<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          USEUROPEAFRICAASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          China
          Home / China / View

          Time to close gap between public view and reality of climate change

          By Op Rana | China Daily | Updated: 2015-02-02 07:49

          People ignorant or in denial of climate change and climate science are not new. Even the division between scientists on climate change is not new, although most (about 97 percent) active climate scientists believe humans are a major cause of climate change, while the number is "radically different" among economic geologists, or scientists who (according to Naomi Klein) study natural formations so that they can be commercially exploited.

          Despite the contradictions and complications, we expect people in the world's most advanced country to accord some importance to, if not respect, the findings of scientists. But a Pew Research Center poll released on Jan 29 says American public and scientists hold vastly different views on climate change, genetically modified (GM) foods and (not surprisingly) evolution.

          About 87 percent of the scientists who responded to the Pew poll said human activity was the main cause of climate change, but only 50 percent of the general public agreed with them. Disturbingly, about 25 of the Americans polled said there was no "solid evidence" to prove that the climate was warming - the percentage of such skeptics in a 2009 survey was only 11 percent.

          The divide over GM foods was wider, with 88 percent of the scientists surveyed saying they were safe to eat compared with 37 percent of the public. The gap between scientists and the general public on evolution was wide too, with 98 percent of the scientists saying humans had evolved over time, compared with 65 percent of the public.

          The difference in the beliefs (based on evidence, empirical or otherwise) of scientists and the public should not be surprising, because about 53 percent of the "economic scientists" do not believe in human-caused climate change.

          The fact is, as Klein says in her latest book, This Changes Everything: "... we are all inclined to denial when the truth is too costly - whether emotionally, intellectually, or financially. As Upton Sinclair ... observed: 'It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.'"

          The Pew survey results are not surprising because there is a connection between the refusal to "accept the science of climate change and social and economic privilege". Most of the climate change deniers are not only conservative but also "white and male" - a group with higher than average income. Worse, members of this group are more prone to be highly confident of their views even if they are scientifically wrong.

          The Pew study reveals the difference between perception (of the American public) and reality (which scientists, based on empirical evidence, believe in). If we juxtapose the American public with the people in the rest of the world, we are most likely to get the same result, but that doesn't change the reality, that the planet and its attributes are not what they should have been in natural circumstances and that humans are responsible for that because they are the only beings who have the power to alter it.

          And as Alan Leshner, the chief executive of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, a leading scientific organization that publishes the journal Science, said: "Speaking up for the importance of science to society is our only hope, and scientists must not shy away from engaging with the public, even on the most polarizing science-based topics." Factors, including political views on climate change and religious beliefs on evolution, are out to trump science because of lack of scientific understanding among people.

          This is a dangerous trend in times when science should be ruling the minds of the people. This trend needs to be countered with the help of education programs sponsored by governments, especially governments in countries like China, which know what the reality of climate change is and how it can be mitigated.

          Will China, and other countries most threatened by climate change, take up this challenge?

          The author is a senior editor with China Daily. oprana@hotmail.com

          Editor's picks
          Copyright 1995 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 天堂mv在线mv免费mv香蕉| 一本伊大人香蕉久久网手机| 亚洲一区二区偷拍精品| av一区二区人妻无码| 亚洲欧美人成人让影院| 最新亚洲人成网站在线影院| 一区二区三区自拍偷拍视频| 樱花草在线社区www| 免费久久人人爽人人爽AV| 免费精品一区二区中文字幕| 人人人澡人人肉久久精品| 中文字幕日韩有码av| 四虎成人精品永久免费av| 亚洲国产欧美在线看片一国产| 国产亚洲欧美精品一区| 久久精品国产亚洲av熟女| 白嫩人妻精品一二三四区| 国内a级毛片| 开心激情站一区二区三区| a4yy私人毛片| 无码国产精品一区二区免费3p| 99精品国产闺蜜国产在线闺蜜| 日本一区二区三区四区黄色| 国产在线精品欧美日韩电影| 乱女乱妇熟女熟妇综合网| 伊人久久大香线蕉av网| 国产精品白嫩极品在线看| 国产日韩精品一区在线不卡| 亚洲精品国产中文字幕| 国产成人综合欧美精品久久| 国产chinesehdxxxx老太婆| 日本国产精品第一页久久| 亚洲老熟女一区二区三区| 精品国产成人国产在线视| 伊人热热久久原色播放WWW| 久久一二三四区中文字幕| 人妻中文字幕不卡精品| 午夜国产精品福利一二| 骚片av蜜桃精品一区| 激情久久综合精品久久人妻| 中文国产不卡一区二区|