<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          您現在的位置: Language Tips> Columnist> Liu Shinan  
             
           





           
          Beware of lectures by fake elites
          There is a group of people in this country who regard themselves as the "elites of society".
          [ 2008-06-18 09:59 ]

           Beware of lectures by fake elites

          There is a group of people in this country who regard themselves as the "elites of society". They take themselves to be the most advanced part of society in China's progress toward modernity. They always try to distinguish themselves from the public by saying something special. Their most favorite tactic is to publish an opinion that challenges the masses' common sense. They are best at exaggerating a situation to produce a sensational effect.

          A recent event gave them such a chance.

          Fan Meizhong, a middle school teacher in Sichuan, ran away from a soon-to-collapse classroom when the earthquake struck, leaving his students behind. His act provoked widespread criticism on the Internet and in the media. Most critics remarked that he had violated the professional ethics of a teacher though his involuntary dodging of danger was understandable as a human being.

          Meanwhile, quite a number of people expressed their sympathy for Fan. They placed more emphasis on the need to forgive the weaker side of human nature. They surely have reasons to hold this opinion. And it is reassuring to hear a different voice in the unanimous criticism against Fan, for it represents an effort to create a democratic atmosphere in the circle of critics.

          Some people, however, went too far in defying the public sentiment. They challenged the mainstream opinion by accusing it of "moral autocracy". One of them published a commentary titled "Can we become more noble by defaming Fan"?

          The commentator, who gave his surname as Cao, said the critical remarks on the Internet forums "generally demonstrated an excessively excited sentiment of moral trial". He debunked the online criticism as a "moral campaign the pseudo moralists and young radicals have waged in order to erect a chastity arch (to honor themselves)".

          These words show that Cao was targeting at the whole community of Fan's critics.

          He based his argument on the assumption that everybody has the same "weakness" in his/her innermost soul as Fan displayed. Therefore, he said, people should not blame Fan but should instead regard him as an excusable pal and "reflect on the human weakness together with Fan". He urged Fan's critics to "approach him rather than abandon him; understand him rather than wantonly vilify him".

          Cao was wrong in his argument at least on three points. First, not everybody will behave the same way Fan did, as suggested by Cao. This has been proved by thousands of people who bravely saved others in the quake risking their own lives.

          Second, the fact that most people have the same human weakness does not mean that they are not eligible to criticize Fan. People condemned him out of their understanding of what is morally right and wrong. Do they need to do something heroic before they start criticizing Fan?

          Third, Fan's critics did not blame him for being afraid of death but for ignoring his students' safety and claiming that he would even abandon his mother in the same situation.

          An ugly behavior was made known to the public and the public expressed their disapproval, or even anger, at the behavior. This is only too natural. What traces of "autocracy" can one find in the critical remarks? It is true that some of the critics used harsh words in denouncing Fan. But such unwanted expressions are understandable, given Fan's shameless showing off of his behavior. They are far from "brandishing a moral club" to "kill" Fan, as Cao alleged them to be in his commentary.

          Like other "social elites", Cao "imagines himself as a safeguard of justice" - to quote Cao's own words in his criticism of Fan's critics - and tries to teach the public a lesson about democracy and human rights. Regrettably, the public do not want to hear their garrulous preaching; they have seen through the hypocrites.

          E-mail: liushinan@chinadaily.com.cn

          (China Daily 06/18/2008 page8)

          我要看更多專欄文章 

           

          About the author:
           

          劉式南 高級編輯。1968年畢業于武漢華中師范學院(現華中師范大學)英文系。1982年畢業于北京體育學院(現北京體育大學)研究生院體育情報專業。1982年進入中國日報社,先后擔任體育記者、時政記者、國際新聞編輯、要聞版責任編輯、發稿部主任、《上海英文星報》總編輯、《中國商業周刊》總編輯等職。現任《中國日報》總編輯助理及專欄作家。1997年獲國務院“特殊貢獻專家政府津貼”。2000年被中華全國新聞工作者協會授予“全國百佳新聞工作者”稱號。2006年獲中國新聞獎二等獎(編輯)。

           
          英語點津版權說明:凡注明來源為“英語點津:XXX(署名)”的原創作品,除與中國日報網簽署英語點津內容授權協議的網站外,其他任何網站或單位未經允許不得非法盜鏈、轉載和使用,違者必究。如需使用,請與010-84883631聯系;凡本網注明“來源:XXX(非英語點津)”的作品,均轉載自其它媒體,目的在于傳播更多信息,其他媒體如需轉載,請與稿件來源方聯系,如產生任何問題與本網無關;本網所發布的歌曲、電影片段,版權歸原作者所有,僅供學習與研究,如果侵權,請提供版權證明,以便盡快刪除。
          相關文章 Related Story
           
           
           
          本頻道最新推薦
           
          Walking in the US first lady's shoes
          “準確無誤”如何表達
          英國新晉超女蘇珊大媽改頭換面
          豬流感 swine flu
          你有lottery mentality嗎
          翻吧推薦
           
          論壇熱貼
           
          別亂扔垃圾。怎么譯這個亂字呀?
          橘子,橙子用英文怎么區分?
          看Gossip Girl學英語
          端午節怎么翻譯?
          母親,您在天堂還好嗎?

           

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产超碰无码最新上传| 国产人妇三级视频在线观看| 久久综合久色欧美综合狠狠| 成人无码一区二区三区网站| 婷婷色综合成人成人网小说| 国产成人九九精品二区三区| 99精品国产一区二区三区不卡| 在线播放国产不卡免费视频| 久久久免费精品国产色夜| 国产精品天堂avav在线| 国产精品白浆无码流出| 美女一区二区三区亚洲麻豆| 午夜高清福利在线观看| 丰满的熟妇岳中文字幕| 亚洲激情一区二区三区在线| 国产99久久亚洲综合精品西瓜tv| 久久精品国产精品第一区| 人妻少妇久久中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕精品一区在线| 亚洲AV永久无码嘿嘿嘿嘿| 亚洲熟女乱色一区二区三区| 国内极度色诱视频网站| 国产中文三级全黄| 免费大黄网站在线观看| 久久精品亚洲精品不卡顿| 一区二区亚洲精品国产精| 亚洲AV永久无码嘿嘿嘿嘿| 美女黄网站人色视频免费国产| 国产成人亚洲综合| 国产精品亚洲国际在线看| 久久精品不卡一区二区| 色综合欧美五月俺也去| 不卡国产一区二区三区| 日韩一区精品视频一区二区 | 日夜啪啪一区二区三区| 久久人人爽天天玩人人妻精品| 国内久久人妻风流av免费| 国产无码高清视频不卡| 精品国产成人一区二区| 亚洲精品日本久久一区二区三区| 久久久久国产精品人妻|