<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Any forces to 'split China' just paper tigers

          By Liu Hui | chinadaily.com.cn | Updated: 2021-11-24 12:43
          Share
          Share - WeChat
          Photo taken on July 21, 2019 from Xiangshan Mountain shows the Taipei 101 skyscraper in Taipei, Southeast China's Taiwan. [Photo/Xinhua]

          The United States has been fishing in the troubled waters of the Taiwan Straits for some time now. Its latest provocative action is sailing its missile destroyer USS Milius through the sensitive Straits, which has intensified the already high tensions.

          What's worse, Taiwan was invited to join nations, including the United Kingdom and Japan, at the so-called virtual democracy summit in early December, according to the US State Department on Tuesday.

          In fact, the Joe Biden administration's contradictory remarks and actions are raising serious doubts about its commitment to the one-China policy.

          On Oct 22, the US president said "we have a commitment" to defend Taiwan if the Chinese mainland launches an attack. Four days later, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken called on all United Nations member states to support Taiwan's participation in the UN system. And on Nov 3, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Mark Milly told a security forum that the US military "absolutely has the capability" to defend Taiwan against a potential attack from the mainland, "no doubt about that".

          Although US politicians have at times tried to walk back on their remarks on Taiwan, they have continued to make provocative statements. Their departure from the one-China principle, which according to the three joint communiques the US is bound to follow, has emboldened the ruling Democratic Progressive Party authorities to seek "Taiwan independence".

          In an interview with CNN on Oct 26, Taiwan leader Tsai Ing-wen confirmed for the first time the presence of US military personnel on the island, and said she believes that if Taiwan comes under attack from the mainland, the US and other "democracies" will come to its aid.

          Tsai's arrogance and confidence can be attributed to the wrong signals she receives from the US. The DPP authorities have pinned their hopes on the US, expecting it to help advance their political agenda of "Taiwan independence". Their common goal is to contain the mainland's rise and split the Chinese nation, thereby heightening tensions across the Straits.

          Yet neither the US nor the DPP will succeed in doing so. Instead, their collusion could backfire on them.

          To begin with, in fulfilling its so-called promise of defending Taiwan, Washington risks stumbling into a war with Beijing, that is, if it doesn't abandon the island at the last moment. According to a strategy document, which was made public by previous US president Donald Trump before his departure and was supposed not to declassify until the end of 2042, the US would defend Taiwan — a link of the first island chain — from the mainland. The document further squeezed the Biden administration's policy room for compromise on the Taiwan question.

          With its own complicated problems, the US can no longer retain its global hegemony. But it is meddling in China's internal affairs to check the country's rise. However, the separatists who have blind faith in the US should know that their nefarious designs will be crushed.

          Second, it is doubtful whether the US forces can truly "defend" Taiwan. Perhaps a few decades ago, the US could have done that. But that possibility is declining given the mainland's growing military might and unshakable determination to realize national reunification.

          It is the mainland that will decide when and how to solve the Taiwan question, depending on the Taiwan's authorities approach toward the "one-China" policy, which will significantly undermine the US' capability to defend Taiwan.

          And third, the US' belief that many UN member states will support Taiwan's participation in the UN system, especially the World Health Organization and the International Civil Aviation Organization, is just wishful thinking.

          Half a century ago in 1971, the UN General Assembly passed Resolution 2758, restoring all rights of the People's Republic of China and recognizing the representatives of its government as the only legitimate representative of China to the UN. So Taiwan, as an integral part of China, must abide by the 1992 Consensus which embodies the one-China principle when taking part in the forums of international organizations such as the World Health Assembly.
          It is because of their "pro-independence" stance and refusal to acknowledge the 1992 Consensus that the WHA and ICAO shut out Taiwan.

          During the days when Kuomintang was the ruling party of the island, the Chinese central government made some special arrangements to allow Taiwan as a region to participate in various international institutions as the Kuomintang didn't seek independence. Based on the International Health Regulations, a liaison office was set up on the island to provide immediate information from the WHO and allow medical experts from Taiwan to attend the WHO's technical meetings. The island can also get the international aviation body's standards and advice.

          The efforts of the US and the DPP to project Taiwan as a weak link in the global health system and air safety mechanism are nothing but a sham. Their true goal is to make Taiwan a full-fledged member of the WHO, in order to strengthen DPP's the "Taiwan independence" agenda.

          Not only China but also many other UN member states have seen through this political trick and opposed it. The one-China principle, China's bottom line, on the Taiwan question should never been challenged. All conspiracies to split China will backfire on plotters. And all those forces are just paper tigers.

          The author is a researcher at the Institute of American Studies, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

          The views don't necessarily represent those of China Daily.

          If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产一区二区日韩经典| 国偷自产一区二区三区在线视频| 亚洲国产av无码精品无广告| 东京热大乱系列无码| 中文字幕 欧美日韩| 高中女无套中出17p| 激情 自拍 另类 亚洲| 欧美成人免费看片一区| 亚洲大尺度无码专区尤物| 日本高清在线观看WWWWW色| 午夜福利一区二区在线看| 国产av一区二区三区| 日韩欧国产美一区二区在线| 亚洲熟妇自偷自拍另欧美| 国产中文三级全黄| 成人午夜在线观看日韩| 亚洲av无码片在线播放| 精品亚洲男人一区二区三区| 美乳丰满人妻无码视频| jizzjizzjizz亚洲熟妇| 国产伦视频一区二区三区| 国产成人免费一区二区三区| 97精品人妻系列无码人妻| 国产精品亚洲片在线观看麻豆| 久久精品女人的天堂av| 在线中文字幕亚洲日韩2020| 亚洲色无码专区在线观看精品| 亚洲免费成人av一区| 国产午夜福利在线机视频| 国产精品成人中文字幕| 无码av免费永久免费永久专区| 一区二区三区鲁丝不卡| 色婷婷国产精品视频| 亚洲精品一区二区三区在| 日本一区二区在线高清观看| 国产高清国产精品国产专区| 少妇真人直播app| 久久一级黄色大片免费观看| 日本中文字幕乱码免费| 色老99久久九九爱精品| 久9re热视频这里只有精品免费|