<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          'No win, no fee' fund for middle class

          Updated: 2007-07-10 06:48

          By Teddy Ng(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Law Reform Commission yesterday proposed to set up an independent fund to help middle-income families to launch strong civil lawsuit on a conditional fee basis.

          That means the litigants will not have to pay legal fees unless they win the cases.

          The commission suggested the self-financed Conditional Legal Aid Fund (CLAF) be managed by a statutory body.

          The body will screen applications for lawsuits which have a reasonable prospect of success, and brief the cases to private lawyers.

          The fund will cover seven types of cases, including personal injury, commercial, product liability and consumer cases, probate cases involving an estate, employment disputes, professional negligence and defamation case.

          The commission said the upper financial eligibility of CLAF should be set between HK$2 million and HK$3 million, which does not include fixed assets.

          The commission's conditional fees sub-committee chairman, Edward Chen, said the government needed to provide the start-up capital for the fund, which he estimated would not involve huge public spending.

          It has been suggested should the applicants win the case, they should contribute at least 15 to 20 percent of their compensation claims to the fund. The contribution is lower than the 25 to 30 percent usually charged by unregulated claim intermediaries, who take advantage of legal loopholes to make similar "no win, no fees" arrangements for litigants.

          Applicants' lawyers would be able to receive a success fee, which Chen estimated could be up to 50 percent, in addition to the normal fees they charge.

          Applicants have nothing to lose even if they fail as the fund would pay the opponent's legal cost, but lawyers have the risk of not being paid under such circumstances.

          Chen said conditional fees basis was necessary because prohibitive legal costs barred many people from taking legal action.

          Currently 30 percent of households in Hong Kong, including most middle-income families, cannot enjoy the two legal aid schemes, which capped the financial resources for each applicant at HK$158,300 and HK$439,800, respectively.

          Chen believed the number of civil lawsuits would increase after the establishment of the fund, but ruled out the possibility that applicants would abuse the system by launching meaningless cases.

          "More civil lawsuits will indicate that more people have access to justice," he said.

          The sub-committee member, Paul Tsieh, believed lawyers, including the well-established legal firms with overseas experience, would be interested in taking conditional fees cases despite the risk of not getting paid.

          He said many middle-income people decided not to take legal action to claim compensation as they don't understand legal formalities.

          "These cases have high chances of winning," he said.

          Welcoming the proposal, Law Society of Hong Kong president Lester Huang said many people who could not afford legal cost decide to litigate in person, and the CLAF would provide assistance to them.

          Alvin Lee Chi-wing, chairman of Voice of Middle Class, said that one of his friends decided not to take legal action to claim HK$100,000 business compensation after learning that the lawyer might charge HK$200,000.

          "My friend may need to sell her flat to pay the opponent's legal cost if he loses," he said.

          Hong Kong Bar Association vice-chairman Clive Grossman, however, said experienced practitioners might not be attracted to take CLAF cases, which would affect the fund service quality.

          Another senior counsel Ronny Tong said he feared that lawyers would only select cases with higher chances of winning, while those with less success chance would not be entertained.

          "It is not uncommon that cases with less winning chances turn out to be cases with high public interest at later stage," he said.

          (HK Edition 07/10/2007 page6)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲AV蜜桃永久无码精品| 在线天堂中文新版www| 亚洲avav天堂av在线网毛片| 午夜日本永久乱码免费播放片| 日本高清一区免费中文视频| 国产精品美女一区二三区| 国产精品久久久久婷婷五月 | 国产亚洲欧洲三级片A级| 亚洲成a人无码av波多野| 亚洲乱码日产精品m| 国内精品一区二区不卡| 色就色偷拍综合一二三区| 无码日韩做暖暖大全免费不卡| 国产在线精品国偷产拍| 55大东北熟女啪啪嗷嗷叫| 少妇午夜福利一区二区三区| 中文字幕乱码十国产乱码| 国产精品亚洲二区在线播放| 国产初高中生粉嫩无套第一次| 亚洲精品香蕉一区二区| 亚洲一区二区偷拍精品| 爆乳日韩尤物无码一区| 午夜福利二区无码在线| 国产精品乱人伦一区二区| 久热天堂在线视频精品伊人| 国产日韩精品中文字幕| 亚洲国产午夜精品理论片| 久久久久无码精品国产app| 精品国产美女av久久久久| 久久久久免费看成人影片| a男人的天堂久久a毛片| 免费在线成人网| 久久精品国产亚洲αv忘忧草| 国产尤物精品自在拍视频首页| 无码一区中文字幕| 国产精品中文字幕一区| 三上悠亚日韩精品二区| 中文人妻AV高清一区二区| 国产青草亚洲香蕉精品久久 | 欧美日韩精品一区二区视频| 在线高清理伦片a|