<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
            Home>News Center>World
                   
           

          Annan: US bid to limit new global court is 'wrong'
          (Agencies)
          Updated: 2004-06-18 08:41

          U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan sharply criticized the United States on Thursday for seeking another exemption from the International Criminal Court, particularly in light of the Iraqi prisoner scandal.


          UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan sharply criticized the United States on June 17, 2004 for seeking another exemption from the International Criminal Court, particularly in light of the Iraqi prisoner scandal. Annan holds a paper doves given to him by students at a public school in Sao Paulo, June 15. [Reuters]
          "The blanket exemption is wrong. It is of dubious judicial value and I don't think it should be encouraged by the council," Annan told reporters.

          The Bush administration, for the third year, is seeking to renew a Security Council resolution that would exempt from the court's prosecution military and civilian personnel "related to a UN-authorized operation" such as that in Iraq.

          The immunity is extended to all nations not among the 94 countries that have ratified a treaty establishing the new court. The resolution expires by the end of the month.

          "It would be unfortunate for one to press for such an exemption, given the prisoner abuse in Iraq, " Annan said. "It would discredit the council and the United Nations that stands for rule of law."

          The United States is investigating abuse, including sexual humiliation, of prisoners by the U.S. military in both Iraq and Afghanistan.

          Security Council envoys say Washington does not yet have enough support or will barely reach the required nine "yes" votes needed for the resolution to pass in the 15-nation body.

          Among the 15 council members, Germany, France, Spain, Brazil, Chile, Benin and Romania, are expected to abstain. But some, like Romania, are reluctant to be responsible for failure of the resolution, if it dies by one vote.

          Crucial is whether China, which has criticized the resolution, casts an abstention. Diplomats say Beijing is seeking some concessions from Washington on Taiwan, although China's U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya, denies this.


          Bruce DeCell, the father-in-law of attack victim Mark Retrocelli, holds a memorial to those killed in the World Trade Center on Sept. 11, 2001, during the National Commission on Terrorists Attacks Upon the United States (9-11 Commission) hearing in Washington, June 16, 2004. Investigators have found no evidence Iraq aided al Qaeda attempts to strike the United States, the commission said on Wednesday in a report that undermines Bush administration arguments for war. [Reuters]
          The resolution is opposed by European nations, except for Britain, which says Washington would veto U.N. peacekeeping missions as it did on one operation three years ago, although U.S. officials have not made that threat yet this year.

          Asked whether this might be the last time Washington was seeking a renewal, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said he knew of no changes.

          "I'm not trying to change anything at this moment," Boucher said in Washington. "I'm saying we're talking with others about how to proceed. "

          WAR CRIMES

          The council voted unanimously last week on a measure endorsing the new Baghdad interim government and U.S. troops to keep order. But that unity could be shattered by the court exemption issue at a time when the Bush administration is searching for peacekeepers in Iraq.

          The court, the first permanent global war crimes tribunal, was set up to prosecute the world's worst atrocities, such as genocide, mass war crimes and systematic human rights abuses.

          Based in The Hague, Netherlands, it is a court of last resort. Analysts say it would not, for example, interfere in the abuse of Iraqi prisoners as long as a country's judicial system probed the allegations.

          The Bush administration is opposed in principle to an international court having any jurisdiction over American soldiers abroad and has signed bilateral agreements with dozens of nations to exempt any American officials.

          "Our concern about the court being fundamentally flawed in no way reflects our lack of determination to ensure that the perpetrators of these abhorrent crimes (in Iraq) are fully prosecuted," said Richard Grenell, spokesman for U.S. Ambassador John Negroponte.



           
            Today's Top News     Top World News
           

          Tashkent Declaration marks new phase for SCO

           

             
           

          Terrorism part of Taiwan separatist agenda

           

             
           

          Financial sector under scrutiny

           

             
           

          FM refutes US claims of negative relations

           

             
           

          Japanese experts arrive in Qiqihar

           

             
           

          Whampoa marks 80th anniversary

           

             
            Annan: US bid to limit new global court is 'wrong'
             
            Bush insists on Iraq-al Qaeda links despite report
             
            Rumsfeld: US hid Iraqi prisoner from Red Cross
             
            Radio record paints chilling 9/11 picture
             
            Bombers kill 41 in strikes on Iraqi forces
             
            9/11 panel: One jet might have been stopped
             
           
            Go to Another Section  
           
           
            Story Tools  
             
            Related Stories  
             
          US general: I'm told to treat POWS like 'dog'
             
          Four British soldiers charged with abuse
             
          US unit says gave earlier report of Iraq abuse-NYT
             
          Memo says Bush not restricted by torture bans
             
          Two marines plead guilty to Iraqi abuse
             
          US Army saw prison violations last fall
            News Talk  
            Does the approval of UN resolution on Iraq end daily bloodshed there?  
          Advertisement
                   
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 美女黄网站人色视频免费国产| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 久女女热精品视频在线观看| 开心激情站一区二区三区| 国产学生裸体无遮挡免费| 国产极品粉嫩福利姬萌白酱| 亚欧美闷骚院| 无码人妻丰满熟妇啪啪| 日韩人妻无码精品系列| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁| 欧美人与动牲交A免费观看| 少妇仑乱a毛片无码| 亚洲综合中文字幕首页| 天堂V亚洲国产V第一次| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看野外| 国产另类ts人妖一区二区| 久久亚洲欧美日本精品| 国模无吗一区二区二区视频| 狠狠久久五月综合色和啪| 日本激情久久精品人妻热| 欧美成年黄网站色视频| 精品久久久久无码| 亚洲人成人网站色www| 欧美熟妇乱子伦XX视频| 亚洲成在人网站av天堂| 婷婷五月综合激情| 黑人猛精品一区二区三区| 欧美另类精品xxxx人妖| 强奷漂亮少妇高潮麻豆| 诱人的老师hd中文字幕| 亚洲日韩图片专区第1页| 国产精品久久久久久久专区| 最新国内精品自在自线视频| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 久久精品国产亚洲av久| 夜夜爽夜夜叫夜夜高潮漏水| 强被迫伦姧高潮无码bd电影| 91色老久久精品偷偷蜜臀| 精品国产一区二区三区久| 人妻系列中文字幕精品| 久久久久中文字幕精品视频|