<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Domestic Affairs

          Substandard surveys are worse than no surveys

          By Patrick Mattimore (chinadaily.com.cn)
          Updated: 2010-08-18 13:38
          Large Medium Small

          Newspapers increasingly rely upon surveys to inform readers. In addition to outsourcing survey work to professional organizations, newspapers should alert the public to some of the surveys' inherent limitations.

          Generally, surveys are representative samplings of larger populations of randomly selected individuals and have built in margins of error. A good survey will have a margin of error of 3% or less. That means that in 95 cases out of 100, if we were to conduct the same survey with different representative samples, the results would be within 3% (plus or minus) of our initial survey.

          While procedures for statistically collecting data are fairly well-established, a more serious potential source of inaccuracy in public opinion surveying is the content of the survey itself. Specifically, the wording of questions, the order in which they are asked, and the response alternatives that are made available to respondents can all influence the results of public opinion surveys.

          According to a Gallup paper on the topic, question wording is probably the greatest source of bias and error in the data, followed by question order. Writing a clear, unbiased question is an art and requires extensive knowledge about collecting information.

          There are some steps news sources can take to improve survey reporting.

          It is helpful if the news stories reporting results of surveys contain links to the survey questions so that interested individuals can evaluate and critique those questions and survey methodology. When possible, a newspaper should include specific questions asked in the survey as "China Daily" did with a survey about China and Japan published on Monday.

          Newspapers should invite experts' and laypersons' analyses of the data and, when appropriate, make those analyses available to the public.

          Surveys should disclose who conducted the polling and any outside funding received. Newspapers have a duty to alert the public as to possible biases of funders.

          Press releases about surveys should detail limits of the particular research and headlines should not oversell results. For example, if there has been a low response rate, the release might urge the public to interpret the results with greater caution.

          Surveys are tools that can reveal, inform, and shape public opinion. The utility of surveys depends largely upon the expertise of the pollsters and the degree to which the public trusts the sources reporting results of those surveys.

          About commentator: Patrick Mattimore is a fellow at the Institute for Analytic Journalism and an adjunct professor at Tsinghua/Temple Law School LLM Program in Beijing

             Previous Page 1 2 Next Page  

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人精品午夜在线观看| 国产成人不卡无码免费视频| 亚洲成A人一区二区三区| 精品国产免费一区二区三区香蕉| 亚洲女同在线播放一区二区| 亚洲中文精品久久久久久不卡 | 国产亚洲欧洲aⅴ综合一区| 亚洲一区二区三区自拍天堂| 久久久久亚洲av成人网址| 日韩伦人妻无码| 亚洲av免费成人在线| 欧美~日韩~国产~中文字幕| 亚洲av高清一区二区| 在线播放亚洲人成电影| 一本色道无码不卡在线观看| 亚洲精品无码久久一线| 国产av一区二区三区日韩| 国内免费视频成人精品| 国产福利社区一区二区| 久久精品99久久久久久久久| 久久99国产精品尤物| 日本另类αv欧美另类aⅴ| 国产香蕉九九久久精品免费| 亚洲理论电影在线观看| 国产成人精品自在钱拍| 中文字幕久久人妻熟人妻| 樱桃视频影院在线播放 | 日韩激情一区二区三区| 亚洲VA欧美VA国产综合| 极品尤物被啪到呻吟喷水| 无码一区二区波多野结衣播放搜索 | 高清国产av一区二区三区| 黑人巨大精品oideo| 日本国产精品第一页久久| 亚洲乱熟乱熟女一区二区| 国产亚洲精品VA片在线播放| 亚洲色欲色欱WWW在线| 色爱综合另类图片av| 乱女乱妇熟女熟妇综合网| AVtt手机版天堂网国产| 成人午夜视频在线|