<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Increasing social mobility, education opportunities in HK

          Updated: 2012-12-29 07:54

          By Ho Shun-Man(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          It has been said that Hong Kong is "down streaming", i.e., that the quality of life of the middle class has been deteriorating. In recent years, there have been occasional media reports suggesting that many youngsters are dissatisfied with their employment, income and upward mobility, and are losing their self-confidence.

          A study by the Hong Kong Professional and Senior Executives Association (HKPSEA) in 2010, (for which this author was one of the investigators), found that 21 percent of the post-80s generation had experienced downward mobility and 74 percent had experienced no mobility over the past five years. Over half of them believed that social mobility was worse than 15 years ago.

          Many social leaders argue that social equality and mobility should be a major agenda item for the current administration. Higher social mobility is usually associated with more equal opportunities for all, greater recognition of personal effort and higher work motivation. In contrast, insufficient social mobility is associated with negative consequences, such as greater dissatisfaction over the gap between the rich and poor, lower social harmony and lower personal motivation to work hard.

          Many factors can affect social mobility and career achievement, such as personal attributes, family background, demographics, economic growth, the education system, labor market structure and other public policies. Slow economic growth after the global financial crisis clearly affected employment, incomes and social mobility in the short run. Stable economic growth is the most important external factor in improving social mobility. Recent studies have also found that a higher education level and a wealthier family background are associated with the likelihood of being in the middle class.

          In the HKPSEA study, over half of the respondents felt that the most significant obstacle to their social mobility was a lack of educational qualifications. Only about a third of the respondents blamed the economic situation or government policies, and only 17 percent attributed their lack of mobility to their less fortunate family background. About two thirds of these post-80s respondents agreed that pursing post-secondary education can increase social mobility, and 77 percent agreed with the statement that "personal hard work and other non-family factors are more important than family background". Over two thirds of the youngsters still regarded Hong Kong as a fair place with plenty of mobility opportunities. They indicated a willingness to pursue further education to raise their academic qualifications and enhance their career prospects. Such a positive attitude is somewhat different from what is sometimes reported in the media.

          Fair or equal educational opportunities can be seen as the minimum assurance for greater social mobility. Although educational equality may not necessarily lead to social equality, educational inequality can deepen social inequality. Therefore, we need to ensure maximum education equality, especially for lower-income families.

          In terms of educational equality, the minimum the government can do is to ensure educational resources are invested fairly. Unfortunately, the quotas of UGC-funded first-degree places has been frozen at 14,500 since 1994 (only 18 percent of the age-group versus the world average of 26 percent), and this is far from being able to satisfy the need of some 26,000 applicants who meet the minimum university entrance requirements (with another 24,000 students who did not meet this requirement).

          Most students who are not admitted to UGC-funded first-degree programs are forced to enter high-cost self-financed sub-degree (or some first-degree) programs) with little or no government subsidies (except loans). This creates a heavy financial burden for many lower-income families. Furthermore, only a small percentage of those associate degree graduates can ultimately be admitted to a funded top-up degree programme.

          In fact, only 26 percent of Hong Kong's workforce has tertiary qualifications, and this has put Hong Kong far behind the majority of developed economies. To ensure more equal opportunities for post-secondary education and to sustain Hong Kong's international competitiveness, many Hong Kong people have urged the government to increase funding substantially and urgently to allow more young people to pursue funded first-degree studies.

          The author is a senior university professor and administrator.

          (HK Edition 12/29/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊人久久精品无码麻豆一区| 国产成人亚洲综合图区| 在线看无码的免费网站| 99久久精品国产一区二区暴力| 98精品全国免费观看视频| 人与性动交aaaabbbb视频| 开心色怡人综合网站| 国产稚嫩高中生呻吟激情在线视频 | 亚洲一区黄色| 欧美XXXX黑人又粗又长精品| 国产真人做爰免费视频| 久久久无码精品国产一区| 国产免费午夜福利在线观看| 国产日韩精品中文字幕| 蜜桃久久精品成人无码av| 欧美videosdesexo肥婆| 亚洲精品福利一区二区三区蜜桃| 午夜福利激情一区二区三区| 在线精品国产中文字幕| 无码伊人久久大杳蕉中文无码| 国产精品视频久久| 日韩精品人妻黄色一级片| 成人做受视频试看60秒| 久久精品成人免费看| 毛片一级在线| 日韩欧国产美一区二区在线| 高清自拍亚洲精品二区| 天堂网亚洲综合在线| 久久人妻无码一区二区三区av | 亚洲欧美偷国产日韩| 日本一区二区三区福利视频| 另类 专区 欧美 制服丝袜| 激情五月天自拍偷拍视频| 久久久国产精品樱花网站| 国产精品免费电影| 亚洲精品揄拍自拍首页一| 久久香蕉国产线看观看怡红院妓院| 国产一区二区三区黄网| 福利导航第一福利导航| 国产成人综合色视频精品| 农村乱色一区二区高清视频|