<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          China / Society

          Better supervision of research urged

          By Wang Qingyun (China Daily) Updated: 2012-12-13 09:03

          Genetically modified rice project reveals lack of scientific ethics

          The controversial genetically modified rice experiment in Hunan province shows that science research projects in China need tighter supervision, said Deng Haihua, a spokesman for the Ministry of Health.

          "The incident has revealed that individual scientific researchers lack understanding of laws and self-discipline regarding scientific ethics. Some individual projects have not been well supervised by the institutes responsible," Deng said on Wednesday. "The ministry has required institutes to improve the supervision of their projects while encouraging international cooperation in scientific research."

          The Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement on Dec 6 saying that researchers in an experiment on Vitamin A efficiency - which tested genetically modified rice on schoolchildren in Hengyang, Hunan, in May and June 2008 - kept health authorities and subjects in the dark.

          Guangwen Tang, a researcher at Tufts University in the United States who was responsible for the project, brought the GM rice to China for the experiment.

          Tang and her Chinese counterparts in charge of the project told the parents that their children would eat "rice rich in carotenoid" and "purposely concealed" the fact that the rice was genetically modified, said the statement.

          The China CDC also said authorities learned in July 2008 that the experiment used GM rice and they conducted an investigation, but Yin Shi'an from China CDC's institute of nutrition and food safety and Wang Yin from the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences, the other two in charge of the experiment, "lied and said the research had not started yet".

          In August, Tang published a paper on beta-carotene in GM rice in The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which she co-wrote with others, including Yin and Wang, in which she cited the experiment in Hunan in 2008, saying the study recruitment processes and protocol were approved by the Institutional Review Board, Tufts Medical Center and the Ethics Review Committee of the Zhejiang Academy of Medical Sciences in China.

          The Zhejiang academy admitted on Sept 7 that its committee of ethics had approved the project in 2003, but it had no idea that its experiment in 2008 tested GM rice.

          Yin and Wang were fired for academic misconduct.

          Hu Yuming, a researcher at the Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, another Chinese author of the paper, was fired as the assistant director of the center for slack supervision of the experiment.

          Yin admitted in an interview with China Central Television that aired on Dec 8 that the project's team translated "golden rice", a type of GM rice, into "rice containing rich carotene" in the Chinese version of the informed consent agreed to by the parents in an attempt to avoid sensitivity.

          Zhai Xiaomei, a member of the medical ethics expert committee under the Ministry of Health, believed that part of the reason for concealing the fact that the rice was genetically modified may be people's irrational fear about GM food, though food such as oil made from GM soy beans has been widely sold in China.

          "There is not yet evidence showing GM food is either safe or hazardous," she said. "However, they were not justified in keeping the subjects and their parents in the dark. One of the prerequisites to conducting such experiments is consent based on total information."

          The Health Ministry in 2007 issued a regulation on ethics reviews of biomedical experiments on humans, stipulating that nobody is allowed to trick or threaten people into agreeing to be subjects, and that the subject has the right to back out at any stage of the experiment.

          Besides deliberately lowering the standards in an ethics review, ethics committees, especially those at grassroots medical institutes, lack the capacity to judge the validity of an experiment, Zhai said.

          "Grassroots workers need more training to prevent similar incidents from happening," she said.

          wangqingyun@chinadaily.com.cn

          Highlights
          Hot Topics

          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品久久无码av片软件| 亚洲高清偷拍一区二区三区| 国产亚洲精品AA片在线播放天| 青青草视频免费观看| 大尺度国产一区二区视频| 久久久久免费看成人影片| 亚洲精品一区二区三区蜜臀| 午夜精品久久久久久久2023| 免费看无码自慰一区二区| 久久美女夜夜骚骚免费视频| 亚洲欧美色一区二区三区| 一边摸一边叫床一边爽av| 国产成人午夜福利在线播放| 好吊视频在线一区二区三区| 国产中文字幕精品视频| 人妻少妇偷人一区二区| 天天影视色香欲综合久久| 国产品精品久久久久中文| 在线日韩日本国产亚洲| 久久精品蜜芽亚洲国产AV| 精品偷拍被偷拍在线观看| 桃花岛亚洲成在人线AV| 日本激情久久精品人妻热| 日本精品aⅴ一区二区三区| 亚洲av永久无码精品成人| 欧洲欧美人成免费全部视频| 丁香五月婷激情综合第九色| 国产在线无码免费视频2021| 精品一区二区三区四区色| 秋霞在线观看片无码免费不卡 | 激情综合五月| 又大又粗欧美成人网站| 女被男啪到哭的视频网站| 国产精品爽爽爽一区二区| 国产极品精品自在线不卡| 97人人添人澡人人爽超碰| 久久精品伊人波多野结衣| 国产黄色精品高潮播放| 成人无码午夜在线观看| 99热成人精品热久久6网站| 久久99久久99精品免观看|