<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees
          By Wang Xin (China Daily)
          Updated: 2014-03-26

          To end a monopoly investigation against it in China, US wireless technology giant InterDigital Communications has pledged to license use of its patents in "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory terms", local media reports.

          IDC also pledged to withdraw intellectual property complaints with the US International Trade Commission against Chinese telecommunication makers Huawei Technology and ZTE, both headquartered in Shenzhen, Guangdong province.

          The anti-monopoly investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission started last June, Xu Kunlin, an official of the commission, said at a press conference in Beijing in February.

          The key issue is whether the US technological powerhouse has abused its dominant position in the market to charge higher prices in China, Xu said.

          Han Liang, a partner at the law firm Freshfields Brckhaus Deringer LLP, told the business news portal caijing.com.cn that the complex case combines anti-monopoly and intellectual property issues as well as competition and innovation.

          When doing business in telecommunications, companies cannot get around IDC, industry observers said.

          The conglomerate has an enormous patent portfolio of more than 19,500 technologies related to wireless communications, many of them crucial for the industry's technological standards.

          Its annual report shows that it makes its profit mainly from patent licensing rather than direct production.

          It has licensed some 40 wireless device manufacturers to use its patents, which are necessary to meet industry standards. Its clients include well-known cellphone brands Apple, Samsung and HTC.

          After many rounds of negotiations since late 2008, IDC and Huawei failed to reach an agreement on licensing fees.

          Huawei refused to accept IDC's proposal because it is 19 times the rate for Apple and more than twice that for Samsung, according to local media.

          IDC filed complaints against the Chinese company with the ITC and in a Delaware court in 2011, claiming Huawei infringed on seven of its patents.

          The trade commission announced a preliminary ruling in June, 2013 that said one of the patents is invalid and Huawei did not violate rights to the other six.

          Huawei filed an anti-monopoly complaint against IDC with a Shenzhen court at the end of 2011 and won the case.

          Judges found it legitimate for the case to be heard in China as Huawei is based in the country and "IDC's monopoly in the US and patent authorization could directly affect Huawei's production in China as well as its exports", the Xinhua news agency reported.

          The court found patent licensing rates offered by IDC to Huawei are much higher than for other companies, said Xinhua.

          The Guangdong provincial high court upheld the verdict by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court and ordered IDC to pay 20 million yuan ($3.26 million) in compensation for monopolistic practices.

          Wireless tech giant IDC pledges fair licensing fees

          The ruling was met with wide acclaim among domestic critics.

          "The purpose of intellectual property protection is to advance innovation and promote competition," said Wang Xiaoye, a researcher on law at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          "Rights owners should be punished in accordance with the anti-monopoly law in the case of abusive use of their IP rights resulting in exclusion, restriction and distortion of the market competition," she said.

          Yang Lixin, a law professor at Renmin University of China, said that the key to Huawei's court victory was that the company has developed the will and expertise to use the rules for protecting itself in international IP competition.

          Zhang Ping, a law professor at Peking University, said the landmark ruling gave a clear definition of the FRAND principle - fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory - which will have far-reaching influence in China and abroad.

          Yet William Perry, a partner at US law firm Dorsey American who worked with ITC before, expressed his concerns to Caijing business magazine.

          He said the Chinese government goes all out to encourage local innovation and has a strong desire to help homegrown high-tech companies rid themselves of reliance on overseas patents.

          The Ministry of Industry and Information Technology projects that investment in the telecommunication industry will surpass 350 billion yuan this year, 100 billion yuan of it in construction on a 4G mobile communications network.

          wangxin@chinadaily.com.cn

          (China Daily 03/26/2014 page17)



          The J-Innovation

          Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

          Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

          Washable keyboard

          The future of China & WTO

          JETRO: A decade of development in China

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美福利电影A在线播放| 欧美丰满熟妇性xxxx| 无码人妻aⅴ一区二区三区蜜桃| 亚洲AV无码国产永久播放蜜芽| 亚洲高清在线天堂精品| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 国产自产对白一区| 国产福利片一区二区三区| 国内极度色诱视频网站| 日本一高清二区视频久二区 | 福利一区二区在线观看| 少妇人妻偷人精品免费| 一个人看的www免费高清视频| 久久精品熟女亚洲av艳妇| 久久综合色天天久久综合图片| 国产二区三区不卡免费| 中国CHINA体内裑精亚洲日本| 福利一区二区三区视频在线| 亚洲国产综合专区在线播放| 欧美黑人又粗又大又爽免费 | 欧美国产日本高清不卡| 老师扒下内裤让我爽了一夜| 欧美日韩国产高清视频在线观看| 人成午夜大片免费视频77777| 给我免费观看片在线| 成人国产激情福利久久精品| 国产一卡2卡3卡4卡网站精品| 视频一区无码中出在线| 日韩人妻中文字幕精品| 91国内视频在线观看| 亚洲女人的天堂在线观看| 91热国内精品永久免费观看| 国产精品国语对白一区二区 | 中国毛片网| 国产视色精品亚洲一区二区| 一本色道久久加勒比综合 | 蜜桃网址| 久久精品夜夜夜夜夜久久| 大香伊蕉在人线国产免费| 无码国产精品一区二区av| 国产精品不卡区一区二|