New prison abuse images outrage lawmakers
(Agencies)
Updated: 2004-05-13 15:07

Fresh photos showing American soldiers brutalizing Iraqi prisoners with snarling dogs or forced sex left members of Congress angry and disgusted, but apparently with few new clues about how widespread the abuse was and who ultimately should be held accountable.

U.S. Senate Majority leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., left, and Sen. John Warner, R-Va, speak with reporters after viewing new images of Iraqi prisoner abuse in the Capitol, May 12, 2004, in Washington.  [AP]

In separate private screenings on Capitol Hill, House and Senate members saw photos and video Wednesday of Iraqi corpses, military dogs menacing cowering Iraqi prisoners, Iraqi women forced to expose themselves and other sexual abuses.

Some lawmakers said the pictures included forced homosexual sex; others said the quality of the photos were too poor to discern what was happening.

The 1,600-plus photos, which included scenes of abuse mixed in with travelogue-type snapshots, were in addition to the those that already surfaced publicly depicting abuse and sexual humiliation at Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad. The photos have created international condemnation and threatened to undermine U.S. military and rebuilding efforts in Iraq.

Lawmakers differed over whether the new batch of photos should be released — a decision likely will be left up to the Bush administration. Some said they feared releasing photos would only further inflame international passions; others argued it would demonstrate the openness of American society and limit the damage caused by the gradual leaking of photos to media outlets.

They also disagreed about whether the photos they saw were much worse than the ones already made public.

Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., said, "It was significantly worse than anything that I had anticipated. Take the worst case and multiply it several times over."

But Sen. Jim Talent, R-Mo., said, "Anything like this is shocking ... but it's generally the same as what's in the public domain — no huge surprises."

A female U.S. soldier points alongside hooded and naked Iraqi prisoners, at the Abu Ghraib prison near Baghdad in Iraq, in this undated photo. [Reuters]

The viewing came a day after Islamic militants, in a video, showed the beheading of an American in Iraq to avenge the prison abuse. U.S. President Bush said "there's no justification" for the killing of Nicholas Berg, 26, and that it would not shake U.S. resolve to bring democracy to Iraq.

The private Capitol Hill screening marked the latest turn in a scandal that has prompted Bush to apologize to the victims and Democrats to demand the dismissal of Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.

The Senate Armed Services Committee has been holding hearings to determine whether prisoner abuses were limited to the Abu Ghraib facility. The committee also wants to see whether responsibility went beyond a small group of enlisted soldiers and their immediate supervisors, who the Army says provided inadequate training and supervision.

Among the uncertainties is whether military intelligence officials directly or indirectly encouraged the abuse in order to "soften up" detainees for interrogations.

The Defense Department is investigating the abuse, and the courts-martial of three military police guards have been ordered.

Lawmakers said the new photos showed small groups of soldiers — fewer than a dozen — abusing the prisoners. Many of the soldiers' faces were already familiar from photos published worldwide. It wasn't clear whether all the abuse took place at Abu Ghraib or at other locations, they said.

Senators said the photographs were presented as a rapid slide show on a screen in the classified hearing room. Pentagon officials were present, but did not answer questions about the pictures, apparently fearing they might interfere with the any prosecutions.

The photos were seized from service members and included many shots unrelated to the investigation, such as pictures of historic sites. Some photos showed what appeared to be soldiers having sex. Because of the vast number of photos — and members coming and going — not all saw the same slides, and impressions varied.

"I saw cruel, sadistic torture," said Rep. Jane Harman, D-Calif., who added that some of the images were of male prisoners masturbating. She said she saw a man hitting himself against a wall as though to knock himself unconscious.

Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb., said he did not see acts of violence, but what appeared to be "results of acts of violence."

He said he saw people in body bags and a person with a face "virtually gone." He saw "people being stitched up above the eyebrow apparently unconscious."

Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., said, "There were people who were forced to have sex with each other."

Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz., said, "There were some pictures where it looked like a prisoner was sodomizing himself" with an object. He said blood was visible in the photograph.

But House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, R-Texas, said he thought "some people are overreacting."

"The people who are against the war are using this to their political ends," he said.

At a Senate hearing earlier Wednesday, Rumsfeld said Pentagon lawyers had approved methods such as sleep deprivation and dietary changes as well as rules permitting prisoners to be made to assume stressful positions.

Gen. Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told senators the military has taken steps to correct the problems that led to abuses, including replacing the military police unit that took some of the photos.

Close

Today's Top News     Top World News
US lawmakers say new abuse photos even worse         Wen pushes for Irish partnership         Taiwan spy sentenced to 5-year in prison         Separation means dead end for Chen         Corruption's long and winding road         Two more US soldiers face court-martial	New prison abuse images outrage lawmakers       Some Arabs say beheading justified       No need for quick tanker deal - Adviser       Syria criticizes sanctions, seeks talks       WWII code-breakers tackle inscription       First lady, first sign on Rumsfeld?