A carbon tax, if adopted globally, would have a huge effect on China, a fast-growing economy that is fuelled by coal and oil consumption. Currently, China's energy consumption for every unit of its gross domestic product (GDP) is more than twice the world average. Therefore, a carbon tax would directly raise the costs for China's manufacturing sectors, reduce their profit margins and weaken their competitiveness in the international market.

          A survey conducted by the World Resources Institute (WRI) shows that China's exported commodities have the highest level of carbon emissions among world countries. That means that China's exports will bear the brunt of any carbon tax. A World Bank report indicates that the implementation of a carbon tax in the international market would mean an additional 26-percent on "made-in-China" goods and that exports would decline by 21 percent.

          To uphold their right to development China must work with other developing nations to ensure the accumulated carbon emission volumes, per capita GDP and per capita disposable incomes are the standards for the distribution of global carbon emission volumes. At the same time, developed countries should set up a compensation mechanism for carbon emission reductions in developing countries to protect the latter's fledging industries and their trade interests.

          China should also accelerate its long-overdue economic and industrial restructuring and develop low-carbon industries.

          The author is an economics researcher with the State Information Center.

          分享按鈕
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕日韩人妻一区| 国产精品视频一区二区亚瑟| 亚洲国产精品高清久久久 | 亚洲不卡一区二区在线看| 97精品国产福利一区二区三区| 久久精品伊人狠狠大香网| 久久水蜜桃亚洲av无码精品麻豆| 妖精视频yjsp毛片永久| 欧美国产日韩在线三区| 天天澡夜夜澡狠狠久久| 思思99热精品在线| 亚洲av一本二本三本| 高清无码爆乳潮喷在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久久天堂麻豆宅男| 欧美偷窥清纯综合图区| 免费福利视频一区二区三区高清| 国产成人高清亚洲综合| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久| 挺进朋友人妻雪白的身体韩国电影| 久久中文字幕无码一区二区| 欧美黑人大战白嫩在线| 自拍欧美亚洲| 蜜臀av一区二区三区日韩| 天堂mv在线mv免费mv香蕉| 久久久亚洲欧洲日产国码是av| 亚洲av午夜成人片| 国产乱子伦视频在线播放| 日本狂喷奶水在线播放212| 人妻人人做人做人人爱| 中文字幕永久免费观看| 久久亚洲精品情侣| 精品精品久久宅男的天堂| 免费a级黄毛片| 亚洲伦理一区二区| 成人3D动漫一区二区三区| 国产乱码精品一区二三区| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品久久电影欧美| 国产精品成人国产乱| 亚洲欧洲日韩精品在线| 国产精品无码专区在线观看不卡 |