<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Survey: Sharp rise in domestic car quality

          Updated: 2012-09-17 07:57

          By Jacob George (China Daily)

            Comments() Print Mail Large Medium  Small 分享按鈕 0

           Survey: Sharp rise in domestic car quality

          SAIC's Roewe was the 2009 champion in JD Power's sales satisfaction study, prized recognition for a home-grown brand. But even as "hard" quality improves, domestic brands continue to lag well behind foreign names in the "soft" component of consumer perception. Provided to China Daily

          Yet feedback from owners continues to favor foreign automakers

          With their reputation for building poor-quality passenger vehicles, China's domestic automakers are the frequent target of criticism by global automotive executives, industry experts and media critics.

          But based on the feedback from the most important critics - actual owners of the vehicles - the story is not so simple.

          It is true that individually and as a group, Chinese-brand vehicles have traditionally not performed well compared to their international competitors in the JD Power and Associates' annual China Initial Quality Study that tracks actual quality problems - known as "hard" quality problems - experienced by Chinese consumers in the first three to six months of vehicle ownership.

          Some of the most common actual problems with Chinese vehicles include such things as difficulty getting the vehicle into gear, the engine losing power when the air-conditioner is on and the vehicle pulling noticeably to one side or the other while driving.

          To understand where China falls behind the competition in quality, however, requires a deeper dive into the research data.

          Once we scratch below the surface, a surprising discovery becomes apparent: While it is true that Chinese domestic brands trail their international counterparts in actual quality, they are making steady and rapid progress, and continue to close the gap with their international counterparts.

          Survey: Sharp rise in domestic car quality

          For example, in the JD Power quality study of 2000, new Chinese-brand vehicles averaged 8.34 actual problems per vehicle. By comparison, new international-brand vehicles sold in China averaged 4.38 problems per vehicle. This means that home-brand vehicles, on average, experienced 4 more real problems per vehicle compared to their international competitors.

          Reducing the gap

          By 2011, however, JD Power's quality study data shows the average problems per vehicle for all domestic brands declined to 2.32, compared to the figure of just 1.31 for international brands. Clearly, the overall gap in real quality between Chinese and international vehicles is closing.

          Perhaps just as important as the hard quality improvements by Chinese brands, is the outlook for the future.

          Based on trend analysis of the actual quality gains in the past decade, we estimate that the China's domestic brands can potentially achieve parity with international brands by 2018, or perhaps even sooner. That is good news for Chinese automakers.

          While advances in the overall hard quality of Chinese-branded vehicles appears undeniable, it is in the area of "perceived" quality - also known as "soft" quality - that Chinese domestic brands are having a tougher time closing the distance with their international counterparts.

          That finding is based on results of JD Power's annual Automotive Performance, Execution and Layout Study in China.

          Rather than collecting tangible examples of things that have gone wrong with a vehicle, the study measures what consumers think or feel about their cars - including subjective likes and dislikes - and assigns a numerical value to the responses. The higher the vehicle's numerical score, the more favorably the vehicle is viewed by consumers.

          Perceived quality

          Examples of perceived quality include impressions about a vehicle's exterior or interior styling, the quality of materials used in a vehicle, the design and feel of buttons and switches, the effective use of space to accommodate passengers or cargo, and many other attributes.

          For Chinese-brand vehicles, some of the lowest scoring categories include the perceived quality of seats and other interior materials, quietness over bumps, the sound and performance of the engine during rapid acceleration, and the audio and temperature controls.

          According to JD Power's most recent performance study results from 2011, Chinese vehicle makers scored below their competitors from Europe, Japan, South Korea and the United States in all 10 categories researched in the study.

          Perhaps of even greater concern for Chinese automakers is that since the launch of the China automotive performance study nearly a decade ago, as a group, domestic brands have always trailed their international competitors.

          Possibly most disconcerting of all is that over this period, research data indicates that the "perceived quality" gap between Chinese brand and their foreign counterparts is not getting smaller. This means that while the "soft quality" of domestic-brand vehicles continues to improve, it is not improving fast enough to catch up with the foreign competition.

          Certainly, some Chinese automakers have invested tremendous amounts of time, money and manpower into improving the "soft quality" of their vehicles, and their efforts show.

          But to become truly competitive in growing their businesses and defending their home turf, China's domestic automakers are going to need to take a holistic approach to vehicle development process, one that includes not only reducing the number of engineering shortcomings in their vehicles, but also designing in quality that appeals to the sensitivities and visceral needs of consumers.

          The writer is the vice-president and general manager of JD Power and Associates.

          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产高清在线精品一区不卡| 中文字幕国产精品综合| 国产精品麻豆成人av电影艾秋| 国产成人精品人人| 天天爽夜夜爽人人爽曰| 欧洲尺码日本尺码专线美国又| 高清自拍亚洲精品二区| 久久96热在精品国产高清| 亚洲岛国av一区二区| 精品一区二区三区不卡| 亚洲国产成人无码网站大全| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品| 国产蜜臀一区二区三区四区| 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交极品| 农村老熟女一区二区三区| 日本高清视频色欧WWW| 国产亚洲精品久久精品6| 免费无码又爽又刺激网站直播| 国产69精品久久久久乱码免费| 岛国一区二区三区高清视频| avの在线观看不卡| 17岁日本免费bd完整版观看| 亚洲 欧美 变态 卡通 自拍| 在线精品自拍亚洲第一区| 日韩大片在线永久免费观看网站| 精品人妻日韩中文字幕| 四虎国产精品免费久久| 国产中文字幕精品喷潮| 日本精品极品视频在线| 日韩精品卡1卡2日韩在线| 真实国产乱子伦视频| 国产精品日韩中文字幕熟女| 亚洲成在人线AV品善网好看| 国产av亚洲精品ai换脸电影| 亚洲精品国产一二三无码AV| 亚洲综合久久一本伊一区| 国产精品免费精品自在线观看| 久久精品一区二区三区综合| 国产精品久久综合桃花网| 国产免费久久精品44| 欧美激情综合一区二区|