<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Reform nation's coal mines

          Updated: 2011-09-21 07:54

          By Da Sulin (China Daily)

            Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

          Ineffective supervision and weak law enforcement deeply rooted in the pursuit of profit result in too many lives lost

          Figures show China has the worst safety record of all leading coal producers worldwide. And the situation lacks fundamental improvement in recent years. In 2009, China's coal production accounted for 37 percent of the world's total, but related deaths accounted for almost 70 percent, an official from the National Energy Bureau said.

          What made mining coal in China so dangerous?

          The primary cause lies in investors' unwillingness and inability to promote worker safety. Safety investment is a huge cost for a colliery. If the codes are strictly obeyed, the initial investment for even a small colliery with a producing capacity of 300,000 tons per year can exceed 100 million yuan. Most coal-producing countries set a high entry threshold for the industry because only long-term investors under strict supervision will take measures to ensure safety for workers.

          But this is not the case in China, where there are two kinds of collieries: State-owned and township mines.

          The former, directly managed and run by local governments, have a double identity as profit-seekers in the market economy and contributors to State coffers. Not many people responsible for accidents in State-owned collieries have been severely punished.

          Most township coal mines are small enterprises with backward technology and little capital. They owe their survival to the shortage of coal in China, which has lowered the entry threshold for the industry. A considerable number of these are actually running in legal gray areas. And they are more geographically dispersed, which makes it more difficult to supervise them. Therefore, investors in township collieries lack both the ability and the strong will to promote safety.

          Meanwhile, miners have yet to acquire the ability to negotiate for better safety conditions. Most, if not all, of the suffering miners are migrant workers, who, being inferior in the dual economy of urban and rural areas, are forced to exchange their labor for better living conditions for their families. All migrant workers understand how dangerous it is to work in a colliery, a job they describe as "digging coal from hell". But because they lack the skills and resources to find a job that provides equal pay, they have no other choice.

          To make matters worse, the migrant workers are often from different places and lack the knowledge and ability to form an alliance against mining investors. Therefore they have no ability to ask mine managers for safety measures.

          Considering the situation, the State should be providing the miners with assistance and protection. But loopholes in every part of China's colliery supervising system leave much room for improvement.

          First, laws governing colliery safety are far from effective. China's mine safety laws have long been famous for their tolerance of violators. The highest fine for breaking safety codes is only 200,000 yuan ($31,350) a negligible amount compared with a coal mine's huge profits. The heaviest penalty is seven years in jail, which is also very light compared with most other coal-producing countries. To make matters worse, not all people responsible for miners' deaths are fully punished.

          Besides, mine safety laws and regulations have only set basic principles and frameworks, but do not provide executable details. Thus, law enforcers often find it difficult to do their jobs. Even these rough law texts are often contradictory because they are coded by different government departments. This has further reduced the effectiveness of the law to maintain safety.

          Second, State supervisors are limited in their roles. To reduce costs, the State coal mine supervising departments have set up branches only in some main coal-producing areas and supervise mainly State-owned coal mines, thus leaving township coal mines alone.

          Most of the supervisors come from the coal industry administrations from which their department was recently separated. Complicated relations with colliery managers, especially those at the State-owned mines, have prevented them from independently supervising their former colleagues and ex-bosses.

          Even if the supervisors were willing to watch their former bosses, they lack the power to do so. The State supervisors have the power to fine, suspend or shut down collieries, but they can neither forcefully execute these punishments nor charge mine owners if they resist. The fact is only a few mines are shut for falling short of safety standards.

          With ample law enforcement resources and decisive influence over collieries within their territory, local governments are the only player in the game that can supervise them, but a strong will to do so is rare.

          This has its deep roots in the economic structure of the coal-producing areas.

          Most of China's collieries are in relatively underdeveloped regions where economic growth relies heavily upon selling resources. In the eyes of local officials, coal mines that offer great revenue are the best shortcut to promotion, and are thus worth protecting. The situation is often made worse in regions where corruption involves local officials investing in collieries.

          In other words, the guiding principle in a number of areas is that economic development has surpassed coal miners' lives in importance, deactivating China's supervision of coal mines.

          Only a thorough reform of the related legal system, economic structure and coal mining institutions will improve the safety situation.

          The author is a professor of public governance at Nanjing University.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲 制服 丝袜 无码| 亚洲一区精品伊人久久| 国产中文视频| 韩国无码AV片午夜福利| 制服 丝袜 亚洲 中文 综合| 一区二区三区国产不卡| 国产精品自线在线播放| 国产熟女av一区二区三区| 国产成人免费午夜在线观看| 日韩a∨精品日韩在线观看 | 国产精品中文字幕视频| 久久亚洲国产成人精品v| 熟女在线视频一区二区三区| 亚洲aⅴ男人的天堂在线观看| 性一交一乱一乱一视频| 日韩国产中文字幕精品| 亚洲a人片在线观看网址| 欧美日韩国产va在线观看免费 | 一本精品99久久精品77| 国产成人一区二区三区免费| 免费无码又爽又刺激一高潮| 国产精品视频一区二区不卡| 永久无码天堂网小说区| 四虎国产精品永久在线看| 一区二区三区av天堂| 三级国产在线观看| 欧美大屁股喷潮水xxxx| 亚洲国产成人久久一区久久| 亚洲视频欧美不卡| 久久99精品一久久久久久| 久久96热在精品国产高清| 久久青青草原精品国产app| 精品国产中文字幕在线| 人妻在厨房被色诱中文字幕| 日韩中文字幕人妻精品| 亚洲一区二区三区国产精品| 国产一区二区在线有码| 精国产品一区二区三区a片| 丁香婷婷色综合激情五月| 久久国产V一级毛多内射| 国产福利深夜在线播放|