<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Zhu Yuan

          Balance growth with social equity

          By Zhu Yuan (China Daily)
          Updated: 2010-06-02 07:15
          Large Medium Small

          Some Chinese miss the "good old days" when the wealth gap between the haves and have-nots was not as stark as it is now.

          Certainly, their lives are better today, yet they hate the social inequities brought on by the seemingly laissez faire policies of the past three decades.

          Some even say they would rather put up with the rationing of the past (prior to 1979) than witness the wallets of capitalists or speculators grow fatter, as wealth tilts in favor of the haves.

          They, of course, are pining for an economy that was tightly reined in by the government from the early 1950s to the late 1970s.

          However, they forget that the economy, to some extent, is just as controlled today as it was then.

          Ludwig von Mises, the Austrian economist whose masterpiece, Human Action, was translated into Chinese and published in January this year, may shed some light on this dilemma.

          His magnum opus, in German, was first published in 1940 and is still considered a classic on the market economy.

          As an economist who supported the theory of classic liberalism, Mises was undoubtedly a diehard advocate of laissez faire economy and fiercely opposed the concept of a planned one.

          I may not be the best judge of Mises' theories, but I do agree with his take on progress and reactionary forces.

          "Reaction against an unwise policy is not to be condemned. And, progress towards chaos is not to be commended. Nothing should find acceptance just because it is new, radical, and fashionable."

          This is quite similar to the "cat theory" propounded by late Chinese leader Deng Xiaoping: "It doesn't matter whether a cat is white or black, as long as it catches mice."

          So, on the question of a planned economy, what mattered at the time of the reform and "opening up" was whether the old model had facilitated economic development or not. The reform in 1978 was a reaction to the old policies, and it worked.

          Due to the miracle brought about by the economic reform and opening up policy over the past three decades, the ordinary Chinese citizen's quality of life has improved considerably.

          This has proved wrong the notion that the country's nearly 80 percent farmers were not able to feed a population of some 600 million in the 1960s and that its industry could hardly meet the people's need for daily necessities then.

          To be sure, relative social justice was maintained at the cost of economic development. Uncontrolled economic activity was disallowed for fear that higher incomes in the hands of certain individuals would hurt social justice. Yet, common poverty was the result.

          Now it seems the government has moved to the other extreme, which is that, everything must serve the need of economic growth.

          Deng Xiaoping did say, "economic development is of the utmost importance."

          Classic liberalism too strongly opposes government intervention in economic activity. However, no one has advocated economic growth at the expense of social justice.

          Besides, China's economy may hardly be called laissez faire. On the contrary, government policies are behind many an economic improvement project.

          Some policies promote economic development even at the cost of hurting the poor majority.

          Laissez faire without regulation by the government and necessary oversight can be problematic, as evidenced by the Wall Street-led financial crisis.

          This is because the pursuit of profit is fundamental to human nature, and it will undoubtedly be reckless without supervision and regulation.

          We call our economy a "socialist market economy" and our system, socialism with Chinese characteristics.

          We want to let the rest of the world know that we are different from traditional Western capitalist nations. There should be no problem with that.

          It actually does not matter what we call our economy or social system as long as we strike a balance between maintaining economic growth and safeguarding social justice.

          Mises once said that there was no way of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. It seems he had anticipated the current global financial crisis.

          My understanding is that it is just too dangerous for society to let a few people become richer even as the majority tumbles into extreme poverty. That is precisely the result of expansion of credit, and that is how social justice is given the go-by.

          Fortunately, the Chinese government has realized the potential danger of such a situation.

          Deng Xiaoping said, some people may be allowed to get rich first, but the final goal should be prosperity for all.

          This may just be the right moment to go about achieving the latter goal.

          E-mail: zhuyuan@chinadaily.com.cn

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩欧美不卡一卡二卡3卡四卡2021免费 | 亚洲中文字幕日产无码成人片| 天堂mv在线mv免费mv香蕉| 男人j进入女人j内部免费网站| 动漫AV纯肉无码AV电影网| 国产精品户外野外| 国产日韩欧美一区二区东京热| 日韩卡1卡2卡三卡免费网站| 国产成人精品无码一区二区| 国产mv在线天堂mv免费观看| 无码国产午夜福利片在线观看| 亚洲精品国产老熟女久久| 免费av毛片免费观看| 99精品国产在热久久婷婷| 国产成人精品第一区二区| 少妇特黄a一区二区三区| 麻豆精品在线| 秋霞人妻无码中文字幕| 国产乱老熟女乱老熟女视频| 国产精品一区二区人人爽| 亚洲嫩模喷白浆在线观看| 日韩精品亚洲专在线电影| 亚洲成av人片在www色猫咪| 国产成人精品无码一区二区老年人 | 日韩伦人妻无码| 麻豆蜜桃av蜜臀av色欲av| 99午夜精品亚洲一区二区| 色狠狠色婷婷丁香五月| 夜色福利站WWW国产在线视频 | 成人午夜视频在线| 91精品国产综合久久精品| 国产日韩欧美精品一区二区三区| 久久久久国产一级毛片高清版A | 久久丁香五月天综合网| 色综合久久综合久鬼色88| 亚洲另类激情专区小说图片| 日本国产一区二区三区在线观看| 人妻中文字幕在线视频无码| 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人精品97| 99久久精品免费看国产| 国产av区男人的天堂|