<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Housing Fund a sensible decision

          Updated: 2015-01-05 06:18

          By Raymond So(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Hong Kong has a serious housing problem. Solving it is now a major government priority. According to the government's recently announced Long-Term Housing Strategy, 290,000 public housing units, both public rental housing and home ownership scheme units, will be built. Although this 290,000 number is still believed by many to be insufficient, it has almost twice the amount currently being produced. On average, the current number of public housing units being built annually is around 15,000 units. This sharp increase in housing production obviously exerts considerable financial pressure on the Housing Authority (HA).

          The HA' s cash and investment balance is, therefore, likely to fall significantly. The existing balance is over HK$60 billion, but estimates show it will decline to around HK$28 billion in four years. Simple arithmetic tells us that when more housing units are added to the list, the HA will have insufficient funds to meet its needs.

          On different occasions, the HA has publicly discussed the financial difficulties it faces. In this year's budget speech, Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah asked the HA to estimate the financial gap which will result from the provision of further public housing. This is so the government can prepare for it. A long-term housing strategy cannot be accomplished without a strong financial commitment from the government. But how much money should it inject into the HA and when? The government already has to fund many public services. Although housing is a top priority, healthcare, education, social welfare are also important. The government should not be pressured to support public housing at the expense of other social services. The allocation of public resources clearly must be handled with great care.

          Housing Fund a sensible decision

          So the financial secretary was right when he said establishing a housing fund was timely and sensible. Of course, whatever the government does will always attract criticism. But people should not be too quick to criticize.

          Estimating the fiscal gap faced by the Housing Authority is a difficult task. As the HA is a self-financing organization, Hong Kong cannot build endless public housing units because resources are limited. According to new housing construction indicators, a huge capital injection from the government may be necessary. This has also been suggested by the financial secretary's blog postings - the government is worried about having to commit over HK$100 billion. While this is a lot, but Hong Kong can still handle this because of its large financial reserves. Nevertheless, the housing problem is not a one-off issue. Another long-term housing strategy will be needed after the current one ends. If the HA cannot be self-financing in the long term, it may have to seek further funding from the government. Clearly this will be a considerable financial burden for the government.

          Because of these considerations, the proposed housing fund is necessary. The idea behind it is simple: it intends to set aside more reserves during the good years so the HA has adequate financial resource when more are needed. The beauty of the fund is that it is specifically designated for public housing; financial resources for the fund will not be used in other areas. If there was not such a fund, future use of financial resources in public housing could not be guaranteed. It is possible that financial or political considerations might even prevent the government investing in public housing in future. Therefore, the establishment of the fund also demonstrates the long-term commitment of the government.

          Another advantage of the fund is that money can be accumulated gradually. This will probably mean it will only have a minimal impact on the government's current public spending.

          Of course, every government action is subject to criticism. Some people may think the fund will reduce the number of government "sweeteners" offered in future budgets. However, budgets should not always be about "sweeteners". Public finance should always aim to be an investment in the future.

          The author is the dean of School of Business in Hang Seng Management College.

          (HK Edition 01/05/2015 page1)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品一在线观看| 国产精品免费麻豆入口| 亚洲精品人成在线观看| 国产极品丝尤物在线观看| 国产精品亚洲av三区色| 亚洲午夜福利精品无码不卡| 狠狠色丁香婷婷综合尤物| 天下第一社区在线观看| 91精品国产自产91精品| 精品人妻伦一二三区久久aaa片| 久久精品国产亚洲av热一区| 日夜啪啪一区二区三区| 国产精品剧情亚洲二区| 成人无码h真人在线网站| 精品 日韩 国产 欧美 视频| 久久精品国产一区二区涩涩| 中文字幕亚洲无线码在线| 蜜桃视频在线观看网站免费| 亚洲人交乣女bbw| 高清国产亚洲精品自在久久| 天堂a无码a无线孕交| 亚洲欧美一区二区成人片| 亚洲V天堂V手机在线| 婷婷综合亚洲| 男女激情一区二区三区| 欧美极品色午夜在线视频| 国产精品夫妇激情啪发布| 国产熟女精品一区二区三区| 亚洲天堂久久一区av| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 爱啪啪精品一区二区三区| 一区二区免费视频中文乱码| xxxx丰满少妇高潮| 公交车最后一排| 鲁一鲁一鲁一鲁一澡| 四虎影视库国产精品一区| 成人国产精品视频频| 亚洲成A人片在线观看的电影| 91精品国产91久久综合桃花| 99久久精品国产一区色| 天堂V亚洲国产V第一次|