<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Heated debate triggered as more US colleges go 'test optional'

          By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2022-05-02 08:16
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          A student majoring in biology works during a class break at California State University in November 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

          Student barriers

          The SAT costs $55 for the 2021-22 school year. Gabrielle Piccirilli, who is majoring in English at Villanova University, wrote in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal that high schools often encourage students to take exams multiple times to improve their scores, and these costs are barriers to low-income students "scoring as high as their intelligence allows".

          "A student who can take the SAT four times after rigorous test-specific prep will have a better shot than one who can only afford to take it once without preparation outside of schooling-even if they are equally smart," Piccirilli wrote.

          Schools seeking to diversify their student body are also concerned that test scores are often closely linked to a student's race and wealth.

          A study in 2020 by researchers at the Brookings Institution found a wide racial gap in SAT results, particularly in math.

          According to an investigation by the institution into the SAT math scores for more than 2.1 million high school graduates in 2020, white students scored an average of 93 points higher than black students, and 69 points higher than Hispanic or Latino students. Asian students scored 85 points higher than white students.

          Of those scoring more than 700 points in the 800-point math test, 43 percent were Asian and 45 percent white, while 6 percent were Hispanic or Latino, and 1 percent black.

          "Black, Hispanic or Latino students routinely score lower in the math section of the SAT-a likely result of generations of exclusionary housing, education and economic policy-which too often means that rather than reducing existing racial gaps, using the test in college admissions reinforces them," researchers said in their report. "While attempting to measure college readiness, the SAT both mirrors and maintains racial inequity."

          These findings echo an analysis by Georgetown University researchers in 2019, who found that if the most selective US colleges and universities relied solely on SAT scores for admission decisions, their campuses would be wealthier, whiter and have more male students.

          The biggest losers were black and Latino students, whose numbers would be cut nearly in half, with the principal winners being wealthy white male students, whose ranks would increase, according to the analysis.

          After dropping the standardized testing requirement, some universities have seen significant increases in applications for admissions. The University of California received record-level applications for autumn last year and admitted its largest and most diverse undergraduate intake ever, according to its president's office.

          Cornell University reported that it enrolled a more diverse intake, including a nearly 50 percent rise in the proportion of first-generation college students-those whose parents did not complete a four-year college or university degree.

          The University of Chicago shifted to test-optional admissions in 2018 to expand diversity. Its current intake of freshmen has 56 percent more black students, 26 percent more Hispanic and Latino students, 33 percent more rural students and 36 percent more first-generation students than the intake that enrolled before the policy change.

          |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next   >>|
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一区二区三区小说| 亚洲国产精品午夜福利| 亚洲乱码中文字幕小综合 | 尤物国产精品福利在线网| 日韩一区二区三区三级| 国产亚洲精品欧洲在线视频| √天堂中文www官网在线| 久久99精品久久久久久清纯| 国产午夜福利片在线观看| 国产成人综合久久精品下载| 亚洲精品揄拍自拍首页一| 欧美成人精品三级在线观看| 国产啪视频免费观看视频| 亚洲乱熟乱熟女一区二区| 国产欧美另类精品久久久| 亚洲国产性夜夜综合| 极品少妇无套内射视频| 国产成人亚洲精品在线看| 欧美黑人又粗又大又爽免费 | 免费可以在线看a∨网站| 国内自拍视频在线一区| 丰满人妻一区二区三区高清精品| 国产人禽杂交18禁网站| 亚洲一级特黄大片在线播放| 婷婷四虎东京热无码群交双飞视频| 国产女同一区二区在线| 久久亚洲国产精品久久| 人妻少妇看a片偷人精品视频| 激情综合网激情五月激情| A级毛片100部免费看| 亚洲国产精品无码久久电影| 色天天天综合网色天天| 亚洲精品美女一区二区| 精品人妻二区中文字幕| 久久精品国产久精国产思思| 免费无码AV一区二区波多野结衣| 中文字幕国产精品资源| 国产精品十八禁一区二区| 中文字幕日韩精品国产| 色欲狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕 | 亚洲熟少妇一区二区三区|