<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Make me your Homepage
          left corner left corner
          China Daily Website

          New patent law amendment codifies some IP protections

          Updated: 2009-12-07 07:53
          (China Daily)

          New patent law amendment codifies some IP protections

          In many countries, patent laws provide a research exemption or "safe harbor" exemption as an exception to the exclusive rights conferred by patents, which is especially relevant to drugs.

          According to this exemption, despite the patent rights, performing research and tests for regulatory approval, for instance, does not constitute infringement before the end of the patent term.

          In the United States, this exemption, known as the Hatch-Waxman exemption, is codified in 35 USC 271(e)(1).

          China's patent law does not expressly exempt activities related to regulatory review from patent infringement. Such an exemption currently exists as a judicial interpretation of the broad experimental use exception provided in the patent law.

          The Beijing Intermediate People's Court also recognized such on exemption in its non-infringement findings.

          A new amendment to China's patent law codifies the judicial interpretation and practice by stating that it is not an act of infringement if a patented drug or medical apparatus is manufactured, used or imported solely for the purposes of obtaining and providing information for administrative approval.

          While the amendment, which was approved this year, formalizes the exemption for activities related to regulatory review (the so-called "naked" Bolar exemption), it does not provide any provision for patent linkage with marketing approval.

          In addition, China does not afford patent term extension or patent term restoration to compensate for regulatory delays in obtaining State Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of drugs.

          Although some form of patent linkage has already been prescribed in the Pharmaceutical Registration Regulation, and the Chinese FDA has a set of procedures for implementing such patent linkage, it is essentially a toothless linkage plan.

          This is because under this procedure, it is not an act of infringement to seek marketing approval. As such, it is of limited value.

          Patent exhaustion

          The current patent law in Article 63 provides for domestic patent exhaustion, which applies to a product sold by the patentee in China.

          However, the language of Article 63 is not clear with respect to the importation into China of a product sold by the patentee outside China.

          The amendment clearly provides for both domestic and international exhaustion of patent rights.

          Under the amendment, it is not patent infringement when "anyone uses, offers to sell, sells or imports a patented product or a product directly obtained from a patented process, which has been sold by the patentee or by an entity or individual authorized by the patentee".

          The addition of "imports" makes it clear that the parallel importation of patented products is not considered patent infringement in China.

          The language of the amended statute does not make a distinction between restricted sales and unrestricted sales.

          Therefore, it is not clear whether international patent exhaustion can be prevented by contractual restrictions on the products sold.

          Moreover, international exhaustion, contractual restrictions and antitrust issues interact in complex ways, and companies need to carefully structure their relationships in different jurisdictions to best achieve their business and commercial goals.

          Preliminary injunctions

          Article 61 of the current patent law authorizes courts to issue injunctions before filing an infringement suit, which might be translated as China's efforts to implement its obligations to provide preliminary injunctive relief in patent infringement cases. In China, this is referred to as "pre-suit injunction".

          Judicial Interpretations on "Application of Laws in Trials of Patent Related Lawsuits" issued in 2001 by the Chinese Supreme People's Court provides some procedural guidelines.

          Upon receiving a request for a preliminary injunction, a court must make a ruling within 48 hours if it finds that all procedural requirements have been properly met.

          The 48-hour time limit can be extended in special circumstances. Once issued, the injunction is immediately enforceable.

          The patentee must then initiate an infringement action in the courts within 15 days of issuance of the injunction, or the injunction will be lifted automatically.

          Either party can request the issuing court to reconsider its decision, which is an administrative procedure within the court.

          However, the injunction will remain enforceable during reconsideration and any subsequent proceedings until final judgment.

          The new amendment incorporates the above procedures and further clarifies that the posting of a bond for a preliminary injunction motion is required. If no bond is posted, the motion will be denied.

          Moreover, the petitioner is responsible for any loss sustained by the respondent if the petitioner makes a mistake in the motion for preliminary injunction.

          Notwithstanding the codification of preliminary injunction, obtaining a preliminary injunction in most patent infringement cases in China has always been and is becoming increasingly more difficult.

          Both infringement and irreparable harm must be clearly proven-a burden that is not easy to meet in China, given the country's stringent evidentiary requirements and the lack of traditional discovery procedures.

          Moreover, the Supreme People's Court a few years ago tempered any early enthusiasm for the issuance of such injunctions by issuing an instruction to the lower courts urging caution in issuing preliminary injunctions. The court noted that preliminary injunctions should not be issued in cases involving non-literal infringement or complicated technologies.

          Statistically, most plaintiffs in patent infringement cases do not seek a preliminary injunction for these reasons.

          For those who do request a preliminary injunction, the success rate is relatively high (i.e., greater than 50 percent). It is yet to be seen if the statistics will change after the effective date of the amendment.

          The authors are lawyers for the US law firm Jones Day. The opinions expressed are their own

          Editor's note: The IPR Special is sponsored by the State Intellectual Property Office and published by China Business Weekly. To contact the Intellectual Property Office, the IPR Special hotlines are 8610-64995419 or 8610-64995826, and the e-mail address is ipr@chinadaily.com.cn.

          (China Daily 12/05/2009 page9)

           
          ...
          Hot Topics
          Geng Jiasheng, 54, a national master technician in the manufacturing industry, is busy working on improvements for a new removable environmental protection toilet, a project he has been devoted to since last year.
          ...
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 涩涩爱狼人亚洲一区在线| 国产AV一区二区精品久久凹凸| 亚洲熟妇av综合一区二区| 成人特黄特色毛片免费看| 国产精品久久无码不卡黑寡妇| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 国产精品亚欧美一区二区三区| 亚洲中文久久精品无码照片| 国产四虎永久免费观看| 亚洲av永久无码天堂影院| 国产亚洲综合另类色专区| 免费无码成人AV在线播放不卡| 草草网站影院白丝内射| 精品人妻av区乱码| 色吊丝av中文字幕| 日本老熟女一二三区视频| 色综合久久中文综合久久激情| 精品无码国产污污污免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国码高潮αv| 亚洲全网成人资源在线观看| 久热这里有精品视频在线| 国产超碰无码最新上传| 深夜福利国产精品中文字幕| 岛国岛国免费v片在线观看| 午夜亚洲AV成人无码国产| 纯肉高h啪动漫| 久久精品熟妇丰满人妻久久| 不卡一区二区国产精品| 国产精品亚洲一区二区在| 日韩精品久久不卡中文字幕| 国产小受被做到哭咬床单GV| 亚洲毛片多多影院| 成年男女免费视频网站点播 | 久久精品亚洲国产综合色 | 天美传媒mv免费观看完整| 五月综合激情婷婷六月| 99久久精品久久久久久清纯| 亚洲欧美日韩综合二区三区| 国内熟妇人妻色在线视频| 正在播放国产精品白丝在线 | 麻豆精产国品一二三区区|