<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          Updated: 2017-06-13 07:05

          By Joseph Li in Hong Kong(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Former chief secretary for administration Henry Tang Ying-yen believes Hong Kong people, including the legal profession, must accept that the country's top legislature has the lawful authority to exercise interpretations of the Basic Law, and that there was a need to interpret the Basic Law on each occasion.

          Since the handover in 1997, the National People's Congress Standing Committee (NPCSC) has interpreted provisions of the Basic Law on five occasions.

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          "The Basic Law has clearly spelt out that the NPCSC has the power to interpret the Basic Law and the NPCSC will not exercise an interpretation without reasons," he said.

          "We have seen five interpretations of Basic Law provisions since 1997 and each interpretation was justified. They include interpretations related to the right of abode case in 1999, the term of office of the Chief Executive in 2005 and the Congo case in 2011 because it involved foreign affairs," he explained.

          In a recent newspaper interview Andrew Li Kwok-nang, former chief justice of the Court of Final Appeal, said the latest interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 related to oaths and disqualification of certain Legislative Council members last year yielded a negative public impression on judicial independence in Hong Kong. This is because it occurred before the court ruling.

          Tang disagreed but said he understood why the former chief justice made such comments.

          He said: "For the case of LegCo oath fiasco, the timing of interpretation of Basic Law Article 104 before the ruling was appropriate. If the interpretation took place after the ruling and the ruling happened to be inconsistent with the interpretation, people would grumble that the interpretation in effect overturned the court verdict."

          Tang, however, admitted the interpretation on the right-of-abode case in 1999 was highly controversial because it was the very first time the NPCSC interpreted Basic Law provisions. It happened after the Court of Final Appeal had handed down a ruling.

          joseph@chinadailyhk.com

          SAR urged to accept top legislature's authority to interpret Basic Law

          (HK Edition 06/13/2017 page4)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 老少配老妇老熟女中文普通话| 日韩一区二区三区精彩视频| 成人av一区二区亚洲精| 亚洲最大的熟女水蜜桃AV网站| 久久久久久一级毛片免费无遮挡 | 亚洲精品天堂在线观看| 国内精品久久久久影院蜜芽| 亚洲综合精品第一页| 国产精品福利自产拍久久| 欧美熟妇乱子伦XX视频| 正在播放酒店约少妇高潮| 97超碰精品成人国产| 強壮公弄得我次次高潮A片| 亚洲av熟女天堂系列| 国产日韩一区二区天美麻豆| 国产绿帽在线视频看| 高清国产av一区二区三区| 8av国产精品爽爽ⅴa在线观看| 欧美亚洲另类制服卡通动漫 | 国产精品自拍实拍在线看| 国产精品视频第一第二区| 99视频精品国产免费观看| 亚洲性图日本一区二区三区 | 亚洲国产日韩欧美一区二区三区| 久久久一本精品99久久精品88| 黄色亚洲一区二区三区四区 | 欧美巨大极度另类| 国产成人AV无码精品天堂| 国内精品人妻一区二区三区| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天5| 大屁股国产白浆一二区| 久久婷婷综合色一区二区| 高清免费毛片| 中文无码妇乱子伦视频| 日本少妇被黑人猛cao| 欧美自拍另类欧美综合图片区| 久久精品人妻av一区二区| 国产精品99中文字幕| 国产成人亚洲精品无码青APP | 亚洲蜜臀av乱码久久| 国产在线午夜不卡精品影院|