<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Increasing social mobility, education opportunities in HK

          Updated: 2012-12-29 07:54

          By Ho Shun-Man(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          It has been said that Hong Kong is "down streaming", i.e., that the quality of life of the middle class has been deteriorating. In recent years, there have been occasional media reports suggesting that many youngsters are dissatisfied with their employment, income and upward mobility, and are losing their self-confidence.

          A study by the Hong Kong Professional and Senior Executives Association (HKPSEA) in 2010, (for which this author was one of the investigators), found that 21 percent of the post-80s generation had experienced downward mobility and 74 percent had experienced no mobility over the past five years. Over half of them believed that social mobility was worse than 15 years ago.

          Many social leaders argue that social equality and mobility should be a major agenda item for the current administration. Higher social mobility is usually associated with more equal opportunities for all, greater recognition of personal effort and higher work motivation. In contrast, insufficient social mobility is associated with negative consequences, such as greater dissatisfaction over the gap between the rich and poor, lower social harmony and lower personal motivation to work hard.

          Many factors can affect social mobility and career achievement, such as personal attributes, family background, demographics, economic growth, the education system, labor market structure and other public policies. Slow economic growth after the global financial crisis clearly affected employment, incomes and social mobility in the short run. Stable economic growth is the most important external factor in improving social mobility. Recent studies have also found that a higher education level and a wealthier family background are associated with the likelihood of being in the middle class.

          In the HKPSEA study, over half of the respondents felt that the most significant obstacle to their social mobility was a lack of educational qualifications. Only about a third of the respondents blamed the economic situation or government policies, and only 17 percent attributed their lack of mobility to their less fortunate family background. About two thirds of these post-80s respondents agreed that pursing post-secondary education can increase social mobility, and 77 percent agreed with the statement that "personal hard work and other non-family factors are more important than family background". Over two thirds of the youngsters still regarded Hong Kong as a fair place with plenty of mobility opportunities. They indicated a willingness to pursue further education to raise their academic qualifications and enhance their career prospects. Such a positive attitude is somewhat different from what is sometimes reported in the media.

          Fair or equal educational opportunities can be seen as the minimum assurance for greater social mobility. Although educational equality may not necessarily lead to social equality, educational inequality can deepen social inequality. Therefore, we need to ensure maximum education equality, especially for lower-income families.

          In terms of educational equality, the minimum the government can do is to ensure educational resources are invested fairly. Unfortunately, the quotas of UGC-funded first-degree places has been frozen at 14,500 since 1994 (only 18 percent of the age-group versus the world average of 26 percent), and this is far from being able to satisfy the need of some 26,000 applicants who meet the minimum university entrance requirements (with another 24,000 students who did not meet this requirement).

          Most students who are not admitted to UGC-funded first-degree programs are forced to enter high-cost self-financed sub-degree (or some first-degree) programs) with little or no government subsidies (except loans). This creates a heavy financial burden for many lower-income families. Furthermore, only a small percentage of those associate degree graduates can ultimately be admitted to a funded top-up degree programme.

          In fact, only 26 percent of Hong Kong's workforce has tertiary qualifications, and this has put Hong Kong far behind the majority of developed economies. To ensure more equal opportunities for post-secondary education and to sustain Hong Kong's international competitiveness, many Hong Kong people have urged the government to increase funding substantially and urgently to allow more young people to pursue funded first-degree studies.

          The author is a senior university professor and administrator.

          (HK Edition 12/29/2012 page3)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 91国产自拍一区二区三区| 91精品国产免费久久久久久| 久久综合色之久久综合色| 国产999久久高清免费观看| 久久精品国产99久久六动漫| 四虎成人免费视频在线播放| 精品国产AV色欲果冻传媒| 日本老熟女一二三区视频| 亚洲国产一区二区三区最新| 图片区 小说区 区 亚洲五月| 色综合色国产热无码一| 日本亚洲成高清一区二区三区| 97人人添人人澡人人澡人人澡| 亚洲熟妇AV乱码在线观看| 成人自拍小视频在线观看| 国产亚洲一二三区精品| 色猫咪av在线观看| 青青草原网站在线观看| www欧美在线观看| 丁香婷婷色综合激情五月| 亚洲一本之道高清乱码| 午夜成人无码免费看网站| 中文字幕第一区| 一区二区亚洲精品国产精| 欧美另类 自拍 亚洲 图区| 久久国产自偷自偷免费一区 | 任我爽精品视频在线播放| 国产一卡2卡3卡四卡精品国色无边| 西西人体大胆444WWW| jαpαnesehd熟女熟妇伦| 黄色A级国产免费大片视频| 久视频精品线在线观看| 九九热中文字幕在线视频| 91麻豆国产视频| 亚洲综合一区二区三区在线 | 亚日韩精品一区二区三区| 国产精品久久露脸蜜臀| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁一级毛片 | 女人喷水高潮时的视频网站| 久久99久国产精品66| 久久久久综合中文字幕|