<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Housing Fund a sensible decision

          Updated: 2015-01-05 06:18

          By Raymond So(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Hong Kong has a serious housing problem. Solving it is now a major government priority. According to the government's recently announced Long-Term Housing Strategy, 290,000 public housing units, both public rental housing and home ownership scheme units, will be built. Although this 290,000 number is still believed by many to be insufficient, it has almost twice the amount currently being produced. On average, the current number of public housing units being built annually is around 15,000 units. This sharp increase in housing production obviously exerts considerable financial pressure on the Housing Authority (HA).

          The HA' s cash and investment balance is, therefore, likely to fall significantly. The existing balance is over HK$60 billion, but estimates show it will decline to around HK$28 billion in four years. Simple arithmetic tells us that when more housing units are added to the list, the HA will have insufficient funds to meet its needs.

          On different occasions, the HA has publicly discussed the financial difficulties it faces. In this year's budget speech, Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah asked the HA to estimate the financial gap which will result from the provision of further public housing. This is so the government can prepare for it. A long-term housing strategy cannot be accomplished without a strong financial commitment from the government. But how much money should it inject into the HA and when? The government already has to fund many public services. Although housing is a top priority, healthcare, education, social welfare are also important. The government should not be pressured to support public housing at the expense of other social services. The allocation of public resources clearly must be handled with great care.

          Housing Fund a sensible decision

          So the financial secretary was right when he said establishing a housing fund was timely and sensible. Of course, whatever the government does will always attract criticism. But people should not be too quick to criticize.

          Estimating the fiscal gap faced by the Housing Authority is a difficult task. As the HA is a self-financing organization, Hong Kong cannot build endless public housing units because resources are limited. According to new housing construction indicators, a huge capital injection from the government may be necessary. This has also been suggested by the financial secretary's blog postings - the government is worried about having to commit over HK$100 billion. While this is a lot, but Hong Kong can still handle this because of its large financial reserves. Nevertheless, the housing problem is not a one-off issue. Another long-term housing strategy will be needed after the current one ends. If the HA cannot be self-financing in the long term, it may have to seek further funding from the government. Clearly this will be a considerable financial burden for the government.

          Because of these considerations, the proposed housing fund is necessary. The idea behind it is simple: it intends to set aside more reserves during the good years so the HA has adequate financial resource when more are needed. The beauty of the fund is that it is specifically designated for public housing; financial resources for the fund will not be used in other areas. If there was not such a fund, future use of financial resources in public housing could not be guaranteed. It is possible that financial or political considerations might even prevent the government investing in public housing in future. Therefore, the establishment of the fund also demonstrates the long-term commitment of the government.

          Another advantage of the fund is that money can be accumulated gradually. This will probably mean it will only have a minimal impact on the government's current public spending.

          Of course, every government action is subject to criticism. Some people may think the fund will reduce the number of government "sweeteners" offered in future budgets. However, budgets should not always be about "sweeteners". Public finance should always aim to be an investment in the future.

          The author is the dean of School of Business in Hang Seng Management College.

          (HK Edition 01/05/2015 page1)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产a网站| 最近的最新的中文字幕视频| av亚洲一区二区在线| 本免费Av无码专区一区| 亚洲一区二区三区在线| h动态图男女啪啪27报gif| 亚洲一区国色天香| 人妻中文字幕免费观看 | 人妻无码| 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天bl| 老子午夜精品无码| 国产a√精品区二区三区四区| 亚洲一区二区三区十八禁| 无码人妻丰满熟妇区五十路| 久久这里都是精品二| 欧美老少配性行为| 亚洲欧美色中文字幕| 日韩高清福利视频在线观看 | 国产三区二区| 网友自拍视频一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品综合久久20| 国产精品亚洲一区二区z| 久久综合色之久久综合| 国产综合久久久久久鬼色| 99久久精品视香蕉蕉| 欧美拍拍视频免费大全| 伊人色综合久久天天小片| 久久成人综合亚洲精品欧美| 成人又黄又爽又色的视频| 一区二区三区av天堂| 精品午夜福利在线视在亚洲| 精品亚洲国产成人av| 国产又色又爽又黄的视频在线| 一区二区三区精品不卡| 人人爱天天做夜夜爽| 国产蜜臀av在线一区二区| 久久香蕉欧美精品| 日韩精品一区二区在线视| 极品vpswindows少妇| 无码中文字幕精品推荐| 一区二区三区四区亚洲自拍|