UN approves 10,000 peacekeepers for southern Sudan
(Agencies)
Updated: 2005-03-25 08:35

The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on Thursday to authorize a 10,000-strong peacekeeping force for southern Sudan but remained deadlocked on any action for Darfur in the west.

The peacekeepers are to monitor a crucial agreement signed in January between the Khartoum government and southern rebels that ended a 21-year old civil war. That conflict cost 2 million lives and forced 4 million people from their homes.

The U.N. Security Council voted unanimously on March 24, 2005 to authorize a 10,000-strong peacekeeping force for southern Sudan but remained deadlocked on any action for Darfur in the west. [Reuters]

The council's resolution, drafted by the United States, calls for up to 10,000 military personnel, a civilian component up to 715 police, which U.N. officials say will take several months to get on the ground.

In their accord, Khartoum and the Southern Peoples Liberation Movement agreed on political power-sharing arrangements and a division of country's oil wealth. They also called for integrated security forces in southern Sudan, the Nuba Mountains, the Southern Blue Nile and in Khartoum.

In six years, southerners, mainly Christians and animists, would be entitled to a referendum to determine whether they wanted to form their own state and break from the Islamic-dominated north.

DARFUR DEADLOCK

But Security Council members remained deadlocked over imposing sanctions on Darfur -- and where to try perpetrators of atrocities with France having introduced a resolution to send war crimes suspects to the International Criminal Court, which the United States opposes.

Displaced Sudanese from the Darfur region fetch water from a wadi (water well) in Aweil, Southeast of Sudan capital Khartoum, February 19, 2005. The U.N estimates there are more than 2 million people living in the camps outside Khartoum. [Reuters]

However, France on Thursday delayed a vote on the court until next week to give delegations more time, especially the United States. European diplomats still hope to get an abstention from Washington, although that appears unlikely.

The Bush administration rejects the court, the world's first permanent criminal tribunal set up in The Hague to try war crimes, genocide and crimes against humanity. It fears U.S. citizens could face politically motivated prosecutions.

A U.S. veto could, in effect, send a signal to Sudan that its officials, militia leaders and rebels were safe from punishment in Darfur, where fighting is escalating, tens of thousands have been killed and some 2 million people have been herded into squalid camps.

Nine council members have ratified the treaty creating the ICC -- Argentina, Benin, Brazil, Britain, Denmark, France, Greece, Romania and Tanzania. These countries hope Russia, Japan or the Philippines would also vote in favor.

The French draft resolution provides an exemption in Sudan from the court for such nations as the United States, which U.S. officials indicated was not strong enough.

Another U.S.-drafted resolution would call for a stricter arms ban and impose a travel and an assets freeze against individuals in Darfur, still to be named. But China, Russia and Algeria oppose this.

Close

Today's Top News     Top World News
Cross-Straits ties threatened by protest         Kim invites Chinese president for a visit         Kyrgyzstan gov't collapses after protest         Seoul ready for 'diplomatic war' with Japan         UK accuse US of grave rights violations         TOEFL ups the ante with online tests	Kyrgyzstan gov't collapses after protest       Japan seeks dialogue as South Korea prepares for 'diplomatic war'       Cambodian man confirmed dead from bird flu       Schiavo's parents appeal to supreme court       Kyrgyz minister says ready to use armed force       Airborne SARS transmission possible -- study