<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Business / Opinion

          Not the right move to curb pollution

          By MARIE (China Daily) Updated: 2014-04-22 07:21

          Comment on "Pollution discharge fees to rise dramatically" (China Daily, April 16)

          I don't agree with the method of collecting pollution discharge fee to deal with the environmental problem. Why should the money collected be called "fee" rather than "fine"? Is the fee a penalty that factories polluting and endangering our environment have to pay? Or, is it an amount polluters need to pay to continue polluting our air, water and soil as they wish, without any punishment?

          It's also ridiculous to hear that it's a "commercial way" of checking pollution - the simplistic assumption being that enterprises may stop polluting when they can't afford to pay the discharge fee. If so, why have the environmental authorities set a maximum ceiling for the discharge fee?

          Does it mean that if the enterprises are rich enough to pay the maximum fee, they can pollute our air, water and soil as much as possible and nobody can stop them? It seems more like a measure to allow local environmental authorities to collect money than a move to curb pollution.

          I also don't like the idea of managing the environment after allowing enterprises (and other entities) to pollute it. It's understandable that local authorities are under great pressure to maintain or increase local economies' GDP growth and create more jobs, which they cannot do if they immediately shut down the polluting plants and factories.

          But we shouldn't focus on short-term interests at the cost of long-term social well-being. How much will it cost in the future to clean the environment that we pollute today? I'm sure it will cost much, much more than the money that environmental protection authorities collect today.

          That is why I suggest the authorities change their mind and method to reduce pollution as soon as possible.

          MARIE, via e-mail

          Readers' comments are welcome. Please send your e-mail to opinion@chinadaily.com.cn or letters@chinadaily.com.cn or to the individual columnists. China Daily reserves the right to edit all letters. Thank you.

          Not the right move to curb pollution Not the right move to curb pollution
          Top 10 cities with worst smog in China

          Smoggy memories

           

          Hot Topics

          Editor's Picks
          ...
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲中文字幕第二十三页| 国产精品久久大屁股白浆黑人| 国产欧美日韩视频怡春院| 香蕉亚洲欧洲在线一区| 国产成人精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲日韩精品无码av海量| 红杏av在线dvd综合| 老司机精品影院一区二区三区| 中文字幕无码久久一区| 男男高h喷水荡肉爽文| 免费看黄片一区二区三区| 色综合欧美亚洲国产| 国产精品亚洲国际在线看| 国产影片AV级毛片特别刺激| 亚洲人成网站18禁止无码| 五月天久久久噜噜噜久久| 少妇脱了内裤在客厅被| 国产女同疯狂作爱系列| 91午夜福利一区二区三区| 99精品国产综合久久久久五月天| 91久久性奴调教国产免费| 五月天丁香婷婷亚洲欧洲国产| 久久99精品久久久久久清纯| 国产婷婷在线精品综合| 日韩东京热一区二区三区| 国产精品中文字幕综合| 无码AV无码天堂资源网影音先锋| 在线高清理伦片a| 亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另类| 手机看片日韩国产毛片| 97国产揄拍国产精品人妻| 精品国精品国自产在国产| 国内永久福利在线视频图片| 人妻无码av中文系列久| 久久综合五月丁香久久激情| 国语精品自产拍在线观看网站| 婷婷色综合成人成人网小说| 亚洲av乱码久久亚洲精品| 国内精品久久人妻无码不卡| 国产精品乱码久久久久久小说| 人人人妻人人澡人人爽欧洲一区 |