<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
             
           
          Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC
          (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-12-21

           Apple gains ground in patent war against HTC

          Customers try out HTC Corp products in Taipei. Apple Inc still has one other patent case against HTC. Maurice Tsai / Bloomberg

          WASHINGTON - Apple Inc won a patent-infringement ruling that bans some HTC Corp smartphones from the United States starting next year, bolstering efforts to prove that devices running Google Inc's Android operating system copy the Apple iPhone.

          The US International Trade Commission, in a review of a judge's findings in July, said on Monday that HTC is violating one Apple patent related to data-detection technology and issued a limited import exclusion order that takes effect April 19.

          "HTC will completely remove it from all of our phones soon," Grace Lei, general counsel for HTC, said in an e-mail.

          The six-member commission determined that three other patents in the case weren't infringed.

          While less than what Apple sought, the ruling gives the company its first victory in patent cases designed to slow the growth of Android, which Steve Jobs claimed "ripped off the iPhone". Apple has one other case against HTC, as well as complaints against Samsung Electronics Co and Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc, and is involved in more than a dozen other cases before the trade commission.

          "The battle between Apple and Android is going to continue," said Peter Toren, a patent lawyer with Shulman Rogers. "I'm not sure this decision - the way it is - is enough to push the parties to settlement. Apple doesn't have the leverage of a total exclusionary order."

          The list of affected products and a full reason for the commission's decision, which is subject to appeal and a presidential review, wasn't immediately made public. Apple's original complaint named HTC's Nexus One, Touch Pro, Diamond, Tilt II, Dream, myTouch, Hero and Droid Eris.

          Kristin Huguet, a spokeswoman for Apple, declined to discuss the possibility of a settlement. She repeated the company's position that "competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology".

          Representatives from Google had no immediate comment.

          The ruling is the first definitive decision in the dozens of patent cases that began to proliferate in 2010 as smartphone makers battle over a market that Strategy Analytics Inc said increased 44 percent last quarter from a year earlier to 117 million phones worldwide.

          HTC, the second-largest maker of Android phones, used its partnership with Google to help transform itself from a contract manufacturer founded in 1997 to the biggest US smartphone seller in the third quarter.

          HTC generated about $5 billion in US sales last year, according to a separate patent complaint it filed at the trade agency against Apple. That's more than half of HTC's $9 billion in global sales last year.

          The commission's order applies to new phone imports and doesn't force HTC to pull existing devices off US store shelves.

          HTC phones accounted for 24 percent of the US smartphone market in the third quarter based on shipments, the research company Canalys reported on Oct 31.

          Samsung held 21 percent of the market and Apple 20 percent. The market is volatile, and the Apple iPhone 4s that went on sale in October and Samsung's newest Galaxy phone are likely to change the rankings for the fourth quarter.

          Apple contended in its complaint that the HTC phones infringed four patents. Administrative Law Judge Carl Charneski in July sided with Apple for two of the patents: the data-detection one and the other covering the transmission of multiple types of data. The commission overturned the judge's findings on that patent and affirmed his determination that the remaining two patents weren't infringed.

          Bloomberg News

          (China Daily 12/21/2011 page16)



          Preventing a patent authorization

          Are we able to stop our rivals from obtaining authorization of a patent application that we regard as having substantial defects during the substantive examination, given the fact that the rival companies hane already published their patent applications?

          The protection of design on printed flat works

          How can a party use hedging to prepare for the risk of infringing?

          Can an expired patent be applied again?

          What is the difference between a non-compete obligation and trade secret confidentiality obligation?

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 97精品尹人久久大香线蕉| 国产精品免费中文字幕| 麻豆一区二区三区香蕉视频| 亚洲天堂伊人久久a成人| 99久久精品国产一区二区蜜芽| 欧美中文字幕无线码视频| 不卡在线一区二区三区视频| 开心激情站开心激情网六月婷婷| 国产精品自线在线播放| 青青草一级视频在线观看| 国产性天天综合网| 九九成人免费视频| 东京热大乱系列无码| 国产蜜臀久久av一区二区| 麻豆国产va免费精品高清在线| 丰满少妇高潮无套内谢| 人妻少妇看a偷人无码| 在线高清理伦片a| 青草视频在线观看综合| 亚洲国产精品久久久久久无码| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 免费久久人人爽人人爽AV| 伊人av超碰伊人久久久| 九九热视频在线免费观看| 少妇上班人妻精品偷人| 亚洲qingse中文字幕久久| 色猫成人网| 欧美日韩理论| 国产精品国产三级国产午| 九九在线精品国产| 久久精品国产99国产精品严洲| 粉嫩少妇内射浓精videos| 亚洲一区二区约美女探花| 人妻少妇伦在线无码专区视频| 熟女无套高潮内谢吼叫免费| AV秘 无码一区二| 久久精品国产91久久麻豆| 亚洲一区成人在线视频| 国产成人精品无码免费看| 欧美日本在线一区二区三区| 国产成熟妇女性视频电影|