<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          The Third Revision of the Trademark Law: key words
          By Kevin Nie (China IP)
          Updated: 2014-02-21

          Optimization of the trademark application and registration procedure

          The past few years have seen a continuously increasing trend in trademark application and registration, with the number of trademark applications exceeding one million for two years consecutively. The annual increase of applications and the increased awareness of trademark protection in society have led to a dramatic increase of trademark review cases. SAIC statistics show that in 2012, 1,648,000 applications were accepted, more than 16.3% in the previous year, ranking China as the country with the most trademark applications in the world for the 11th year; 1,227,000 applications were examined, more than 1.8% in the previous year; 73,000 trademark opposition cases were ruled, more than 28.7% more than in the previous year; and 52,500 trademark review cases were closed, more than 50% in the previous year. By August 2013, the total trademark registration applications reached over ten million to reach 12,539,000, the total trademark registrations were 8,335,000 and the valid registrations were 6,953,000, with these numbers continuing to be No.1 in the world. (See the figure below)

          The complicated procedure of trademark registration and the frequent occurrence of malicious registration and infringement have been long-standing issues in the trademark arena. Therefore, one of the essential purposes of the new revision has been to streamline the procedure and improve the efficiency of trademark ownership determination. These problems are also high on the agenda of trademark administrations.

          To make it convenient for registration applicants, the new revision includes time limitations applicable to the examination of registration applications and the adjudication of related cases, provides that an applicant may apply for one trademark for more than one category, allows applications to be filed in electronic formats, and restores the examination opinion system. Moreover, it goes further to improve the trademark opposition system by restricting opposition requesters’ qualifications and grounds of opposition and by requiring the Trademark Office to decide whether to grant a trademark immediately after examination, to shorten the period of trademark registration.

          It is particularly worth noting that without precedents in trademark legislation in any other country, the new revision creates and states expressly the specific periods and the longest periods applicable to trademark examination, registration, opposition, review and invalidation, to further improve the examination efficiency.

          According to Yang Yexuan, a former deputy inspector of the SAIC Trademark Review Board, the pile up of trademark ownership cases is not because the trademark examination offices are less efficient, but essentially because trademark applications are seriously in excess of the need of current economic growth, and some of applications are unnecessary, sometimes referred to as “bubbles,” “wastes” or “zombies.” Thus, the fundamental solution to the administrative backlog is not to “add water” but to “take away the firewood to keep the water from boiling.” In other words, from the perspective of scientific development, what should be done is to reverse people’s erroneous ideas concerning political achievements and the value of trademarks, so that the overheated and reckless increase of trademark applications can return to the healthy level.

          Clarification of the well-known mark protection system

          Since its inception, the well-known mark protection system has been effective in curbing the passing off of famous brands. In its implementation, however, there have been a number of companies which take the branch for the root. Treating a well-known mark as an honorary title granted by the state, they take it as their end to file for and gain well-known mark recognition and engage in exaggerated promotions of such marks. They compete unfairly and disturb the normal order in the market. The dissimilation of the well-known mark system deviates from the original legislative intention and endangers the normal system.

          The new revision clarifies the internal meaning of well-known marks by stating that a well-known mark is “a mark well-known to the relevant public.” It further prescribes that a well-known mark should be determined on a case by case and passive basis, and states who should determine well-known marks and how to do it. Particularly, Article 14(5) provides that “the phrase ‘wellknown mark’ shall not be used by any manufacturer or other business operator on any product or its package or container, or in any advertisement, exhibition or other commercial activities.” Article 53 is a penal clause that “If Article 14(5) herein is violated, correction shall be ordered and a fine of RMB 100,000 may be imposed by the relevant local industrial and commercial administration.”

          These provisions are helpful to move the well-known mark system back on track in that it encourages companies to respect market rules and on that condition, and develop their own brands to truly increase their competitiveness in the market.

          According to Yang Yexuan, the well-known mark, as a legal concept, is recognized to establish a system to enlarge the protection of trademarks, which is a usual practice internationally. However, the building and enhancement of this system was never intended to establish any special type of trademarks. The legislation was originally intended to provide fair protection to otherwise unregistered reputable marks and prevent unfair competitive acts such as squatting or infringement upon the reputation. The new revision re-defines the wellknown mark system and its return to rationality.

          Regulation of the trademark agent sector

          The past decade has seen a rapid growth of the trademark agent sector. According to statistics in the Annual Growth Report on the Trademark Strategy of China 2012, by December 31st, 2012, there was a national total of 8,719 trademark agent organizations, of which 1,662 such organizations were newly added in 2012, a new historical record high. (See the figure below)

          On November 6th 2012, SAIC and the Ministry of Justice jointly issued the Measures for the Management of Law Firms Providing Trademark Agent Services that became effective on January 1st 2013. The inclusion of law firms with trademark agent services for statistical purposes led to a considerable perceived growth in the number of trademark agent organizations.



          The J-Innovation

          Steve Jobs died the month that the latest Nobel Prize winners were announced. The coincidence lends itself to speculation about inevitability.

          Recommendation of Global IP Service Agencies with Chinese Business

          Washable keyboard

          The future of China & WTO

          JETRO: A decade of development in China

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 东京热加勒比无码少妇| 毛片无遮挡高清免费| 又色又无遮挡裸体美女网站黄| 国产伦久视频免费观看视频| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪| 美女内射中出草草视频| 精品一区二区三区在线观看l| 又大又紧又粉嫩18p少妇| 国产91小视频在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合精品成人网站| 精品无码久久久久久尤物| 国产一区二区三区不卡视频| 综合图区亚洲另类偷窥| 国产乱人伦真实精品视频| 久久国产热这里只有精品| 国产自拍偷拍视频在线观看| 亚洲精品一区二区三区免| 午夜精品亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲熟女精品一区二区| 国产超高清麻豆精品传媒麻豆精品| 人妻蜜臀久久av不卡| 福利一区二区视频在线| 97人妻中文字幕总站| 亚洲国产成人无码影院| 国产99久久无码精品| 一二三四中文字幕日韩乱码| 在线看国产精品自拍内射| 色呦呦在线视频| 五月婷婷综合色| 五月婷婷导航| 毛片久久网站小视频| 久久国产乱子精品免费女| 蜜臀av一区二区精品字幕| 日产国产一区二区不卡| 国产精品普通话国语对白露脸| 日韩国产亚洲一区二区三区| 亚洲午夜天堂| 香蕉亚洲欧洲在线一区| 好爽受不了了要高潮了av| 日韩视频福利| 制服丝袜亚洲欧美中文字幕|