<tt id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"><pre id="6hsgl"></pre></pre></tt>
          <nav id="6hsgl"><th id="6hsgl"></th></nav>
          国产免费网站看v片元遮挡,一亚洲一区二区中文字幕,波多野结衣一区二区免费视频,天天色综网,久久综合给合久久狠狠狠,男人的天堂av一二三区,午夜福利看片在线观看,亚洲中文字幕在线无码一区二区
          Global EditionASIA 中文雙語Fran?ais
          Opinion
          Home / Opinion / Op-Ed Contributors

          Reducing the housing burden key to boosting births

          By Chen Jie | China Daily | Updated: 2021-07-30 06:53
          Share
          Share - WeChat

          JIN DING/CHINA DAILY

          On July 20, the central authorities unveiled a policy document aimed at reducing childrearing and education costs and build a "fertility-friendly society" as a follow-up move to the May 31 policy decision of allowing all couples to have three children. Less than six years ago, in October 2015, China relaxed its more than three-decade-old stringent family planning policy, allowing all couples to have two children.

          This swift change in the family planning policy should be seen against the backdrop of China's rapidly aging population and low birth rate.

          Many experts say China's socioeconomic environment, especially in urban areas, doesn't encourage couples to have even two, let alone three, children. In particular high housing prices and the instability of the rental housing sector are detrimental to young couples' plans to have children-or even marry. Thus, to create a "fertility-friendly environment" for couples, building a "fertility-friendly" housing sector is a prerequisite.

          Houses used to be allocated for free and as non-tradable welfare goods to urban residents in China during the planned economy era, from 1949 to 1977. But severe housing shortage and deteriorating housing conditions under the welfare housing system prompted the government to gradually commercialize the housing sector from the 1980s.

          The 1998 reform abolished the welfare urban housing system. Since then, the housing sector in Chinese cities has expanded exponentially. But as housing supply and prices are largely driven by profit, many people cannot afford to buy a house.

          Since 2017 the government, following the principle that houses are meant for living in, not for speculation, has implemented several rounds of regulations to curb speculation in the housing and land markets. Yet housing prices in cities have kept increasing.

          Most of previous generations' urban residents acquired houses before the housing reform or in the early stages of the reform. And the prices of their houses have increased manyfold thanks to the housing market boom. But the rising housing prices that have increased the value of the older residents' property have now become roadblocks for younger couples to buy a house and raise a family.

          So to build a "fertility-friendly society", the authorities first need to allocate housing on the basis of people's need, not on the demand of capital.

          First, the authorities should adopt more stringent measures to curb speculation in the housing market. Many people still purchase houses in cities as investment. Such investors, many of them with deep pockets, easily crowd out young couples desperately seeking to buy a house. The authorities should therefore impose strict housing purchase restrictions-for example, no apartments should be sold to a buyer who already owns two housing units, and people buying a second house should be asked to make a down payment of at least 70 percent of the total price.

          Second, when it comes to housing purchase, the government should give priority to couples with more than one child. Many big cities have introduced a lottery system to ensure fair allocation of new housing units under the price ceiling regulation. And several cities including Shanghai, Shenzhen and Hangzhou have adopted a point-based system to accord priority to certain groups such as those without a home or with a longer tax-paying history, in the allocation of housing units.

          Yet no city has given priority to couples with, say, two children in the housing market. However, to encourage couples to have more children, it is necessary to give preference to people with more children in housing allocation.

          Third, the authorities also need to give priority to couples with more than one child in the allocation of subsidized, affordable housing, while also helping reduce the housing costs. The government has invested heavily to expand the subsidized, affordable housing system, but so far most of such affordable housing is targeted at low-income urban households. Which means a large percentage of the young couples can neither purchase an apartment in the open market nor avail of the traditional subsidized housing system. No wonder they are referred to as "the sandwich class".

          Fortunately, on July 2 the State Council, China's Cabinet, issued a policy document for expeditiously developing the affordable rental housing sector, in order to provide accommodation for a large percentage of the new urban residents regardless of their incomes.

          And fourth, the authorities should also take concrete measures to make housing affordable for young people. Since young urban residents generally have high job mobility, they often tend to flock to big cities and choose to live in rental housing in the short term, in order to save money. Local governments therefore should take appropriate measures to check the increase in rents, strictly regulate the rental housing market, and ensure everyone has equal access to local public services including children's education.

          Also, community governance, neighborhood development and urban redevelopment should help create a children-friendly environment. Since the housing and population policies are part of the social housing policy, they should be integrated to realize the common goal of raising China's fertility rate. And since the population policy is also aimed at raising the fertility rate, the housing policy should be aimed at creating a "fertility-friendly" environment for couples.

          The author is a professor and director of the Housing and Urban-Rural Development Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University.

          The opinions expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of China Daily and China Daily website.

          If you have a specific expertise, or would like to share your thought about our stories, then send us your writings at opinion@chinadaily.com.cn, and comment@chinadaily.com.cn.

          Most Viewed in 24 Hours
          Top
          BACK TO THE TOP
          English
          Copyright 1994 - . All rights reserved. The content (including but not limited to text, photo, multimedia information, etc) published in this site belongs to China Daily Information Co (CDIC). Without written authorization from CDIC, such content shall not be republished or used in any form. Note: Browsers with 1024*768 or higher resolution are suggested for this site.
          License for publishing multimedia online 0108263

          Registration Number: 130349
          FOLLOW US
          主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲av激情久久精品人| 久久热这里只有精品国产| 在线免费播放av日韩| 国产精品亚洲玖玖玖在线观看| 国产精品亚洲国际在线看| 精品一区二区三区乱码中文| 欧美日韩在线亚洲二区综二| chinese性内射高清国产| 天天做天天爱夜夜爽女人爽| 国产重口老太和小伙| 精品国产小视频在线观看| 日韩精品亚洲精品第一页| 91福利国产在线在线播放| 国产精品高清视亚洲乱码| 国产a网站| 精品无码老熟妇magnet| 亚洲高清有码在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区国产精品| 永久免费av网站可以直接看的| 国产一区二区免费播放| 国产日韩一区二区在线看| 极品少妇的粉嫩小泬视频| 白嫩人妻精品一二三四区| 精品久久久无码中文字幕| 国产一区二区三区AV在线无码观看| 亚洲区福利视频免费看| 国产精品理论片在线观看| 国产又黄又硬又粗| 少女大人免费观看高清电视剧韩剧| 亚洲国模精品一区二区| 人妻熟女一区二区aⅴ| 国产av午夜精品福利| 国产免费又色又爽又黄软件| 精品国产亚洲午夜精品a| 91精品国产综合久久精品| 国产精品国产精品一区精品| 最新亚洲人成网站在线观看 | 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 国产av一区二区三区精品| 姑娘视频在线观看中国电影| 久久国产精品99久久蜜臀|