<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Business / Opinion

          Not the right move to curb pollution

          By MARIE (China Daily) Updated: 2014-04-22 07:21

          Comment on "Pollution discharge fees to rise dramatically" (China Daily, April 16)

          I don't agree with the method of collecting pollution discharge fee to deal with the environmental problem. Why should the money collected be called "fee" rather than "fine"? Is the fee a penalty that factories polluting and endangering our environment have to pay? Or, is it an amount polluters need to pay to continue polluting our air, water and soil as they wish, without any punishment?

          It's also ridiculous to hear that it's a "commercial way" of checking pollution - the simplistic assumption being that enterprises may stop polluting when they can't afford to pay the discharge fee. If so, why have the environmental authorities set a maximum ceiling for the discharge fee?

          Does it mean that if the enterprises are rich enough to pay the maximum fee, they can pollute our air, water and soil as much as possible and nobody can stop them? It seems more like a measure to allow local environmental authorities to collect money than a move to curb pollution.

          I also don't like the idea of managing the environment after allowing enterprises (and other entities) to pollute it. It's understandable that local authorities are under great pressure to maintain or increase local economies' GDP growth and create more jobs, which they cannot do if they immediately shut down the polluting plants and factories.

          But we shouldn't focus on short-term interests at the cost of long-term social well-being. How much will it cost in the future to clean the environment that we pollute today? I'm sure it will cost much, much more than the money that environmental protection authorities collect today.

          That is why I suggest the authorities change their mind and method to reduce pollution as soon as possible.

          MARIE, via e-mail

          Readers' comments are welcome. Please send your e-mail to opinion@chinadaily.com.cn or letters@chinadaily.com.cn or to the individual columnists. China Daily reserves the right to edit all letters. Thank you.

          Not the right move to curb pollution Not the right move to curb pollution
          Top 10 cities with worst smog in China

          Smoggy memories

           

          Hot Topics

          Editor's Picks
          ...
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 色欲AV成人无码精品无码| 国产精品无码专区| 性激烈的欧美三级视频| 麻豆国产va免费精品高清在线| 亚洲人成人网站色www| 国产乱码一区二区三区免费| 最大色网男人的av天堂| 亚洲日本欧美日韩中文字幕| 亚洲国产综合自在线另类| 日韩精品在线观看一二区| 免费VA国产高清大片在线| 少妇激情一区二区三区视频小说| 国产一区二区三区韩国| 99在线国产| 94人妻少妇偷人精品| 欧洲一区二区中文字幕| 国产精品入口中文字幕| 亚洲av伦理一区二区| 国产精品亚洲二区在线看| 一本色道久久综合狠狠躁篇| 国产自拍一区二区三区在线| 中文字幕日韩国产精品| 色偷偷女人的天堂亚洲网| 亚洲在线一区二区三区四区| 99久久精品国产一区色| 18禁超污无遮挡无码网址| av免费在线观看国产| 国产睡熟迷奷系列网站| 精品国产乱码久久久久久1区2区 | 日韩av综合免费在线| 亚洲精品在线+在线播放| 亚洲一线二线三线品牌精华液久久久| 夜夜偷天天爽夜夜爱| 亚洲av成人精品日韩一区| 久久波多野结衣av| 日韩av一区二区三区在线| 國產尤物AV尤物在線觀看| 国产精品午夜福利小视频| 中国女人内谢69xxxx| 久久伊99综合婷婷久久伊| 最新日韩精品视频在线|