<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          US EUROPE AFRICA ASIA 中文
          Business / View

          Give us fresh air, or give us death!

          By Victor Fung Keung from Hong Kong (China Daily) Updated: 2012-11-23 13:30

          Give us fresh air, or give us death!

          'Give me Liberty, or Give me Death!" were words in a speech made at the Virginia State legislature in 1763 by Patrick Henry, a state councilor. Henry's words swung the vote in favor of sending troops to join the Revolutionary War. I would urge some interest groups in Hong Kong to adopt this slogan - "Give us fresh air, or give us death" - and persuade our government to improve air quality in the city.

          Indeed, I strongly believe that Leung Chun-ying, Hong Kong's chief executive, will win the hearts of thousands, if he undertakes to make Hong Kong's air a bit easier to breathe.

          Am I an alarmist? I beg to differ. Hong Kong's air pollution, as measured by the concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in the air that we inhale, is almost three times higher than those in Sydney, New York and London. For God's sake, it is three times higher, not three percent or 30 percent!

          The city's Environmental Protection Department, or?EPD, since 2006 has set a target of "no days" with the air pollution index over the "very high" level of 100. In 2007, the number of days exceeding the "very high" level totalled 74. If you think the number of days has declined since, you are only day dreaming. Sadly, in 2011 the number of days exceeding the "very high" level was 175, up 136% from 2007.

          These numbers and criticisms come not from me but from the government's Audit Commission. It issued a report in mid-November, questioning the effectiveness of the commercial diesel vehicle replacement scheme introduced by the EPD in 2000. After spending HK$1.8 billion ($232.2 million), we still see 50,000 highly polluting vehicles (one-third of them are more than 17 years old) on the city's busy and congested roads.

          The Audit Commission in its report also cast doubt on using government (or taxpayers') money to help equip polluting buses which are close to the end of their lives with devices to cut down nitrogen dioxides levels.

          We know too well the sources of air pollution. We have too many vehicles on the roads and too many polluting trucks and buses; and we can't stop the heavily polluted air floating to Hong Kong across the Shenzhen River. Mr Leung's new government should have the fortitude to "tackle the bulls by the horns".

          There are three kinds of "bulls". The first kind of "bulls" are businessmen in Hong Kong. The government should tell them to replace their commercial vehicles which are more than 10 years old to help reduce pollution. The second type of "bulls" are middle class people. Licence fees for cars over seven years old should be doubled or trebled to encourage owners to switch to new cars which cause less pollution. It would be all the better if some owners give up driving.

          The third kind of "bulls" are the most fierce and hardest to tackle. These are factory owners in the Pearl River Delta. We can talk with the Guangdong provincial government to cut down the quantity of pollutants released by factories in the delta, but Hong Kong has no political muscle to get what we want. If there is no gentlemen's agreement (or having agreements that aren't workable), the Leung government is well-advised to resort to an "out of the box" approach.

          The Hong Kong government could establish a fund to reward factories in the Pearl River delta that voluntarily work to reduce pollution that they produce. If the factories achieve certain targets, we would give them a cash bonus. We have billions of dollars of reserves. Few people in the city would object to such an idea.

          Being a commentator, I must declare my own interest. I have suffered from having an allergy which is linked to bad air. My doctor gives me nasal sprays to stop my running nose but he warns me that the medicine is composed of steroids. Everybody knows that steroids are harmful to people's heath in the long term. To halt my nose from running (such as five minutes before a class that I teach begins), I have to swallow one or two Piriton pills, which has the side effect of making me drowsy for the whole day.

          Deep in my heart I often cry in despair: "Give me fresh air or give me death!"

          The author is coordinator of the B.S.Sc in financial journalism program at Hong Kong Baptist University.

          Hot Topics

          Editor's Picks
          ...
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 老司机亚洲精品一区二区| 一本久久a久久精品综合| 久久精品99久久久久久久久| 91麻豆国产精品91久久久| 成全我在线观看免费第二季| 扒开双腿猛进入喷水高潮叫声| 久久精品免费无码区| 国产欧美久久一区二区三区| 一区二区三区午夜无码视频| 亚洲色大成网站WWW永久麻豆 | 亚洲AV成人无码精品电影在线| 久久久无码精品亚洲日韩蜜臀浪潮| ww污污污网站在线看com| 九九热免费精品视频在线| 99久久婷婷国产综合精品| 国产一区二区三区无码免费| 亚洲欧洲日产国码久在线| 亚洲精品日产AⅤ| 久久国产精品成人免费古装| 亚洲av成人网在线观看| 97人人添人人澡人人澡人人澡| 中文字幕在线国产有码| 偷拍专区一区二区三区| 理论片午午伦夜理片影院99| 亚洲中文字幕无线无码毛片| 久操热在线视频免费观看| 国产在线观看网址不卡一区| 欧美成人免费看片一区| 大陆精大陆国产国语精品| 最新可播放男同志69gay| 91久久偷偷做嫩草影院免费看| 日产国产一区二区不卡| 亚洲熟少妇一区二区三区| av天堂久久精品影音先锋| 免费A级毛片中文字幕| 亚洲国产精品福利片在线观看| 亚洲天堂亚洲天堂亚洲天堂| 伊人久久精品一区二区三区| 国产精品毛片av999999| 无码视频伊人| 91中文字幕在线一区|