<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Opinion

          Similarity of a growth model

          By Yukon Huang (China Daily)
          Updated: 2011-05-20 14:44
          Large Medium Small

          Similarity of a growth model

          China's economic performance is a subject of heated debate. Admirers see in China a country which has been growing at double digits and has lifted 500 million people out of poverty. They talk about a new growth model built around the "Beijing Consensus" which stresses the role of the state in directing resources. Critics see a repressed financial system that encourages wasteful public expenditures and exacerbates global trade imbalances. So they argue that the "Washington Consensus", which favors a more market-oriented model, remains the preferred option.

          Which of the two is closer to the truth? Neither. But there is a way to interpret China's development that sheds some light on its economic approach. That model is the one used by multilateral development agencies, including the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank.

          Related readings:
          Similarity of a growth model Spending time for growth
          Similarity of a growth model Paving the pathway to growth
          Similarity of a growth model GDP growth target too low: PBOC adviser

          The World Bank aims to accelerate growth in developing countries, motivated by the conviction that the huge income disparities between high-income and emerging market countries are untenable. Not only do these disparities foster economic and trade tensions, but also political frictions emanate from civil strife and migration driven by despair as much as opportunity.

          Developing sustainable solutions to these problems demands that developing countries grow more rapidly and in ways that preserve the global commons, from protecting the environment to making social services broadly available. Moreover, the actions of development banks encouraging growth is justified by market imperfections - which lie at the heart of underdevelopment - including limited information on risks and weak economic institutions that are unable to secure and allocate resources effectively.

          The World Bank provides subsidized loans to developing countries that in turn lend the funds to local authorities and enterprises. Such assistance enables developing countries - whose fragile fiscal and banking systems do not give them access to commercial lending - to support investments with high social returns but whose risk-adjusted return is perceived by markets to be unacceptably low, such as social infrastructure.

          The subsidies on the loans come from budget transfers or government guarantees that allow the World Bank to borrow in international capital markets on favorable terms because repayment of their loans is guaranteed - first, by the recipient governments and, second, by the bank's shareholding governments. Thus, despite skepticism of the viability of loans to countries as diverse as Sudan and Afghanistan, its financial soundness has rarely been questioned.

          China's growth model resembles that of the World Bank: it relies on implicitly subsidized loans to catalyze growth and makes the low rates possible by reducing the incentives to consume and by providing sovereign guarantees. By keeping interest rates relatively low, China can tap the savings of households to subsidize lending. This represents a transfer from current consumption of households in favor of investment.

          If these investments generate high returns, the economy grows faster than it would have otherwise, enabling China to maximize household consumption over time. In reality, personal consumption has been increasing at an impressive rate of 8-9 percent a year. Thus, because its subsidized investment has been so successful and may not have occurred otherwise, China represents a model that has arguably led to sustainably higher, not lower, consumption levels - contrary to the common perception.

          This approach is not new. The Commission on Growth and Development, which assessed the experiences of a group of successful developing countries (including China), noted the importance of high investment and outward-oriented strategies in accelerating growth.

          But the World Bank and China business models share certain risks. Because lending is subsidized and benefits are difficult to evaluate, the potential for waste is significant. For China, this means that curbing current consumption in favor of higher investment is sustainable only if it generates rapid growth.

          Currently, China's fiscal system is inadequate to meet its needs. So the government relies on State-owned banks to channel additional resources to local authorities, agencies and enterprises for infrastructure and production purposes. Over time, however, China's fiscal system must develop, so that loans driven by government priorities and not purely commercial objectives can be transacted through budgetary channels instead of banks. Major reforms will be needed to raise and allocate the necessary revenue to turn "quasi-fiscal deficits" into line items in the budget to improve transparency and reduce risks.

          Because China's major banks are State-owned, the soundness of China's financial system depends on the creditworthiness of the State (much like the World Bank's viability rests on the solidity of its sovereign guarantees). But the country's high savings rate, huge foreign reserves and low external debt ratios imply that a significant surge in bad loans is likely to lead to a controlled scaling back of lending rather than a financial collapse.

          The key question is whether the quality of government-sponsored expenditures continues to justify the transfers from ordinary consumers - and, if so, for how long. For China, the pattern of above-norm increase in productivity, surging FDI inflows motivated by double-digit returns, and consistently high GDP growth has until now suggested that investments have been efficient in the aggregate. But recent claims about waste - as exemplified by China's high-speed railways program - suggest that leaders need to pay more attention to the efficiency of particular programs.

          The World Bank, for example, has also experienced periods when excessive lending to countries with poor economic policies did not generate adequate returns, contributing to debt-servicing problems later. Its response was to tighten lending standards.

          And, just as the World Bank and other development banks face scrutiny on the broader impact of their lending activities including its poverty and governance implications, China needs to consider the sustainability of its growth process. This includes its effect on the environment and internal equity, which senior leaders have recognized as key challenges facing the country.

          The author is a senior associate, Carnegie Endowment, and former World Bank country director for China.

          分享按鈕
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕av无码免费一区| 成人精品视频一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇av综合一区二区| 久久一日本道色综合久久| 99热成人精品热久久66| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 欧美日韩一区二区三区在线视频 | 国产精品日韩精品日韩| 无人区码一码二码三码区| 国产欧美日韩亚洲一区二区三区 | 久久久噜噜噜久久| 国产亚洲精品第一综合麻豆| 日韩有码精品中文字幕| 欧美性一区| 久久亚洲精品情侣| 无码成人一区二区三区| 日韩精品久久不卡中文字幕| 日韩av一区二区三区不卡| 国产亚洲精品久久久久久久软件| 国产成人精品白浆免费视频试看| 老司机午夜福利视频| 最新日韩精品中文字幕| 精品国产乱码久久久久久1区2区 | 久久综合精品国产一区二区三区无| 99麻豆久久精品一区二区| 少妇无套内谢免费视频| 久久天天躁夜夜躁狠狠ds005| 成人福利国产午夜AV免费不卡在线 | 好吊视频一区二区三区人妖| 国产午夜亚洲精品国产成人| 性欧美暴力猛交69hd| 欧美大胆老熟妇乱子伦视频| 四虎影视一区二区精品| 福利一区二区1000| 精品国产AⅤ无码一区二区| 亚洲一区中文字幕在线| 久久人人爽人人片AV欢迎您| 亚洲精品一区二区三区片| 不卡高清AV手机在线观看| 中文字幕人妻无码一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久|