<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区

          Heated debate triggered as more US colleges go 'test optional'

          By LIA ZHU in San Francisco | China Daily | Updated: 2022-05-02 08:16
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          A student majoring in biology works during a class break at California State University in November 2019. [Photo/Agencies]

          Student barriers

          The SAT costs $55 for the 2021-22 school year. Gabrielle Piccirilli, who is majoring in English at Villanova University, wrote in an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal that high schools often encourage students to take exams multiple times to improve their scores, and these costs are barriers to low-income students "scoring as high as their intelligence allows".

          "A student who can take the SAT four times after rigorous test-specific prep will have a better shot than one who can only afford to take it once without preparation outside of schooling-even if they are equally smart," Piccirilli wrote.

          Schools seeking to diversify their student body are also concerned that test scores are often closely linked to a student's race and wealth.

          A study in 2020 by researchers at the Brookings Institution found a wide racial gap in SAT results, particularly in math.

          According to an investigation by the institution into the SAT math scores for more than 2.1 million high school graduates in 2020, white students scored an average of 93 points higher than black students, and 69 points higher than Hispanic or Latino students. Asian students scored 85 points higher than white students.

          Of those scoring more than 700 points in the 800-point math test, 43 percent were Asian and 45 percent white, while 6 percent were Hispanic or Latino, and 1 percent black.

          "Black, Hispanic or Latino students routinely score lower in the math section of the SAT-a likely result of generations of exclusionary housing, education and economic policy-which too often means that rather than reducing existing racial gaps, using the test in college admissions reinforces them," researchers said in their report. "While attempting to measure college readiness, the SAT both mirrors and maintains racial inequity."

          These findings echo an analysis by Georgetown University researchers in 2019, who found that if the most selective US colleges and universities relied solely on SAT scores for admission decisions, their campuses would be wealthier, whiter and have more male students.

          The biggest losers were black and Latino students, whose numbers would be cut nearly in half, with the principal winners being wealthy white male students, whose ranks would increase, according to the analysis.

          After dropping the standardized testing requirement, some universities have seen significant increases in applications for admissions. The University of California received record-level applications for autumn last year and admitted its largest and most diverse undergraduate intake ever, according to its president's office.

          Cornell University reported that it enrolled a more diverse intake, including a nearly 50 percent rise in the proportion of first-generation college students-those whose parents did not complete a four-year college or university degree.

          The University of Chicago shifted to test-optional admissions in 2018 to expand diversity. Its current intake of freshmen has 56 percent more black students, 26 percent more Hispanic and Latino students, 33 percent more rural students and 36 percent more first-generation students than the intake that enrolled before the policy change.

          |<< Previous 1 2 3 4 Next   >>|
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 日韩乱码人妻无码中文字幕视频| 无码专区一va亚洲v专区在线| 国产一区二区激情对白在线| 亚洲av二区三区在线| 日本三级理论久久人妻电影| 免费视频一区二区三区亚洲激情 | 26uuu另类亚洲欧美日本| 性大毛片视频| 日韩本精品一区二区三区| 免费无码黄十八禁网站| 国产亚洲精品第一综合麻豆| 国产精品视频一品二区三| 免费无码的av片在线观看| 亚洲欧美综合人成在线| 精品少妇人妻av免费久久久| 在线播放亚洲成人av| 久久频这里精品99香蕉| 国内自拍视频一区二区三区| 五月综合激情婷婷六月| 老色鬼永久精品网站| 日韩亚洲国产综合高清| 久久精品国产一区二区三| 国产香蕉尹人综合在线观看| 色偷偷一区| 亚洲日本欧洲二区精品| 国产目拍亚洲精品一区二区| 四虎国产精品永久在线下载| 日韩成人无码v清免费| 日韩精品久久一区二区三| 欧美日韩精品综合在线一区| 亚洲中文字幕精品第三区| 中文字幕国产精品中文字幕| 国产av一区二区亚洲精品| 亚洲国产成人无码电影| 国产羞羞的视频一区二区| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区蜜桃| 天堂资源在线| www成人国产高清内射| 亚洲色成人网站www永久四虎| 青青草一区在线观看视频| 麻豆精品丝袜人妻久久|