<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Chinese EVs can overcome headwinds in global markets

          By Wu Songbo | China Daily | Updated: 2024-04-11 06:50
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          Visitors look at BYD's electric vehicle "Sealion" during the 45th Bangkok Motor Show in Bangkok, Thailand, March 26, 2024. [Photo/VCG]

          China's electric vehicle (EV) industry has become increasingly competitive in the global market thanks to the country making rapid advancements in EV technology, manufacturing capability and quality production. Official data show China's EV production and sales in 2023 reached 9.58 million and 9.49 million respectively, both highest in the world for nine straight years. China also exported 1.20 million EVs in 2023, a year-on-year increase of 77.6 percent.

          The main reason why Chinese-made EVs have become popular is cost competitiveness. And cost competitiveness is partly driven by economies of scale, efficient manufacturing and government support. The large market size and the home market effect have allowed Chinese EV makers to achieve economies of scale, reduce production costs, and sell their products at competitive prices.

          Also, China has made significant strides in EV technology, particularly in areas such as battery technology, electric drivetrains and other connectivity features. Chinese EV makers have also developed competitive electric power trains and battery packs, and built charging infrastructure, contributing to the overall competitiveness of Chinese-made EVs.

          China's shift toward electric vehicles is largely driven by its environmental commitments — to peak its carbon dioxide emissions before 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality before 2060. The country has also built the world's largest charging infrastructure system in terms of number, largest radiation area and most comprehensive service vehicles. And the government's support in the form of investment in the charging infrastructure network has promoted the rapid development of EVs.

          However, the international success of Chinese-made EVs has increased the concerns of the US and European Union countries, with some of them resorting to protectionist measures, including imposing extra tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, to safeguard their own automobile industries. In October 2023, for example, the European Commission launched an anti-subsidy investigation into the imports of battery-driven electric vehicles (BEVs) from China, apparently to determine if they benefit from excessive government subsidies which could harm BEV makers in the EU.

          Besides, last month, US President Biden initiated measures to prevent Chinese-made EVs from entering the US on the pretext of safeguarding national security, claiming they could collect sensitive data of users. The probe may lead to the US imposing additional restrictions on importing vehicles that rely on Chinese software.

          Such efforts to restrict the import of EVs reflect the broader political and economic concerns of the US and EU policymakers about China.

          First, both the US and the EU regard large-capacity EV battery making units as strategic sectors and say the industries are related to its overall competitiveness. While the US has passed the Inflation Reduction Act to provide discriminatory subsidies for EV assembly lines, the EU has enacted battery-related regulations and raised the requirements for battery makers to export their products to the EU.

          Second, major economies, including the US, are paying greater attention to strengthen their supply chains so as to reduce the vulnerability and safeguard national security. China's increasing global market share in EVs and large-capacity battery components has drawn attention to supply chain policies amid anti-globalization sentiments.

          Third, many US- and EU-based fossil-fuel car makers are skeptical about EVs, because the impact of EVs on economies has heightened labor conflicts within the traditional auto sectors in the US and Europe. Consequently, influenced by these interest groups, the US and the EU might consider implementing more protectionist measures against imported EVs or battery components.

          Electric vehicles have many advantages compared with fossil fuel-operated vehicles, such as environmental benefits, reduced operating costs, enhanced driving experience, and technological advancements. These advantages make China a global leader in EVs, and given the global success of Chinese-made EVs, the US and the EU cannot win the competition by resorting to protectionist trade policies.

          If the Western countries impose punitive tariffs on Chinese-made EVs, they will unwittingly raise EV prices for their consumers, and protectionist measures that aim to shield domestic companies from competition may hinder innovation and lead to inefficiency, especially in an industry that relies heavily on technological advancements.

          Fourth, protectionist policies will hinder the countries' efforts to reduce emissions, and weaken the global fight against climate change. Protectionist measures that limit a country's access to international markets or EV technologies may slow down the global progress in addressing climate change, prompting people to question the legitimacy of protecting "domestic industries" amid the growing need to address climate change.

          And fifth, hindering competition or even cracking down on foreign companies for political reasons such as on the pretext of safeguarding national security will make people wonder whether the market in some developed countries is as free and open as they claim.

          Technological advancements in the EV sector can only be achieved through cooperation and fair competition. Political strategies based solely on competition among major powers will not only restrict the development of EVs but also undermine global emissions reduction efforts. Policymakers should carefully consider these factors before taking any climate decision.

          The author is an associate researcher at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

          If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品 欧美激情 在线播放| 欧美熟妇乱子伦XX视频| 久久久久久亚洲综合影院| 自拍第一区视频在线观看| 久久久久国产精品人妻电影| 黄床大片免费30分钟国产精品| 久久精品伊人无码二区 | 99精品国产在热久久婷婷| 亚洲大尺度无码专区尤物| 亚洲国产综合自在线另类| 一道本AV免费不卡播放| 国产99青青成人A在线| 成人精品一区日本无码网| 亚洲男人第一av天堂| 国产熟睡乱子伦视频在线播放 | 色综合 图片区 小说区| 2021国产v亚洲v天堂无码| 日韩亚洲视频一区二区三区| 亚洲综合精品一区二区三区| 亚洲色av天天天天天天| 欧美日本中文| 蜜桃av噜噜一区二区三区香| 午夜高清福利在线观看| 亚洲国产精品500在线观看| 国产农村老熟女乱子综合| 国产精品亚洲а∨天堂2021 | 国产中文三级全黄| 亚洲人成成无码网WWW| 九九热在线观看视频精品| 亚洲第一色网站| 色偷偷女人的天堂亚洲网| 欧美韩中文精品有码视频在线| 天干夜天干天天天爽视频| 亚洲伊人精品久视频国产| 人妻无码av中文系列久| 国产精品98视频全部国产| 国产999精品2卡3卡4卡| 无码国产精品一区二区免费i6| 人妻少妇偷人一区二区| 新婚少妇娇羞迎合| 国产成人午夜福利精品|