<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          'No win, no fee' fund for middle class

          Updated: 2007-07-10 06:48

          By Teddy Ng(HK Edition)

            Print Mail Large Medium  Small

          Law Reform Commission yesterday proposed to set up an independent fund to help middle-income families to launch strong civil lawsuit on a conditional fee basis.

          That means the litigants will not have to pay legal fees unless they win the cases.

          The commission suggested the self-financed Conditional Legal Aid Fund (CLAF) be managed by a statutory body.

          The body will screen applications for lawsuits which have a reasonable prospect of success, and brief the cases to private lawyers.

          The fund will cover seven types of cases, including personal injury, commercial, product liability and consumer cases, probate cases involving an estate, employment disputes, professional negligence and defamation case.

          The commission said the upper financial eligibility of CLAF should be set between HK$2 million and HK$3 million, which does not include fixed assets.

          The commission's conditional fees sub-committee chairman, Edward Chen, said the government needed to provide the start-up capital for the fund, which he estimated would not involve huge public spending.

          It has been suggested should the applicants win the case, they should contribute at least 15 to 20 percent of their compensation claims to the fund. The contribution is lower than the 25 to 30 percent usually charged by unregulated claim intermediaries, who take advantage of legal loopholes to make similar "no win, no fees" arrangements for litigants.

          Applicants' lawyers would be able to receive a success fee, which Chen estimated could be up to 50 percent, in addition to the normal fees they charge.

          Applicants have nothing to lose even if they fail as the fund would pay the opponent's legal cost, but lawyers have the risk of not being paid under such circumstances.

          Chen said conditional fees basis was necessary because prohibitive legal costs barred many people from taking legal action.

          Currently 30 percent of households in Hong Kong, including most middle-income families, cannot enjoy the two legal aid schemes, which capped the financial resources for each applicant at HK$158,300 and HK$439,800, respectively.

          Chen believed the number of civil lawsuits would increase after the establishment of the fund, but ruled out the possibility that applicants would abuse the system by launching meaningless cases.

          "More civil lawsuits will indicate that more people have access to justice," he said.

          The sub-committee member, Paul Tsieh, believed lawyers, including the well-established legal firms with overseas experience, would be interested in taking conditional fees cases despite the risk of not getting paid.

          He said many middle-income people decided not to take legal action to claim compensation as they don't understand legal formalities.

          "These cases have high chances of winning," he said.

          Welcoming the proposal, Law Society of Hong Kong president Lester Huang said many people who could not afford legal cost decide to litigate in person, and the CLAF would provide assistance to them.

          Alvin Lee Chi-wing, chairman of Voice of Middle Class, said that one of his friends decided not to take legal action to claim HK$100,000 business compensation after learning that the lawyer might charge HK$200,000.

          "My friend may need to sell her flat to pay the opponent's legal cost if he loses," he said.

          Hong Kong Bar Association vice-chairman Clive Grossman, however, said experienced practitioners might not be attracted to take CLAF cases, which would affect the fund service quality.

          Another senior counsel Ronny Tong said he feared that lawyers would only select cases with higher chances of winning, while those with less success chance would not be entertained.

          "It is not uncommon that cases with less winning chances turn out to be cases with high public interest at later stage," he said.

          (HK Edition 07/10/2007 page6)

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美 日韩 国产 成人 在线观看| 中文字幕人妻av12| 国产精品高清中文字幕| 欧美激情视频一区二区三区免费| 国产一级小视频| 最新无码专区视频在线| 亚洲成色在线综合网站| 亚洲成人资源在线观看| 亚洲国产精品成人一区二区在线| 亚洲人成电影网站色mp4| 男男欧美一区二区| 亚洲精品日韩中文字幕| 国产精品高清中文字幕| 亚洲人成网线在线播放VA| 亚洲各类熟女们中文字幕| 手机在线观看av片| 日韩av爽爽爽久久久久久| 国产短视频一区二区三区| 久热伊人精品国产中文| 最新亚洲国产手机在线| 巨胸美乳无码人妻视频| 国产精品一区二区三区污 | 99在线视频免费观看| 日韩精品视频一区二区不卡| 中文字幕亚洲制服在线看| 日本午夜精品一区二区三区电影| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 黄色三级毛片网站| 国产一区二区日韩在线| 97成人碰碰久久人人超级碰oo| 九九在线精品国产| 亚欧美国产综合| 亚洲一区精品伊人久久| 国产精品国产三级国产专业| av网站免费线看精品| 亚洲综合色88综合天堂| 久久91综合国产91久久精品| 熟妇的味道hd中文字幕| 国产午夜福利在线视频| 亚洲国产精品久久电影欧美| 国产午夜福利视频第三区|